Posted on 04/04/2002 8:13:02 AM PST by maryz
Revelations about the pedophilia of a disturbing number of Catholic priests reached a critical point in Boston recently. The spectacle of a cardinal archbishop brought to the bar of secular public opinion and required to answer questions from the hostile media sent a frisson of shame down the spine of Catholics throughout the country. Priests with a known history of pedophilia had been passed from parish to parish in the pathetic hope that the problem would somehow disappear. Many demanded that the cardinal resign. In his reply, he said that he was a shepherd, not a CEO, and a shepherd does not desert his flock. But the question is, What is he going to do about the wolves?
Should any bishop be surprised at the apparent lack of morality in significant number of the clergy? The problem is not simply how pedophiles have been reassigned. It is time to face up to the fact that during the past 35 years, our bishops have permitted a culture of dissent, largely defined by bizarre conceptions of sexuality, to flourish in the Church.
Nearly 20 years ago, Thomas Sheehan triumphantly announced that the liberals had won – we control, he chortled, the bishops’ conference, the chanceries, the universities, the seminaries, the magazines, religious education, everything. Now orthopraxy could replace orthodoxy. It is plain to everyone now that the praxis fostered by liberal Catholics is anything but orthos. For Sheehan was right, alas. The situation he gleefully described came about because bishops acted like CEOs rather than shepherds.
Theological dissent, which began in 1968 with the rejection of Humanae Vitae by moral theologians, is defined in terms of an attitude toward sexuality antithetical to Christian morality. Yet in 1977, in a study commissioned by the Catholic Theological Society of America, Catholic moral doctrine was systematically turned on its head. The neologism “homophobia” came to be used to characterize those – that is, faithful Catholics – who condemned homosexuality. This widespread subversion of Catholic morality and the undermining of the natural disgust with the unnatural went largely unchecked. And bad theory became bad practice.
This did no go uncontested. The Fellowship of Catholic Scholars was formed to prevent magisterial teaching from being kept from the faithful by moral theologians. Women for Faith and Family has been a watchdog of the bishops’ conferences, with special concern for the liturgy. Catholics United for the Faith has fought the good fight. What is common to these and other like groups? They were all given the cold shoulder by our bishops. They were counseled (when talked to at all) not to be strident and divisive. The situation Sheehan described was there for all to see, but to point it out was considered alarmist. The Church in America had gone into Vatican II as arguably the strongest in the world, vibrant, growing, devout. Look at it now. The dismantling has been from within and could not have been done without the collaboration of our bishops.
By and large, faithful Catholics have had to look past local bishops to the bishop of Rome for direction during these dark days. If our bishops had taken their cue from Pope John Paul II, we would not be watching cardinals talking of pedophiles as sick and in need of counseling. Sins have been committed! The Church does not need the categories of pop psychology to examine its conscience now. Souls have been endangered. Sound doctrine has been in short supply.
The deepest irony of all is that the cowardice of bishops was largely due to a desire to be treated well by the secular media. It is this misbegotten policy that has delivered us over to the derision of our enemies. But it is the judgment of God we should fear. Bishops who do not fit the profile suggested here are those who do not cater to the media, who show a pastoral concern for the next generation of priests, and who have often started their own seminaries to avoid the problems mentioned. A kind of home-schooling.
For there have been heroes among our bishops; they have gone their own way, heeding John Paul II. Perhaps in the future, missionaries will be sent out from Lincoln and Omaha and Denver and Lacrosse to evangelize the lost sheep in our coastal cities. Meanwhile, mercy should be asked, not aof the media but of the Almighty.
(I hope I got the right Thomas Sheehan in the link I supplied; he looks right.)
Catholic bump!!!!!!
The deepest irony of all is that the cowardice of bishops was largely due to a desire to be treated well by the secular media. It is this misbegotten policy that has delivered us over to the derision of our enemies. But it is the judgment of God we should fear. Bishops who do not fit the profile suggested here are those who do not cater to the media, who show a pastoral concern for the next generation of priests, and who have often started their own seminaries to avoid the problems mentioned.
Excellent article, thank you for the link.
I read this excellent column in Crisis magazine. I think he takes a "harder line" than does Deal Hudson the editor.
In any event, I think one can point to an even earlier event that presaged the rejection of Humane Vitae (no, not "Original Sin"), The Land of Lakes statement when such libs as Notre Dame's Theodore Hesburgh (Sp) told Rome, in effect, "Thanks for sharing, but we will decide what constitutes "teaching" in our great and glorious free-speech country."
They adopted a protestant position. Now, they refuse to accept Ex Corde Ecclesiae. The devolution continues, desuetude is evident, the bad has pushed out the good and the coruption of the best has proved to be the worst and the Hierachy dithers, temporises and hair-splits.
Woe betide those embracing marginal changes when radical and profound changes are obviously necessary
The Vatican didn't get it, though. When asked what it would mean if the Church did change the teaching on artificial birth control, if it would mean that the Church had been wrong, some functionary said "No. It would simply mean the Church had moved from one certainty to another."
Notice that John Paul II has never convened another commission to "study" anything.
Thanks.
Basically, it is the taking over of parishes or dioceses by lay persons as trustees who would then rule and control the parishes or dioceses. It was a real danger in the early days when the Church was being established in America beginning with Bishop Carroll of Baltimore. It finally was brought under control but I see dangers ahead with people calling for lay boards and lay participation on boards in an attempt to deal with the present so-called crisis. It goes back to the very nature of the priest and bishop who is solely configured configured to Christ as head and shepherd. Trusteeism attacks the very nature of the priesthood. I hope our bishops don't succumb in this area. Things could get REAL nasty if they do. I personally see the National Catholic Reporter making this take over the top item of their leftist agenda.
I agree whole-heartedly. My own observation over the years is that way too many of the laymen who want to get involved Church administration are absolutely the ones (IMHO) who should have no part of it.
On the radio this morning, I heard someone who is with that Voice of the Faithful. I was only half listening, but two points I did notice are that he wants a married clergy and he "hates the way the Church is trying to scapegoat homosexuals."
Since you seem so well-informed, can you tell me the provenance of the phrase Nolo episcopare (if I'm spelling it right; I don't have a Church Latin dictionary, and it's not in Lewis and Short).
Lay it on 'em, Ralph.
Where is the OUTRAGE! There is no spine in the American hierarchy outside of a faithful few.
Wasn't that Mahoney on Fox about half an hour ago denying that homosexuals in the priesthood are a problem? I only caught the end of it, but it looked like Mahoney.
Sorry. Can't help you.
I'm not sure what you mean by the that. Do you think Doctrine changes or develops? Do you think it possible for a Pope to "change" Doctrine on contraception?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.