Posted on 03/08/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by sarcasm
Friday, March 08, 2002 - WASHINGTON - Rep. Tom Tancredo takes credit for thwarting the Bush administration's last effort to offer partial amnesty to thousands of illegal residents, but Thursday the outspoken immigration foe said he may have been outmaneuvered by the White House.
President Bush has struck a deal with the House leadership to place legislation that offers an extension of amnesty on its consent calendar before Bush heads to Mexico for a state visit next week, the Colorado Republican said. That action should ensure quick House passage of legislation that Bush has repeatedly sought from Congress. It would allow an undocumented person to receive legal standing, such as a valid green card, by filing a declaration with the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It presumably also would require the person to have been in the United States by a certain date and have filed a declaration with the INS from an appropriate sponsor, such as a relative or employer, and pay a $1,000 penalty. "The terms are still up in the air," said Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration, a group that has been allied with Tancredo. "We've heard to the effect that the president wants something to bring down to Mexico." The initial Bush proposal, designed exclusively for Mexicans, once was high on the president's legislative wish list, but it was delayed after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11. However, as the president noted Wednesday in a speech to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, he now is pushing for the extension of the amnesty program known by the section of immigration law that covers it, Section 245I. The president hailed it as a way to reunite family, separated by the border. "If you believe in family values, if you understand the worth of family and the importance of family, let's get 245I out of the United States Congress and give me a chance to sign it," Bush told the chamber members. Tancredo, the head of a congressional caucus on immigration issues and proponent of halting virtually all immigration, said he had blocked a previous attempt by Bush to push an extension of the amnesty program through the House. But this time, he said House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., had agreed to place the issue on the suspension, or consent, calendar, making it difficult to defeat the proposal. The Senate might be more favorable to the bill than the House, expanding the numbers of individuals who can apply, Tancredo said.
Bush: Marijuana Laws Up To The States
The Washington Times
Inside Politics
October 21, 1999
Bush's stance on pot
Presidential hopeful George W. Bush says it's up to the states to decide whether marijuana can be prescribed as a medicine, a stance that puts him at odds with Republicans on Capitol Hill, the Dallas Morning News reports. "I believe each state can choose that decision as they so choose," the Texas governor said recently in Seattle in response to a reporter's question.
A spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project, a medical-marijuana lobbying group, praised Mr. Bush as "courageous" and "consistent on states' rights," and "an example for Republicans in Congress."
[End of transcript]
George W. Bush's DEA Head Asa Hutchinson's Agents Raid Medical Marijuana Club
Asa Hutchinson shuts down the largest drug-trafficking case in the history of the Republic
Asa Hutchinson May Become Bush's Attorney General - February 27, 2000
George W. Bush Picks Asa Hutchinson To Head DEA
THE ORAL DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM C. DUNCAN
"9 Q. And it has been alleged that the Central Intelligence
10 Agency had some role in that operation. Is that the same
11 operation that you investigated?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. And when you submitted the witnesses, the names of the
14 prospective witnesses to the U. S. Attorney in Arkansas, are you
15 referring to Mr. -- what was the name of the U. S. Attorney?
16 A. Asa Hutchinson.
...15 A. They were very frustrated, also. Mr. Whitmore, in fact,
16 made several trips to Fort Smith, Arkansas to complain to the
17 U. S. Attorney's Office.
18 Q. Did he relate to you the conversation he had had with the
19 U. S. Attorney?
20 A. On several occasions, and also related to me that the U.S.
21 Attorney wrote him a letter telling him not to come to his
22 office anymore complaining, that that was unprofessional
23 behavior.
24 Q. What was the conclusion of Mr. Whitmore concerning your
25 investigation and the manner in which it was handled by the U. S.
1 Attorney in Arkansas?
2 A. That there was a coverup.
3 Q. Are you saying -- do you agree with his-with Mr.
4 Whitmore's conclusion?
5 A. Absolutely.
6 Q. Are you stating now under oath that you believe that the
7 investigation in and around the Mena Airport of money laundering
8 was covered up by the U. S. Attorney in Arkansas?
9 A. It was covered up,"
BUSHMAN COURT REPORTING, INC.
(501) 372-5115
[END OF PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT]
THE ORAL DEPOSITION OF RUSSELL FRANKLIN WELCH - Re: Asa Hutchinson
"10 I remember when he came in as U. S. Attorney, everybody was
11 really relieved in western Arkansas because we had had some
12 uneventful prosecutions prior to that apparently. And he did a
13 good job. He had a lot of prosecutions. Well liked.
14 My first uncomfortable experience was at the first grand
15 jury session concerning money laundering where two witnesses,
16 Jim Nugent and Kathy Corrigan, testified, and I was up there
17 just for moral support more than anything else, and to see what
18 was going on . And after they came out of the -- out of their
19 session with the grand jury, each individually expressed concern
20 to Bill Duncan that they were disappointed, that they hadn't
21 been asked the proper questions. They didn't like what happened
22 to them in the grand jury room. And that concerned me a little
23 at the time. But Bill Duncan, I remember him telling them not
24 to worry, that Asa Hutchinson knows what he's doing, and that
25 there's a reason for what -- the way he's handling this. And Page 21
1 they tentatively accepted that. That was my first concern. But
2 based on what Bill told them, I felt a little better about the
3 situation. And I don't know what happened at the grand jury,
4 when they said they didn't feel like they were asked the
5 questions that they had been led to believe were the pertinent
6 ones for their testimony.
7Shortly after that -- I believe that's the last session I
8 can remember that Asa Hutchinson held with the grand jury
9 concerning this investigation. Shortly after that, I learned
10 that he was quitting his position and was going to run for some
11 political office, and that Mike Fitzhugh would be taking over."
Mena: The Oral Deposition of Richard J. Brenneke
By Mara Leveritt
Feb. 12, 1999
Last week I suggested that, rather than probing ad nauseum the president's lies about his extra-marital alliance(s), Washington could do us a favor by turning its investigative lights onto a question with some genuine national significance, to wit:
Precisely what was the relationship between various branches of the government, particularly the CIA, and this country's super-cocaine kingpins, such as Arkansas's own Barry Seal, during the 1980s?
The column did not exactly provoke a stampede to pick up the gauntlet. As I had outlined, there are powerful, bipartisan reasons why the questions about Seal have languished.
Republicans don't want to touch them for fear of where the answers might lead. The trail already points to the offices of former presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush.
Likewise, Democrats are not keen on kicking up a lot of dirt about Barry Seal, a major cocaine smuggler who, for reasons that remain a mystery, was allowed to base his multi-million-dollar operation in Arkansas, under the very eye of the Arkansas State Police, for four years while Bill Clinton was governor.
What did happen after that column appeared was that a reader called to remind me of the role played in the Seal saga by our own Republican Congressman Asa Hutchinson, the House manager who has been lately so aggressive in his prosecution of Clinton in the Senate.
Having listened to Hutchinson expound repeatedly on his desire only to get at "the truth" of the Clinton-Lewinsky affair, I am struck (as was my caller) by how remarkably unaggressive he was -- in fact, how surprisingly hands-off he was -- back in the 1980s when, as the U.S. attorney for western Arkansas, Hutchinson had the chance to prosecute Seal, the smuggler.
We now know that during the time that Seal headquartered his operation at Mena he was being watched by U.S. Customs officials, as well as by agents for the DEA, the FBI, and the IRS. Former IRS agent William Duncan has testified that Hutchinson, who was among the first to know of Seal's arrival in Arkansas, called a meeting in early 1983, at which Duncan was assigned to investigate Seal's suspected money laundering. Duncan did, and he tried to have members of Seal's gang indicted.
But when the IRS investigator asked Hutchinson to subpoena 20 witnesses who were prepared to testify about the alleged drug-trafficking at Mena, Hutchinson balked. Only three of the 20 were called, and of those, two later complained that they had not been allowed to present their evidence to the federal grand jury. The grand jury never indicted Seal or anyone else involved with him at Mena.
In 1991, five years after Seal was murdered, Duncan testified about his experience. "Are you stating now under oath that you believe that the investigation in and around the Mena airport of money laundering was covered up by the U.S. Attorney in Arkansas," he was asked. "It was covered up," he said.
Since then, I have spoken with Paul Whitmore, a former Chief of Criminal Investigation for the IRS, who was Duncan's superior. He oversaw the Seal investigation and concurs with Duncan's assessment that presentation of Duncan's evidence was blocked by Hutchinson's office.
At the time, and to this day, however, Hutchinson has cast himself as an anti-drug crusader. In light of that, I wrote to him after his election to Congress. I explained that I have had a Freedom of Information request pertaining to Barry Seal before the FBI for several years -- a request that the FBI has acknowledged should have been filled a long time ago. In light of that, I asked Hutchinson if he would intercede on my behalf to get the records released.
I was curious as to how hard Hutchinson would work to bring to light public records about a politically sensitive investigation in which he had played a significant part. As it turned out, he was not helpful at all. He replied that he had contacted the FBI concerning my request and that when he heard back from the agency he would "be back in touch" with me. That was more than a year ago. He has not been "back in touch."
By contrast, Rep. Vic Snyder, to whom I placed the same request, has been diligent in his support of my appeal. It seems to matter to Snyder that the Justice Department can flaunt a federal law, delaying by years, if it wants, the release of public information. The agency still hasn't budged on the Seal records, but Snyder's push for their release distinguishes him in this otherwise dark affair.
As for Hutchinson I hope that some day he is held to account, as he would hold Clinton to account, for certain events of the past -- events that even this self-proclaimed seeker of truth might prefer would never come to light.
Copyright ©1998 Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc.
[End of Transcript]
"The government of the United States was an active participant in one of the largest dope operations in the world.."
Jim Johnson - ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.
"Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been, and ever will of civil society. It ever has been, and ever will be pursued, until it be obtained, or until liberty be lost in the pursuit."
James Madison, Federalist Paper No.51
HERE WE GO AGAIN
245 I COMES UP TOMORROW, TUESDAY, MAY 14!
FROM A PRO-IMMIGRATION WEB PAGE
³Rep. Serrano (D-NY) will reportedly offer an amendment to the "must-pass" fiscal 2002 emergency supplemental appropriations bill for a permanent extension of 245(i) when the House Appropriations Committee meets on Tuesday, May 14th. There is apparently considerable opposition to this idea. Reportedly, the Senate Bill (S. 2493) for an extension of 245(i) up to April 30, 2003 is what many Democrats are pinning their hopes on. It may ultimately come down to whether President Bush is able to sway members of his party in the House.²
SEE
http://www.ilw.com/lawyers/immigdaily/digest/2002,0514.shtm
TAKE ACTION NOW AGAINST THE LATEST BUSH AMNESTY ATTEMPT.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Members of the House Appropriations Committee from your state need to hear from you fist thing tomorrow morning!
To find the members of the Appropriations Committee, go to
http://www.house.gov/appropriations/members.htm
Contact the Congress Toll Free
877) 762-8762 -- (800) 648-3516
FREE FAX
To send a free fax, go to
http://www.NumbersUSA.com/fax
glenn@americanpatrol.com
I agree.
Even if terrorism didn't exist, how many millions upon millions more are American's expected to absorb, while our landfills are full, our social services are being choked off, our jails are full, our wages are being lowered while our taxes routinely raised, many big city ERs are standing room only, our energy resources are strained etc etc.
How many millions more are we expected to take?
"Fox envisioned an agreement legalizing millions of undocumented Mexican laborers in the United States."
"The immigration issue is crucial to Mexico, which receives more than $9 billion a year from Mexicans in the United States sending money home."
From Mexico Leader feels 'abandoned' by U.S.
========================================
Debbie Schlussel, Schlussel: Will America Be the Next France?:
"President Bush is a little too comfortable with radical Islamists who support free immigration to the U.S. with subversive motives. Like he said, Youre either on our side or the terrorists side.
"I know on which side Congressman Tancredo is. The question is, on whose side is President Bush?"
====================================
245(i) not only affects illegals from Mexico, it affects illegals from all over the world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.