Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun control advocate may have violated gun laws
Kentucky.com ^ | Thu, Mar. 21, 2002 | Timothy J. Burger

Posted on 03/22/2002 8:07:56 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan

WASHINGTON - Gun-control advocate Sarah Brady bought her son a powerful rifle for Christmas in 2000 - and may have skirted Delaware state background-check requirements, the New York Daily News has learned....

(Read the rest here)


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; brady
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last
To: Inspector Harry Callahan
gosh...this is too good to be true.
41 posted on 03/22/2002 8:45:45 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Thank you for posting this.

Simple truth is that the political stance she takes is the means by which she earns a very good living. Doesn't that end justify the means?

42 posted on 03/22/2002 8:48:55 AM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
Lock her up !
43 posted on 03/22/2002 8:49:17 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
"(W)hen the owner called in the checks, it seemed to me he spoke unnecessarily loudly, repeating and spelling my name over and over on the phone," Brady writes.

LOL!

"You can't purchase a gun for someone else," Sitler said yesterday. "That would be a 'straw purchase.' You've got a problem right there."

To jail Sarah Brady because she broke a law she helped pushed through would be just too poetic.

44 posted on 03/22/2002 8:50:19 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeff head
"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." - Aristotle
45 posted on 03/22/2002 8:51:41 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants;bang_list
Bang List bump
46 posted on 03/22/2002 8:51:48 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Yes, "0" tolerance........lock the fellon up for committing a straw purchase just like at gun shows she complains about.
47 posted on 03/22/2002 8:53:34 AM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"You can't purchase a gun for someone else," Sitler said yesterday. "That would be a 'straw purchase.' You've got a problem right there."

So does this mean it is illegal to give as a gift a gun which was previously purchased? If not, what difference would it make if the gun were purchased specifically as a gift?

48 posted on 03/22/2002 8:53:43 AM PST by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan

Sarah Brady: Gun Felon

Yeah, I'll be smiling about this for some time.

49 posted on 03/22/2002 8:55:32 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R2
So how does one get the Delaware Dept. of Justice to prosecute this felon, Brady?

Good question. Any Delaware Freepers know any names, addresses, phone numbers, e-mail addresses, etc.? This calls for a massive freep.

50 posted on 03/22/2002 8:56:42 AM PST by randog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Nothing will come of this. Laws do not apply to liberal democrats.
51 posted on 03/22/2002 8:56:47 AM PST by aomagrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
You back Harry ? Where ya been bud ?

Ms Potato Head needs to experience the full extent of her own work..........but we know elitism is alive an well in Amerika and that just won't happen...............

Hope your well, Stay Safe Harry !

52 posted on 03/22/2002 8:57:58 AM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
It's 10:00 am PST and the article appears to have been pulled. Either that or the server is overloaded by curiosity seekers.
53 posted on 03/22/2002 8:58:06 AM PST by aught-6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
I'm positively astounded.

Everyone, bookmark this thread right now.

54 posted on 03/22/2002 9:01:13 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aught-6
Well, at least we have two are three copies here. LOL!
55 posted on 03/22/2002 9:01:56 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Hi Squantos! I took your advice and ordered the Randall catalog. Can't make up my mind. May just go with a Model 14 with the micarta handle. Delivery date they quoted was July 2005. Sheesh!

I feel that it will be worth the wait. Been lurking over at the Randall Collector's Society. Thanks for the tip on these great knives!

Regards,
Callahan

56 posted on 03/22/2002 9:03:34 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Actually, it is completely believable. Liberals make laws for OTHER people and consider themselves exempt.
57 posted on 03/22/2002 9:03:37 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RJL
Actually, I dont't think she broke federal law. Note 1 on Form 4473 says "You are also the acutal buyer if you are acquiring the firearm as a legitimate gift for a third party."

See page 3 of form 4473 at the top under IMPORTANT NOTICES. She seems to have clearly violated Delaware law, however.

Form 4473: http://www.atf.treas.gov/forms/pdfs/f4473pt1.pdf

58 posted on 03/22/2002 9:04:37 AM PST by Eugene Tackleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
So does this mean it is illegal to give as a gift a gun which was previously purchased?

No, it comes down to intent. If I buy a gun for myself then later on decide to give it to someone else, that's legal. If I buy it with the intent of transferring it to someone else, it's a straw purchase. I actually do think that Sarah may be correct about an exemption when buying a firearm as a gift for a non-prohibited family member though, but I'm not 100% sure of that -- the BATF forms are pretty clear about buying it for yourself, and I don't think you can say "no" to that question and still buy the firearm.

59 posted on 03/22/2002 9:05:12 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Eugene Tackleberry
Good catch. I was guess I never read the compendium of notes on the form!
60 posted on 03/22/2002 9:06:08 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson