Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US grants N Korea nuclear funds[President George W Bush waived the Framework's}
bbc ^ | Wednesday, 3 April, 2002 | bbc

Posted on 04/04/2002 6:00:25 PM PST by freespeech1

The US Government has announced that it will release $95m to North Korea as part of an agreement to replace the Stalinist country's own nuclear programme, which the US suspected was being misused.

Under the 1994 Agreed Framework an international consortium is building two proliferation-proof nuclear reactors and providing fuel oil for North Korea while the reactors are being built.

In releasing the funding, President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors to ensure it has not hidden away any weapons-grade plutonium from the original reactors.

President Bush argued that the decision was "vital to the national security interests of the United States".

Deal under threat

North Korea has repeatedly threatened to withdraw from the agreement in recent weeks.

The row has heightened tensions on the peninsula

It has been angered by President Bush's accusation that Pyongyang was part of an "axis of evil" producing weapons of mass destruction.

This annoyance was compounded by Washington's decision to withhold this year's certification that North Korea is keeping its side of the Agreed Framework.

It has systematically refused to allow International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors into its nuclear facility at the Yongbyon research base north of the capital.

Delayed

Pyongyang has justified its refusals by pointing out that the reactors are way behind schedule.

They were originally expected to have been completed next year, but now construction is not expected to even begin until August.

Another issue is the different interpretations of the inspections' timing.

According to the Framework, North Korea should be fully compliant with IAEA safeguards when "a significant proportion" of the project is completed.

The builders say that will be around May 2005, and given the inspections will take at least three years, this means that North Korea should start admitting inspectors now.

But Pyongyang believes that they should only allow the inspections to start, rather than finish, by that date.

The head of the Non-proliferation Policy Education Centre in Washington, a critic of the Agreed Framework, has warned that even when the new reactors are completed they may not be tamper-proof.

"These reactors are like all reactors, They have the potential to make weapons. So you might end up supplying the worst nuclear violator with the means to acquire the very weapons we're trying to prevent it acquiring," Henry Sokolski told the Far Eastern Economic Review.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: nkoreanuclear; nwo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Howlin; jim robinson; dan from michigan
ping
41 posted on 04/05/2002 9:13:24 AM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Well, it is Friday and I was just trying to put some Dale Carnegie principles into action in my benevolent post. You know. Attack what they are saying and not they, themselves. Hate the sin, love the sinner. Maybe Dane's hero GWBush and his compassionate nice guy-istic altruistic naivety is rubbing off on me a bit! :-)
42 posted on 04/05/2002 9:27:46 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
LOL, your turning into a softie! I just couldn't pass up a chance to razz you concerning our first disagreement, part of post #38. Take it easy bud.
43 posted on 04/05/2002 9:36:35 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
N.Korea, in About-Face, Says U.S. 'Sworn Enemy'

Thu Apr 4,10:11 AM ET

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea (news - web sites) said on Thursday that the United States was its "most wicked sworn enemy" in a series of diatribes issued less than 24 hours after Pyongyang dropped hints it might restart frozen dialogue with Washington.

"The U.S. is the most wicked sworn enemy of the Korean nation as it is not only hindering inter-Korean exchange and cooperation ... but also putting a stumbling block in the way of achieving Korea's reunification," the state media quoted the North's Asia-Pacific Peace Committee as saying.

A separate KCNA report quoted a North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman as demanding Washington pay compensation for what it said was a U.S. failure to uphold a key deal which froze Pyongyang's suspected nuclear weapons program.

Yet another statement, in the official Rodong Sinmun newspaper, demanded the withdrawal of U.S. troops in South Korea (news - web sites), saying "it is imperative to put an end to the presence in South Korea by the U.S. imperialist aggression troops."

In what was taken in Washington as a possible sign North Korea was willing to talk, late on Wednesday, KCNA quoted a Foreign Ministry official as saying Pyongyang would re-engage with an international consortium at the heart of the crucial nuclear agreement with the United States.

44 posted on 04/05/2002 3:30:10 PM PST by freespeech1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Hear, Hear.. !

45 posted on 04/05/2002 3:35:39 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: illbenice
All you pro Bushers better add this to the list of reasons why Bush is a bad leader.

Source BBC. I'll reserve judgement until I've heard 'the rest of the story'. Good day.

46 posted on 04/05/2002 3:41:14 PM PST by Magnum44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freespeech1
No comment, I'm tired of critiquing...he's turning me into a pessimist.
47 posted on 04/05/2002 3:43:18 PM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespeech1
N.K. said they'd like to hold talks the other day. If I'm not mistak this was met by beligerant comments out of Washington. I may be wrong here, but it seemed to me they practicly egged on N.K. What was that all about?
48 posted on 04/05/2002 11:55:44 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: freespeech1
This is some SERIOUS flip flopping and only weakens any past or future "forcefullness" Bush exhibits.

This is dangerous for our nations security.

Is he snorting again?

49 posted on 04/08/2002 4:01:24 PM PDT by Kay Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kobyashi1942; cutlass
And I keep trying to tell you folks that jr. is just as brilliant as his father!! And I've Got Proof!!!------

"When I need a little advice about Saddam Hussein, I turn to country music." —George Bush Sr., in 1991

"We cannot let terrorists and rogue nations hold this nation hostile or hold our allies hostile.'' —George W. Bush, in Aug. 2000

So There!!!

50 posted on 04/08/2002 4:10:39 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freespeech1
"Secretary Rumsfeld said the foreign pilots are needed because US military forces are strained by the global war on terrorism and UN peacekeeping missions." [but DynCorp is Making Money!]

Might want to flag the Rummy Idolators to this one. They Tend to be jr. Idolators as well.

I wish I could find that thread where they compared jr. to Soloman.

51 posted on 04/08/2002 4:15:02 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Thanks for pinging "the apologists". Wouldn't want them to miss this ;-)
52 posted on 04/08/2002 4:16:57 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"I may be wrong here, but it seemed to me they practicly egged on N.K. What was that all about?"

It's all part of the Master Plan jr. and his daddy and Kissinger have. Maybe it would be best if we don't discuss this! Loose Lips..... ya' know. And ...........we're at WAR!.

53 posted on 04/08/2002 4:19:59 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
If we didn't give out so much foreign aid money we might just be able to protect America. $100 million here, $500 million there, that's our tax dollars they're handing out like it was M&M's.
54 posted on 04/08/2002 4:44:17 PM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson