The country club boys have a lock on it, and it would be easier to build a new party from the ground up than to tear down the Republican establishment that would fight you tooth and nail. You would have to rebuild the GOP on a pile of ashes after you got them out.
I campaigned for W, but are you aware that a Bush or a Dole has been on EVERY republican Presidential ticket since 1976? I find that astounding evidence that it is a big insiders club. True conservatives are independent thinks and will never make the inside of this club.
Sure, keep working for conservative Republicans every chance you get. Work hard for W in 2004. They will hold the line somewhat until we can build up the Constitution party.
We have six years to get a viable Constitition party going in every state. The next GOP presidential candidate will be much more liberal than W and we will truly have no choice otherwise.
http://www.constitutionparty.com
I am irate at Teeny Tom Dasshole, Leaky Leahy, and others of this ilk for their lynching of good judicial nominations. A protest vote for a miniscule third party at this juncture seems to me to be throwing away any chance for causing the ship of state to move to the right.
I'd only disagree that RINOs need to be confronted and opposed in all venues.
A: Convince the Chinese RINOs are aphrodisiacs; They'll be hunted to extinction.
<\lame humor>
When George Bush was my Governor before he became
our President he had that example on his website to explain that
the Party was like a Baseball team in the children's section.
Great Minds think alike Dan from Michigan
Here here!!! People forget that last Nov. we weren't only electing a Chief Exec; we were electing a judiciary and a Fed Gov beauracracy. BTW, the libs and socialists never forget this. As I recall they were the only ones to mention judicial appointments during the campaign (and they stick to their guns, as the Pickering "veto" proves). They may scream bloody murder over passage of welfare reform, but they would never vote against Bubba because of it.
Of course philosophy is always involved in politics, but when it comes to pulling the lever, the art of practical reason (and if need be, "nose-holding") is paramount.
Of course, there would be less nose-holding if we could get our guys in at the local level--I totally agree with you there. We could also use a conservative "counter march" through the institutions.
You have it right about the little races, too. Look at Florida in '00. We found out graphically why the Dims fight like tigers over "unimportant" local elections-those "Assistant County Whatevers" may be the ones counting votes someday, and appointing their buds to other jobs as well. This is where the party apparatus comes in, especially in a crisis situation. Remember old Carol Roberts of Palm Beach fame? Remember how much of a nuisance she made herself for the Dims? Prior to that election, no one ever heard of her or cared what party she belonged too. Oh, and she may run for Congress, either state or Federal. The Dims reward good commissars.
Voting Libertarian or Constitution won't help anything, sorry guys, but that's the truth. The list of what third party voting actually leads to is both long and ugly. Cantwell, Stabenow, Bubba(x2!), this is NOT progress to Constitutional ideals, fellas.
Dan makes many good points. Today's town councilor might be next week's Senator or President. The traffic court judge might someday be one of the Brethren. This is where to start, and where to make a difference, instead of crying AFTER the fact.
You are right to encourage conservatives to get involved with the party organization. I don't think that Rinos in Congress are the problem. The problem is that party establishment. Washington, inside the beltway, we know better than you, attitude that's the problem. We need people who realize that the conservative message can be very attractive.
The reason why minoritys vote democratic in such large numbers is because the Repubs in power think that you have to act like a liberal demo to get their vote. I remember last election the "republican outreach" to minorities included a radio ad which apologized for republican past actions. What @#$%#@@$! Instead of accepting and pandering to rat lies. Republicans should champion their history as defenders of human rights. And explain how the conservative agenda will help the poor. It's the Democrats who should apologize.
Yeah... don't you just miss that inspiring leadership of Trent Lott when he was Majority Leader?
Yep.
And in a lotta places, where you have eternal DeomcRAT candidates holding offfice, a conservative Republican doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning. Period.
That is why the GOP fields these RINOs. They think, "Well, at least this guy (or gal) might have a chance against thes demos.
Well, they don't, but that's why it happens, I think.
And, once in a while, they win, and that's how we end up with them.
Two words: Elect Nader.
Tell that to the Hildebeast.