Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Releases 5 Security Camera Pics of Plane Hitting Pentagon
FOX News ^ | March 7, 2002 | John Gibson

Posted on 03/07/2002 1:15:17 PM PST by codebreaker

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:32:44 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Just saw them on air, you can see the tail of the plane in the 2nd photo.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airseclist; anamericansoldier; bushdoctrineunfold; clashofcivilizatio; conspiracy; historylist; terrorwar; virginia; warlist; washingtondc; wtcattacks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-343 next last
To: demdesur
Maybe next time they'll have a high speed camera there, just for you.

I'd cough up the $20 if I were you. Donate it in my name Bubba.

121 posted on 03/07/2002 2:58:37 PM PST by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: fnord
ATTU ALEUTIAN ISLAND OF ALASKA IS THE WESTERN MOST PART OF AMERICA, accroding to the travelogue 'causing the International Date Line to make a big jag to the west..'

Are some of the Pentagon clocks working off the missiles stationed in the most forward time zone?

122 posted on 03/07/2002 2:59:57 PM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: demdesur
There were dozens of eyewitnesses who saw a plane hit the Pentagon. Are they all lying?
123 posted on 03/07/2002 3:00:18 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: archy
I dunno, arcy. That photo with the 'tail section' at the rear of the fireball, doesn't LOOK like a tail section. It looks like the trees/shrubbery in the distance. Any threads/articles that discuss the angle that the plane hit the Pentagon at, or the location of the first 'strike'???

I doubt if the date is a major issue. From what I can remember of second-hand 'experience' with govt/military....the rules are... 'looks good on paper' and 'good enough for govt work. (ahem)

124 posted on 03/07/2002 3:01:05 PM PST by mommadooo3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: michigander
There's the plane (it was moving quite fast).

I thought it was the white blur beside that first toll box...but it is wavy sort of, and small to be the plane...

125 posted on 03/07/2002 3:02:59 PM PST by dubyagee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: demdesur
Sometimes I wonder if people try playing devil's advocate, and eventually fool themselves into believing what is an absolutely ludicrous position.

You wanted to know if someone actually saw the plane, rather than just the explosion. One of the most trustworthy people our family knows saw the plane. Hundreds of others have seen the plane. Apparently that's not good enough for you, and you find it necessary to persist in a line of discussion that earns Free Republic photo montages on people's websites that include tin foil and glasses held together by masking tape.
126 posted on 03/07/2002 3:03:32 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
I don't know and I'm not sure I want to.
127 posted on 03/07/2002 3:03:38 PM PST by demdesur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Bump!
128 posted on 03/07/2002 3:04:57 PM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Yea, I'm sure the Pentagon security system is made up of $20 web cams.
129 posted on 03/07/2002 3:06:12 PM PST by demdesur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: TomB;radioastronomer
It seems like I've heard these arguments before. The moon hoax conspirists bring up the same arguments. Interesting.....
130 posted on 03/07/2002 3:08:08 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Great argument dude... the grass doesn't look like a plane it... let's bring up the moon hoax! LMAO
131 posted on 03/07/2002 3:09:47 PM PST by demdesur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: demdesur
It's more complelling than "I don't know and I'm not sure I want to know".

Why don't you peddle your drivel somewhere else?

132 posted on 03/07/2002 3:11:38 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Personally I don't care what date/time is on those pictures. 189 people died in that crash. I pray that Barbara and the others were sheltered in the safety and love of God's arms at the moment of impact. Forgive me, but I cannot wish the same for the hi-jackers that were on board. May they rot in hell.
133 posted on 03/07/2002 3:12:42 PM PST by barker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Get your TIN FOIL BEANIES.......here.
134 posted on 03/07/2002 3:13:23 PM PST by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: fnord

135 posted on 03/07/2002 3:13:28 PM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: demdesur
What is your guess as to the airspeed if a plane did impact the pentagon as described?
300-400 mph?
How much would a camera cost that could have taped the impact without a mere blur?
136 posted on 03/07/2002 3:14:16 PM PST by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
It seems like I've heard these arguments before. The moon hoax conspirists bring up the same arguments. Interesting.....

WHAT! I am not in any way saying it was not 9/11. What I was referring to was the 8-hour disparity in time. All I was suggesting was that the clock may have been set in Zulu instead of local. OK I will now take the time to check the time offset between the two. It makes me quite angry to be lumped in with the conspiracy/moon hoax people!

137 posted on 03/07/2002 3:15:12 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
OK lets call everyone.

Someone put up a picture of the Pentagon with the plane sticking out of it, something that clearly shows the plane or part of it.

Any takers?

138 posted on 03/07/2002 3:15:38 PM PST by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
I'll let others make up their mind on that.

It is not irrational to not want to know if the Pentagon pulled a rope-a-dope.

Bottom line is there is no evidence a plane hit the Pentagon.

Any intel operation can come up with fake witnesses... to date a witness has seen the explosion and a witness has seen a plane above a golf course... but if you are telling me that there were no parts of the plane or pictures of the plane that hit the Pentagon I'd have to say you have lost your mind mate. I'm outta here... I'll believe it when I SEE it.

139 posted on 03/07/2002 3:16:24 PM PST by demdesur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Americas own "English Channel". I wonder if someday the atheist and commie hordes will cross it.
140 posted on 03/07/2002 3:16:49 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-343 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson