Feldman's Questions Show Defense Strategy: Dig into Damon and Brenda van Dam's Private Lives!

KNSD NBC ^ | March 19, 2002 | Lynn Stuart

[FresnoDA]

Based on the testimony the Van Dam's gave during the preliminary hearing yesterday, how responsible to you feel Brenda and Damon were in the victimization of their daughter Danielle?

Entirely

20%

Very

40%

Somewhat

19%

Slighty

6%

Not at all

15%

© 2002 Midwest Television, Inc.

[RangeRatt]

Bunny, he's one of the reasons these threads are in existance! I stand in AWE of what he has been doing in regards to this case.

[Freedom2specul8]

More sensationalist propaganda...biased radio propagating biased listeners..THAT'S all..

[Freedom2specul8]

I bet your sheriff did teach him a lesson.. LOL! Guess what kind of efforts they give if the child is 18..

[FresnoDA]

Barb on Video!! (Not like that...ha!!)

Video: Low / High
Get Media Player

VERY INTERESTING......

[RangeRatt]

and in case I haven't said this before, THANK YOU! You have not only answered the questions I have posed (even the inane ones), but have given me a better overall understanding of this case as a whole, to date.

[Freedom2specul8]

G'nite..

[RangeRatt]

sleep well.

[MizSterious]

And the wafts of Pot Smoke drifting skyward told the outside world, "We are stoned, we are stoned!!"

And there's the truth if ever there was truth. By the way, I was wondering--is it a full moon or something tonight? I think I heard the cry of the dreaded were-bore. (You know the legend of the were-bores, don't you? When the moon is full, ordinary people grow cliches and haunt the populace screeching the same old chestnuts over and over. Dread those were-bores!)

[BunnySlippers]

He said a sexual pervert entered that home..and that he more than likely has been tracking Danielle for a long time. Some of us have been saying that for a long time.

I like John Walsh, he is a wonderful victim's advocate but he is NOT infallible. One LKL just about a month ago TWICE he said that Jon Benet's father cut her down from the chiling where she was hanging from a noose ... twice. Of course, she did not die by hanging ... she was wrapped in a blanket.

I don't think the police should skim over this by not investigating the parents AT ALL. You seem to think they are completely innocent and I'm not so sure. If LE refuses to investigate the Van Dams then they are not doing their job. If Westerfield is guilty (and I think he is) he should be punished by death.

So it seems like there are a few people on this thread who become name callers if one has the gall to think the parents may well have had some complicity in this murder. You seem to want to silence people who are here merely tossing out ideas and talking about this crime.

Were you like this during the OJ trial?

[BunnySlippers]

chiling = ceiling.

[RangeRatt]

in as much as I can't answer for Kim, I haven't noticed where you were the past few nights on these van Dam Threads, but I can tell you, I was here, and things, well, they got kinda ugly. I am glad to report that we are now able to interact with each other, if not in a completely civil manner, than at least with enough humor to know when flames are being hurled and when we are just loosing a little good natured steam at someone who might not share the exact same viewpoint as we do.

'Cause is that what THIS (FR) is all about? Many people, different views, offering opinions, theories, and ideas? That's what I signed on for.

[wonders]

Easton says that it's too bad he didn't have to take the stand.

So she is a he? (Sorry, couldn't resist that one.)

[RightWingMama]

Yeah, that is awesome! I'm telling you. JW said it took what..days to get the LE off its behind?

That is usually the case. Why then did it take the cops about, what..........20 minutes to declare the Van Dams innocent?

[notpoliticallycorewrecked]

ROTFLMHO

Breaker, breaker rubber duck, com'on back!

[BunnySlippers]

in as much as I can't answer for Kim, I haven't noticed where you were the past few nights on these van Dam Threads, but I can tell you, I was here, and things, well, they got kinda ugly.

I was here and checked in on the Van Dam thread as I do every night ... Fresno had pinged me. Yes, noticed the nastiness and didn't post on the thread.

I don't agree with everything every single poster on any thread says ... but I don't understand why there are two or three on these threads who can't bear that someone might feel differently. I do know that there are people who are reluctant to post knowing they are going to be bashed.

[BunnySlippers]

Why then did it take the cops about, what..........20 minutes to declare the Van Dams innocent?

The Van Dam's had to submit to polygraphs before LE said they were not suspects.

[RangeRatt]

well, glad to have you along. I have posted what I thought were either "dumb" questions, or, in some cases, thoroughly inane comments, not afraid of getting bashed, but instead, to turn attention away from those getting bashed. I don't like that any more than you do, I sure, but I wouldn't avoid posting for that reason.

I find very few things shocking anymore, but this crime is one of them, and I want to know everything about it that is available. Viva Free Republic!!!!

[rolling_stone]

Police say the alarm was not set, but the panel is a type that indicates when doors and windows are opened and shut at all times.

Whoops I missed this so my theory about setting the alarms needs reconsidering..seems to me if the lights and beeps come on ALL the time with a breach then with the kids and dog and all their vistors, that thing would go off constantly to the point of driving someone crazay and making them ignore it......strange...

[BunnySlippers]

Whoops I missed this so my theory about setting the alarms needs reconsidering...

During the third preliminary hearing Damon Van Dam said he had tested the alarm panel after the abduction. If a child's magnet was placed against the alarm that it would somehow impair it's function. I don't know alarms well enough to speak on this issue. Anyone here have experience with this?