Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Official Bush Accomplishment List
Miss Marple | March 27, 2002 | Miss Marple

Posted on 03/27/2002 9:22:46 AM PST by Miss Marple

I think it would be nice to collect a list of all of the things President Bush has accomplished thus far in his term. In an effort to provide FAIR and BALANCED coverage to President Bush's administration, I thought interested Freepers could post accomplishments, both large and small, which they appreciate.

Please do not hesitate to list EO's, roll-backs of EO's, regulation changes with which you are familiar, etc.

All positive accomplishments are welcome. If you have negative comments, please post them on the other thread. Thank you.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: accomplishments; bush; progress; wins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-432 next last
To: sonofagun
After having the law overturned by the Supreme court, the Demos will beat GW over the head about appointments to the courts, saying that we need to carefully consider the ability and partisanship of the "eeevilllll right wing court". All recommendations for appointments will have to pass a rigorous anal exam, or be subject to an embargo by the Demos. Never ever compromise with evil, and that is what the Ds are, and compromise is what GW is all about.
381 posted on 03/27/2002 11:26:28 PM PST by jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I know full well "who" you are as a poster on this site.

Obviously you don't.

You did not vote for Bush so you are not betrayed.

A lie...or gross ignorance talking about things you know nothing of.

Get over it...

I don't get over attacks on the Bill of Rights...sorry.

...and take your crocodile tears elsewhere.

I've heard similiar comments from defenders of the President's action repeatedly tonight. Sorry. If defenders of the Constitution are driven from this place, it will be nothing but a wasteland of mindless socialist drivel...not worth anyone's time.

You are not "incensed" you are delighted.

How in the h*ll would you know? Again, you don't know what you're talking about.

This, in your mind, is Bush's Waterloo and are having the time of your life. You are as transparent as glass.

I would hardly rejoice at the President's political demise. If you knew me, you would know that. But obviously you aren't interested in the facts of the matter.

382 posted on 03/27/2002 11:29:37 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I would hardly rejoice at the President's political demise. .

Then why are you so loudly asking for it?

383 posted on 03/27/2002 11:32:54 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Post them.

Go read numerous posts and threads on FR.

Then get out a little.

FReepers particularly, and conservatives in general, have been fighting their hearts out against this CFR cr*p for months. Where have you been?

384 posted on 03/27/2002 11:33:08 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Then why are you so loudly asking for it?

He signed it, not me. The damage is already done. My pointing it out isn't going to change a thing now.

385 posted on 03/27/2002 11:35:09 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
FReepers particularly, and conservatives in general, have been fighting their hearts out against this CFR cr*p for months. Where have you been?

Big difference in fighting CFR and abandoning the Bush. I know that is hard for a "my way or the highway" self described conservative but that's the facts. The political purists always over estimate their political clout and influence. You would think they would finally realize why they NEVER gain political clout and influence.

386 posted on 03/27/2002 11:39:34 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

President slams McCain and CFR/WP Slams Bush and the Right Wingers

Who says he's a sore loser? Who says he just couldn't give John McCain his moment in the Rose Garden, a ceremonial signing of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill? Who says he would rather look petty than go through the gripping and grinning and pen-handling that a White House ceremony entails?

Who? Just about everybody, after George Bush dashed off his signature between bouts on Iraq with Condoleezza Rice and the vice president. Then he dashed off to raise funds.

McCain got a call at 7 a.m. at his Arizona home from a junior White House aide whose name he didn't know, telling him the bill had been signed. Later, a White House emissary brought to his office a commemorative pen and a note of congratulation. McCain issued a statement striking for its terseness: "I'm pleased that President Bush has signed campaign reform legislation into law."

Perhaps Bush was playing, as he so often does, to his right wing, which hates McCain, foams at his bill and deplores his lack of deference to Bush. They attribute McCain's insubordination to the fact that he "never got over South Carolina" -- the state where Bush effectively ended McCain's White House hopes.

The right wing is not moved by the sight of magnanimity and bipartisanship. Right-wingers thought Bush was right to call the bill "flawed" the day it passed the Senate.

"And don't forget," says Wertheimer, "we'll have the solicitor general of the U.S., Ted Olson, on our side" -- not to mention Ashcroft. They both promised a Senate committee they would do their darndest for the changes the president cares so little for.

387 posted on 03/27/2002 11:44:49 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
Thanks, my friend. You're very kind =^)

One of these days we will say we knew you when.

Actually -- and I mean this with all sincerity -- this place will always be my home, and all of you will be like family to me =^) That'll never change.

Please send this to Rush he has been so upset.

I might just do that =^)

388 posted on 03/27/2002 11:44:56 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
Another typ-o alert (Methinks I need coffee..;^) One of these days we will say we knew you when.

Actually -- and I mean this with all sincerity -- this place will always be my home, and all of you will [ALWAYS] be like family to me =^) That'll never change.

389 posted on 03/27/2002 11:46:22 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Big difference in fighting CFR and abandoning the Bush.

You have made several nasty comments to me...comments that do nothing but show your ignorance of me and my positions. Now you say I'm abandoning Bush? I never said I was abandoning him.

If you will read a little more carefully, you will find that I have been decrying the damage that this is doing to the GOP. You might want to think about that a little deeper. If you would, you would realize that I care about the success of the President...and the Party that many have worked so hard to build into the majority party in this country.

I know that is hard for a "my way or the highway" self described conservative but that's the facts. The political purists always over estimate their political clout and influence. You would think they would finally realize why they NEVER gain political clout and influence.

If the people that believe in the principles of this site are what you describe...then there is no hope for this country.

If the political whores and hacks are the only possible winners, as your comment would suggest, then the Republic so many have given it all for is done.

The fact that people like you are running my Party, and my country, and my Bill of Rights, and my children's future, makes me sick to my stomach.

390 posted on 03/27/2002 11:51:17 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The fact that people like you are running my Party, and my country, and my Bill of Rights

Then may I borrow YOUR bill of rights or YOUR country or YOUR party? You seem to have no problems with self-esteem, reality maybe but not your opinion of yourself.

391 posted on 03/27/2002 11:57:12 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
No, they belong to you as well...even though you don't seem to value them too highly.
392 posted on 03/28/2002 12:01:06 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: Cable225;MissMarple
Actually, Bush wouldn't get commented on in a negative fashion if he weren't so busy trying to destroy our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, as well as our Culture. However, you don't care about those things, after all, you'd rather just be happy that we have a "Republican" in the White House.

Is that Principled? Is that what is good for our Nation? Is that Constitutional, or do you not care?

I wonder if any of you actually understand the dire situation that our country is in, and how we have limited time if we are to put the brakes on the collision that is about to occur.

Culturally speaking, we are being invaded by hordes of illegal Mexicans, as well as numerous other nationalities moving in from the south. These are not Legal Residents, and the tide is so great that they will not assimilate, not to mention the fact that many resent our country.

Economically, our nation is in shambles, much to do with high taxation, government waste, unnecessary agencies, etc. It's so out of control that it's quite possible we'll be bankrupt within ten years. What about Social Security? How are we going to pay for that with a Boomer Generation getting ever-closer to retirement. Social Security ran afoul when the government started robbing the caufers, and now we're left with a form of socialism and taxation to deal with it. It's a pyramid scheme, and it will ultimately collapse. Some claim that this is why illegal immigration isn't dealt with seriously. However, is it worth the social services, the higher taxes, the more costs as opposed to benefits, a balkanized America, friction, chaos, more debt, etc.? The true solution would be less government through less spending. However, Washington is too stupid to think of that, for everyone has to protect their own little UnConstitutional alphabet agency, and they have the attorneys and special interest groups to represent them.

What about the fact that Bush caved on stem-cell research. I know, you claim that compromise was necessary, but on moral decisions such as this, no it is not.

What about his appointments of two homosexuals to his cabinet. One as an Aids Czar, and another as Ambassador to Canada?

What about CFR? I know, I know, you probably believe that it's part of W's plan. Who cares? The Constitution exists for a reason. It isn't designed to be toyed with, manipulated, etc. That is the work of a rabid Leftist. A "Conservative" should be more dignified. Furthermore, as whacked-out as the Supreme Court has been, with many of the justices ascribing to the secular humanist world view, there's a chance that this will not be thrown out. Even if it is, why take the chance? It's too risky, and it reflects a lack of principle.

What about Bush claiming that he will not let "his view" on abortion dictate whether an appointment to the supreme court will be Pro-Life or Pro-Infanticide? Is this a Conservative marker?

What about the massive federal control of education bill that Bush signed? What about the out-of-control federal spending (even without the war)?

Don't you see, our country is being ripped apart on the Spiritual, Economic, Cultural, Constitutional, and Governmental fronts (tyranny). George W. has helped contribute to the decline. Can't you see it? It's so obvious, yet you continue to talk about the "Good things he has done". Most of the "good that W. has done" is nothing more than inaction on a few extremely Socialist/Communist policies. That is, he's said no to them. That maintains the status quo, in the sense, that we don't move further into tyranny. However, most of what he has done and openly promoted is UnConstitutional (CFR, Education, Amnesty), or it is a severe lack of good judgement.

Bush is leaving the Conservatives who truly wanted to weed out the corruption. Yet, he's abandoning his base and is supporting Pro-Big Government, Pro-Left Wing, and Pro-Tyranny policies.

Again, why is it so hard to see?

393 posted on 03/28/2002 12:01:41 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Goodness, I wonder why the most ardent Bush supporters are women?
394 posted on 03/28/2002 12:23:13 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
You mean that he's actually beginning to show signs of Conservatism, unlike the RINO, Socialist Crowd?
395 posted on 03/28/2002 12:25:19 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
Bush doesn't respect American Sovereignty. If he did, he wouldn't be busy diluting our borders. Furthermore, he wouldn't be breaking the law. What about all this foreign aid global taxation nonsense. He, at least, has stated that he'd be for it if other nations help us in the war effort. Good grief. This is a loss of American Sovereignty. What about NATO planes flying over America? What about World Peacekeeping Missions continuing? Yeah, Bush cares a lot about American Sovereignty.
396 posted on 03/28/2002 12:28:45 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: JavaTheHutt
I began to realize that there wasnt much of a difference between the parties back around the summer of last year, around the time that Bush, as well as many Republicans, were for pushing through an amnesty. Other things such as the Education Bill played into my opinions.

Republicans may be a little better than Democrats as far as local races go. However, on the national scale, there is not much difference. You have to analyze the individual, not the party.

397 posted on 03/28/2002 12:48:13 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: swheats
Diversity for diversity sakes is PERVERSITY.

Merit should be the only credential.

398 posted on 03/28/2002 12:49:49 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Oh, Arne, weren't you banned? I mean, after you basically cursed us with the most vile insults that anyone could use.

You proved yourself to be a guttermouth.

Oh, and another point. It must make you feel good using the trendy word of "Xenophobic", a word of which was rarely used a few years ago. Now, anyone's a Xenophobe who doesn't go along with open borders, "Free" trade, diversity, etc. It's all an effort to weaken our resolve.

Arne, don't be overcome with hatred.

399 posted on 03/28/2002 1:12:28 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
1. Appointed a diverse and highly qualified Cabinet and staff, despite the truncated transition time. African-Americans: Colin Powell (Secretary of State), Rod Paige (Secretary of Education), Condoleezza Rice (National Security Advisor) Hispanics: Mel Martinez (Housing and Urban Development), Alberto Gonzales (President's Counsel) Asian-Americans: Elaine Chao (Secretary of Labor), the Democrat (Transportation) Arab-American: Spencer Abrahams (Secretary of Energy) Lots of women, including Gale Norton at Interior and Christie Whitman at E.P.A. and Ann Veneman at Agriculture and Karen Hughes as Counselor to the President. Recently, appointed an Algerian immigrant to head NIH and an Hispanic as Surgeon General, both of who are exceptionally well qualified.

Can you explain to me why this matters? Isn't merit the objective, not Affirmative Action, of which you seem to imply is great. Oh yeah, anyone but white men. To me, this is hateful towards white men, for you are singleing them out as the individuals who aren't deserving of "diversity" status. Please, MERIT. Affirmative Action is a Left-Wing goal. It's a very perverse one.

400 posted on 03/28/2002 1:15:56 AM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-432 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson