Posted on 03/28/2002 8:04:49 AM PST by sheltonmac
Rather than crash the pro-Bush orgy threads, I thought I would honor the requests of the "we must support the president at all costs" crowd and let them bask in their Republican utopia in ignorant bliss. Consider this a thread that seeks actual debate and discussion concerning the "accomplishments" of our current president. Feel free to voice your support or opposition to the president's policies. After all, dissension, even among conservatives, can be healthy.
This thread is in response to the blatant display of sheer ignorance on the part of some FReepers. There have been several threads initiated lately that have included some rather disturbing posts. Without naming names, I would like to share some of those with you:
"I guess when you want to get MEANINGFUL CFR you avoid the obvious veto bait and keep the issue out of the dem's hands, so that hopefully you can get a Senate elected and some JUDGES appointed.This person supports the president so much that he or she is willing to overlook the clear unconstitutionality of the Incumbent Protection Act. The president ignored his oath of office and deliberately signed an unconstitutional piece of legislation as part of some well-concealed strategy? Please.I guess when you are running a WAR you don't have time for this stuff that is nothing more than petty political junk. Instead, you get the bill where the SC can decide it."
"If you're 'proud he's your President' why don't you try supporting him instead of bashing him.Translation: President Bush is smarter than his critics. We should trust him without so much as a whimper of criticism regarding any unconstitutional legislation he may force down our throats. He hasn't betrayed anyone but the American people, so back off.He's smarter than you are. He knows what he's doing.
And he hasn't betrayed anyone."
"There are many of us who have chosen to STILL support the President even though we may disagree with some of the things he's done. Where is the reality in expecting the President to agree with you on absolutely everything he does? It's nowhere. Because that reality does not exist no matter how hard we try to convince ourselves that it does.Perhaps the "one issue" that dismays so many people is the fact that the president we are expected to support has violated the very solemn oath he swore to keep, that being his promise to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. Say what you want about Clinton. Play the "What if Gore were elected" game if you want. That was then, this is now. We have a president in office who essentially told America, "This law may be unconstitutional but I'm signing it anyway."But consider this. Think back two years ago... and now think of what the alternative could have been. Cripe, even Rosie O'Donnell admits she didn't like GWB, but even she supports him now. I am simply amazed that it takes one issue, one issue, to dismay so many people."
Has anyone read the statement on FreeRepublic's main page? It reads as follows:
Free Republic is an online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America.I always thought standing for smaller government meant just that, whether that means criticizing a Democrat or Republican administration. We need to ask ourselves one question: are we for smaller government and more freedom? If the answer is "Yes," then act accordingly. Let's not fall into the trap that says we must support the liberal policies of a president at all costs simply because he's not as liberal as a Democrat.
Sanity, sweet sanity!
Just like the Supreme Court killed the hopes of pro-lifers with Roe v. Wade, right? Wrong. If the response to Roe v. Wade is any indication, we should realize that one Supreme Court decision does not mean an issue is dead. Besides, the Supreme Court has already ruled that limits can be placed on campaign contributions. What makes you think this will go down in flames? I think the president could have used his position to publicly educate the people as to why this bill is unconstitutional and why he was going to veto it.
But because a Repub did it, suddenly its OK to wipe your feet on the Constitution and break your oath to God! President Bush has made a grave error and he has been doing that alot lately. I may not have a dog in the hunt come election time, maybe I'll vote to stay home instead.
Nothing like a politican not getting a photo op!
While signing unconstitutional bills, you alienate your conservative base as is evidenced here by the number of people posting angry messages about how our president is no conservative.
The only strategy involved is doing whatever it takes to be re-elected. CFR is only one of the more blatant examples where both the r's and d's in power ignore the Constitution. For some reason, CFR has registered on the radar of party sycophants.
The fact that the r/d leadership realize that they are rewarded with the votes and excuses of the true believers for their shredding of the Constitution guarantees it will continue to happen.
regards
J.R.
I am hoping he will respond to his base, and limit this leftward movement, and return to Constitutional integrity; either by reversing his stance, of promoting his own initiative for reform of "CFR reform" to eliminate unconstitutional aspects of that legislation. This would happen after November 2002, when Republicans control both houses of Congress once again. I am hoping for this and much more.
But, if he chooses to ignore his base, he will have ignored a most important lesson from the past. He will have violated a cardinal rule of politics, and will lose the next election... whether I support him or not.
Exactly. There is no guaranty that the Supreme Court will kill this.
If you were awake, you would notice the beginning of the accompanying argument.The argument that will go with it, will be, we should be conducting the peoples business, not chasing this crap. Several senators led by Lott, have already advanced this argument, about Energy and Spending bills not being passed while CFR was Done.
However, I will not join the "It's the end of the world" crowd who threaten to defect to the Libertarians or the America First Party or the Know-Nothings when Bush fails whatever the ideological purity test is fashionable this week. He's an elected official. He will never be ideologically pure. Reagan wasn't.
I find it irritating that Bush isn't as perfect as I am, but I'm going to live with the irritation because I firmly believe that every protest vote in the last election served to undermine the eventual victory Bush won. It's undermining his presidency today -- just take a look at what the Democrats are doing to his judicial nominations. And if Al Gore were in charge of the country right now, I'm sure we'd all be discussing just how many square miles of the United States would be enough to appease Osama. I don't want to run that risk in '04, either.
LOL, when you put it that way... LOL! Me too!
because of perot, Cliton won in 92, and because of that, the GOP got control of both houses of Congress in 94..and because Clinton is evil, the dems supported him lemming like during impeachment, which is why Gore lost..had Gore been running as an incumbent in 200o, he'd have won hands down, and where would we be today?
LOL!
Here's another loyalist laugher: Bush signing an unconstitutional bill is just like every other president. Does this argument sound familiar? Does this ring a bell: hey, every president fooled around.
The people who are going ape crap over defending this indefensible act are pulling their swill straight out of the Clinton playbook. It is disgusting!
I hold Bush responsible for letting this divisive issue pit conservative vs. conservative. This did not have to happen.
Can you believe the number of people weaving these elaborate stories about how this really a good thing for conservatism? Give me a break.
And how do you know this? Bush has never said as much. Did he sign the education spending bill in hopes that such a waste of the taxpayers' money would be declared unconstitutional? Did he sign the Patriot Act hoping it would be declared unconstitutional?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.