Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Panel Rejects Pickering
Yahoo/AP ^ | March.14,2002 | Jesse J.Holland

Posted on 03/14/2002 2:39:32 PM PST by Reagan Man

WASHINGTON - The Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee voted along party lines Thursday to kill the nomination of Judge Charles Pickering to the appeals court, handing President Bush a stinging defeat in a racially-charged confirmation battle.

In a series of roll calls, the panel also snubbed Bush's request to allow a vote in the full Senate on Pickering, a 64-year-old Mississippian with more than a decade on the bench.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-243 next last
To: Reagan Man
Isn't the congress set to take a break for Easter?? If so, can Bush make a recess appointment and put Pickering in without Congress approval?? Does anybody know??
181 posted on 03/14/2002 6:15:15 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GB
"... he's not been a 100 percenter on a lot of things."

LOL That's an understatement! I must admit that I have mixed feelings about some of the things he's done, and some he may do. But, this is an election year...and, you have to admit, he has co-opted the dems issues. They have been left with nothing...and that makes me happy.

182 posted on 03/14/2002 6:16:03 PM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
Sign PETITION to SUPPORT Judge Pickering...
183 posted on 03/14/2002 6:17:37 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Already done!

BTW, WELCOME HOME!!!

184 posted on 03/14/2002 6:22:17 PM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
There's nothing he could have done, campaign-wise.

Okay. But there is something he could have done after the campaign and it would have been all together legal. Ashcroft should have challenged the appointment of Jean Carnahan. She had no right to that Senate seat. She wasn't on the ballot, her husband was. Then he died in the plane crash. With his opponent dead, the seat belonged to John Ashcroft. Ashcroft's decision not to challenge it was plain dumb. We should just forget about the past and look towards November on this.

Are you sure about that?

One thing I've learned in life, don't make the same mistake a second time. Moving forward is one thing, forgetting the past is another and forgetting the past in this case is wrong.

185 posted on 03/14/2002 6:27:12 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: RodgerD
Put down the Bush administration all you want - but I'm about ready to give up on it all, unless the Conservatives can get their act together. My impression is it's your way or let the USA go to hell. No wonder we're so despised!
186 posted on 03/14/2002 6:27:21 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
We MUST not give up on this.... Keep the pressure on YOUR Senators to bring this vote to the FLOOR for a vote by the FULL senate !!!

DO NOT allow Sen. Leheay and his fellow LIBERALS on the Judiciary Committee to prevent this vote from going to the floor!!!

Sign PETITION to SUPPORT Judge Pickering...

187 posted on 03/14/2002 6:28:13 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Bump!

<--- Click Here to join the Free Republic Network and the First Amendment Action Network!

Tweak the Beak for a THRILL!

188 posted on 03/14/2002 6:28:44 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; Reagan Man
everything ANYONE did way back when can be labelled as "the reason why we don't control the Senate today."

The person who shifted power in the Senate has a name, and it is Jeffords. Lay your anger where it belongs, at the feet of the backstabber and traitor.

189 posted on 03/14/2002 6:30:47 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
We MUST not give up on this.... Keep the pressure on YOUR Senators to bring this vote to the FLOOR for a vote by the FULL senate !!!

DO NOT allow Sen. Leheay and his fellow LIBERALS on the Judiciary Committee to prevent this vote from going to the floor!!!

Sign PETITION to SUPPORT Judge Pickering...

190 posted on 03/14/2002 6:32:46 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
One year from now the Rats will not be in control of the Senate.

And what are you doing to prevent that? This is not a jibe; it is a for real question. Each of us must take responsibility not just to talk the talk, but walk the walk.
As in walking precincts to get information out, manning phone banks to get the vote out, and sending money to run campaigns.

The socialists are more dedicated than you and I are.

191 posted on 03/14/2002 6:34:08 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Brundledan
>>>This isn't the first time he's displayed this kind of cowardice...<<<

Cowardice? Come on, get real!

>>>It's what bullies do to those who show weakness.<<<

President Bush hasn't shown any weakness.

>>>If George W. Bush knows what's good for him - and the country - he had better grow a spine, quick.<<<

Are we talking about the same George W.Bush, whose sitting at 80+% in the polls? Grow a spine? President Bush is tough as teflon coated leather. I think you're hyperventilating a bit. Calm down, someone might take you for a 'Bush Basher'.

192 posted on 03/14/2002 6:35:25 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Keep the pressure on YOUR Senators

My Senators are Feinstein and Boxer. If I call Feinstein that just proves to her that Pickering is a "divisive" nomination and that was her "reason" for voting against him. And Boxer is a communist.

Besides, the last time I emailed Feinstein was over the EP-3 incident with China, and I think I told her she was dog shit for kowtowing in fear to the ChiComs before letting our President and Commander in Chief handle the situation.
I don't think I'm on her invitation list for her next tea party.

193 posted on 03/14/2002 6:40:57 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Choozer
If Zell Miller switched parties McCain would switch about an hour later. And if Breaux switched Collins of Maine would switch about an hour later. The repubs are going to have to win big in November to have a "switch proof" Senate.
194 posted on 03/14/2002 6:41:31 PM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court,and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."
Article II, Section 2, US Constitution
Nothing there about a committee - Senate would mean all 100 senators.
195 posted on 03/14/2002 6:42:10 PM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Very good point! I should put that up as "Thanks to the Libertarians" we have the RATS in charge. Hope they are happy because I certainly am not. And their candidates didn't even get elected -- just got enough votes to get ours defeated! Thanks for the reminder!
196 posted on 03/14/2002 6:43:03 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
Why am I pissed about this? Well, it's a lesson in why we're called the stupid party.

I agree with you. There is some truth in what you say. The Democrats are much better at that type of infighting. Too often, Republicans have a habit of shooting themselves in the foot. We must stay focused.

197 posted on 03/14/2002 6:43:49 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Excellent points!
198 posted on 03/14/2002 6:45:32 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
So are we going to refer to this kind of thing as 'Jeffordsing' or 'Pickering(ing)' like is done with Robert Bork?

How about:
We will remember [Pickering] in November!

199 posted on 03/14/2002 6:45:34 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
If so, can Bush make a recess appointment and put Pickering in without Congress approval??

I think Bush can and I think he might.

200 posted on 03/14/2002 6:48:43 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson