[BunnySlippers]

He said a sexual pervert entered that home..and that he more than likely has been tracking Danielle for a long time. Some of us have been saying that for a long time.

I like John Walsh, he is a wonderful victim's advocate but he is NOT infallible. One LKL just about a month ago TWICE he said that Jon Benet's father cut her down from the chiling where she was hanging from a noose ... twice. Of course, she did not die by hanging ... she was wrapped in a blanket.

I don't think the police should skim over this by not investigating the parents AT ALL. You seem to think they are completely innocent and I'm not so sure. If LE refuses to investigate the Van Dams then they are not doing their job. If Westerfield is guilty (and I think he is) he should be punished by death.

So it seems like there are a few people on this thread who become name callers if one has the gall to think the parents may well have had some complicity in this murder. You seem to want to silence people who are here merely tossing out ideas and talking about this crime.

Were you like this during the OJ trial?

[BunnySlippers]

chiling = ceiling.

[RangeRatt]

in as much as I can't answer for Kim, I haven't noticed where you were the past few nights on these van Dam Threads, but I can tell you, I was here, and things, well, they got kinda ugly. I am glad to report that we are now able to interact with each other, if not in a completely civil manner, than at least with enough humor to know when flames are being hurled and when we are just loosing a little good natured steam at someone who might not share the exact same viewpoint as we do.

'Cause is that what THIS (FR) is all about? Many people, different views, offering opinions, theories, and ideas? That's what I signed on for.

[Freedom2specul8]

No...and the earlier threads explain it all...

[homeschool mama]

My thoughts exactly.