Posted on 04/04/2002 6:00:25 PM PST by freespeech1
The US Government has announced that it will release $95m to North Korea as part of an agreement to replace the Stalinist country's own nuclear programme, which the US suspected was being misused.
Under the 1994 Agreed Framework an international consortium is building two proliferation-proof nuclear reactors and providing fuel oil for North Korea while the reactors are being built.
In releasing the funding, President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors to ensure it has not hidden away any weapons-grade plutonium from the original reactors.
President Bush argued that the decision was "vital to the national security interests of the United States".
Deal under threat
North Korea has repeatedly threatened to withdraw from the agreement in recent weeks.
The row has heightened tensions on the peninsula
It has been angered by President Bush's accusation that Pyongyang was part of an "axis of evil" producing weapons of mass destruction.
This annoyance was compounded by Washington's decision to withhold this year's certification that North Korea is keeping its side of the Agreed Framework.
It has systematically refused to allow International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors into its nuclear facility at the Yongbyon research base north of the capital.
Delayed
Pyongyang has justified its refusals by pointing out that the reactors are way behind schedule.
They were originally expected to have been completed next year, but now construction is not expected to even begin until August.
Another issue is the different interpretations of the inspections' timing.
According to the Framework, North Korea should be fully compliant with IAEA safeguards when "a significant proportion" of the project is completed.
The builders say that will be around May 2005, and given the inspections will take at least three years, this means that North Korea should start admitting inspectors now.
But Pyongyang believes that they should only allow the inspections to start, rather than finish, by that date.
The head of the Non-proliferation Policy Education Centre in Washington, a critic of the Agreed Framework, has warned that even when the new reactors are completed they may not be tamper-proof.
"These reactors are like all reactors, They have the potential to make weapons. So you might end up supplying the worst nuclear violator with the means to acquire the very weapons we're trying to prevent it acquiring," Henry Sokolski told the Far Eastern Economic Review.
Keep in mind that this is a BBC story. I have learned to take what the UK press reports with a grain of salt.
However, on the other hand, if this is true, we have a problem.
...are only as strong as the utter morons that are supporting them.
I was replying to the article, which I assumed to be true. Of course, the article could be totally wrong, which wouldn't be the first time the media screwed up.
N. Korea to Resume Reactor Talks
Wed Apr 3, 1:47 PM ET
By SOO-JEONG LEE, Associated Press Writer
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - North Korea (news - web sites) said Wednesday that it will resume dialogue with a U.S.-led international consortium currently building two nuclear reactors in the isolated, impoverished country.
It was unclear from the communist North's official Korean Central News Agency's brief English statement whether North Korea also wants to open dialogue with the U.S. government.
U.S. State Department officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the statement appears to refer only to the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization, or KEDO, the consortium set up to construct two light-water nuclear reactors in the country.
And an official at North Korea's U.N. Mission in New York said his understanding was that the reference to resuming negotiations "means the resumption of the dialogue with KEDO." The official spoke on condition of anonymity.
During contacts in New York last month with North Korean diplomats, U.S. officials proposed that North Korea resume dialogue with Washington as well as the consortium, said the news agency, KCNA. The North Koreans had postponed a scheduled meeting with the consortium last month.
Quoting an unidentified Foreign Ministry spokesman, KCNA said North Korea "carefully examined the U.S. side's position and decided to resume the negotiations, taking its request into consideration."
Under a 1994 agreement between Washington and Pyongyang, the consortium is building two reactors in the northeastern corner of North Korea.
In that accord, the United States promised those two reactors worth $4.6 billion in return for a freeze on the North's nuclear facilities suspected of being used to build atomic bombs. The reactors, financed mostly by South Korea (news - web sites) and Japan, are not of a type that can produce weapons-grade plutonium.
In New York, Yoichiro Yamada, assistant director for policy affairs for KEDO, said Wednesday that North Korea had contacted the consortium about resuming talks. He said they were working on scheduling a date.
The North made its announcement after a South Korean special envoy, Lim Dong-won, arrived in the country Wednesday to meet Northern leaders and pass on messages from the United States including, Lim said, the offer to restart talks.
The Clinton administration held talks with the North, including a visit by Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (news - web sites) to the capital, Pyongyang, in October 2000, but President Bush (news - web sites) ended the dialogue when he came into office and ordered a policy review.
In January, Bush branded North Korea as part of "an axis of evil" of countries including Iran and Iraq with ambitions to develop weapons of mass destruction. But the next month, on a visit to South Korea, Bush offered to start talks with the North to discuss ways of ending its alleged weapons program.
KCNA quoted the Foreign Ministry spokesman as saying that during the New York contacts, North Korea underlined that "groundless slanders against (the North) should not be repeated and, if such things happen, it will regard the U.S. position as deceptive."
On Wednesday, the White House reaffirmed its willingness to reopen a dialogue with North Korea.
Asked if Bush was willing to stop using the term "axis of evil" to describe North Korea, Iran and Iraq, spokesman Ari Fleischer (news - web sites) said "the president will continue to speak out forthrightly about what he sees as ways to make peace throughout the world.
"Our position has always been and will continue to be that we welcome dialogue with North Korea anytime anywhere," Fleischer added.
In the New York meetings, U.S. special envoy Jack Pritchard met twice with North Korea's U.N. mission chief, Pak Kil Yon, and proposed the dialogue resumption.
After the New York talks, South Korean President Kim Dae-jung (news - web sites) said he believed that the United States and North Korea were "moving toward dialogue."
North Korea has complained of delays in the reactor project. In retaliation, it is denying U.N. inspectors full access to its nuclear laboratories, making it impossible to determine whether it is operating a clandestine weapons program.
On Wednesday, Lim, the South Korean envoy, met in Pyongyang with Kim Yong Sun, a close confidant of leader Kim Jong Il, and was expected to meet the top North Korean leader later during the three-day visit, officials in the South said.
Lim a diplomatic and national security adviser for South Korean President Kim underlined in his meetings that the North must engage in dialogue with Washington to try to resolve a long-running standoff, Lee Bong-jo, a South Korean official, told journalists in Seoul.
U.S. and South Korean officials believe that North Korea may have extracted enough plutonium for one or two atomic bombs before it froze its facilities under the 1994 agreement.
The North already has stockpiles of up to 5,000 tons of biochemical weapons and is developing a missile that could carry a significant payload to Alaska, Hawaii and parts of the continental United States, U.S. officials say.
U.S. officials also designated North Korea as a major exporter of missile technology to countries such as Iran, Libya, Syria and Egypt.
Lim, the South's envoy, also urged North Korea to restart projects that the two sides had previously agreed on as part of their own efforts to bring reconciliation on the divided peninsula including reunions of separated family members and a cross-border rail line, said Lee, the South Korean official.
The Koreas, divided in 1945, share the world's most heavily armed border. About 37,000 U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea as a deterrent against North Korea, a legacy of the 1950-53 Korean War.
Devold said Denmark and the Netherlands would join Norway with the deployment of F-16 fighter jets and pilots over the USA later this year if requested by the Bush White House.
This one really disturbs me. What it looks like is that the countries involved cannot (for political reasons) or will not (policy, safety, etc) support US initiatives "against terrorism" in the Phillipines, Afghanistan, where ever. So, US pilots are in harms way in these places I really don't care about (not a globalist) while foreign pilots could shoot down a hijacked US plane.
Our military should be protecting our borders, not assuring that Afghani girls have the opportunity to learn to read (that whole thing really frosts me!)
On the other hand, it is somewhat news to me that Japan, as you have somehow managed to conclude, is "my adopted homeland". Gee I had not realized this, Dane.
He seems to spend way too much time in the ranks of those who gravitate to Geo. Bush on personality issues (cult-ist?) rather than stand and fight on philosophical bases.
At least most of the caustic posts he writes.
I am about to challenge his political objectivity, by asking him to direct me to FR posts of his in the last three years that OPPOSE strongly something Bush did or said and I will likewise direct him to some of my posts where I did in fact offer strong support of Bush on an issue or issues, despite me generally coming from an America-First, conservative traditionalist anti-communist anti-appeasment perspective. This challenge would probably go unanswered, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.