Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apparent Remains Of Danielle Found: (11:00 P.M. Update)
Union Trib ^ | February 27, 2002 11:00 P.M. | Jeffrey J. Ros

Posted on 02/27/2002 10:38:50 PM PST by FresnoDA

Apparent remains of Danielle found



'It is a high probability it is her,' police sayDanielle van Dam


SIGNONSANDIEGO

February 27, 2002

EL CAJON – The remains of a young girl were discovered Wednesday afternoon off Dehesa Road near the Singing Hills golf course by searchers looking for 7-year-old Danielle van Dam, missing from her home for more than three weeks.

"It is a high probability it is her," said Lt. Jim Collins, a San Diego police investigator at the scene.

Forensic investigators photographed the scene, and other evidence collection was expected to continue through the night as lighting equipment and generators were brought in. Authorities said it was likely that the body would not be recovered until Thursday.

The remains were found 25 to 30 feet off the road among a cluster of oak trees in a grassy area, across from a quarry east of the Singing Hills Resort and Country Club.

A group of searchers from the Danielle Recovery Center discovered the body after 2 p.m. and immediately called sheriff's deputies, saying they believed they had discovered the girl, Collins said.

"Obviously we appreciate the effort of the volunteers," he said. "This shows the volunteers are a very vital part of the overall process. They can cover much more area than we can."

Jeff Dusek, the lead prosecutor in the case against David Westerfield, the man accused of kidnapping and murdering Danielle, went to the scene. The primary police homicide unit investigating Danielle's disappearance had been in the desert during the day but traveled to the discovery area.

Authorities closed Dehesa Road for a time, diverting traffic at Willow Glen and Harbison Canyon roads.

Capt. Ron Newman, head of the San Diego police homicide unit, visited Danielle's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, at their home in Sabre Springs. Later, a priest visited. The parents made no immediate statements.

San Diego Police Chief David Bejarano described the body found as that of a 3- to 4-foot white female with blond hair visible from the back, wearing a plastic necklace similar to that seen in photos of Danielle. One earring was visible, which appeared to be the same type of earring Danielle was reported to be wearing the night of Feb. 1 when she disappeared.

Bejarano, speaking at a downtown news conference Wednesday night, said it likely would be at least 24 hours before a positive identification was made using dental records, and if that wasn't possible an identification using DNA would take three to four days.

No weapons that might have been used in the victim's death were apparent at the scene, Bejarano said.

District Attorney Paul Pfingst, who joined Bejarano at the news conference, said the investigators' preliminary assessment was that the victim had been killed elsewhere and the body dumped at the site.


DAVID HARDMAN / Union-Tribune
Parts of the body were in an advanced state of decomposition, Pfingst said, and earlier reports that the body may have been partly burned likely were in error.

Discovery of what likely is Danielle's body changes the nature of the case against Westerfield, Pfingst said.

"The body is the most fertile source of clues," he said.

The district attorney said the investigation at the scene would take time.

"At this point speed is not an issue," Pfingst said. "We'd rather do it right than do it fast."

Westerfield, 50, a neighbor of the van Dams, pleaded not guilty Tuesday to charges of murder, kidnap and possession of child pornography in connection with Danielle's disappearance. A judge Wednesday morning ordered the search warrants in the case unsealed.

Westerfield, a self-employed engineer, was arrested Friday outside his attorney's office after weeks of being labeled a potential suspect in the case by police. He is being held in the county jail downtown without bond.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-299 next last
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Questions...that is what we are asking. Nothing more, nothing less than we should be doing. What went on in that house from that night till the next morning should be questioned. The circumstances that led up to Westerfields gaining undetected access to that home are legitimate issues and the key to the child's abduction.

sw

141 posted on 02/28/2002 7:25:02 AM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA,wirestripper,Redcloak,crystalk
Now that they have a body they can really get to the root to who was responsible for this by the victimology.

The location of the dump site shows that the individual is a disorganized killer. The perp took the time to move the body to a remote area yet didn't do anything to hide the body once it was dumped (This is assuming that animals didnt dig her up). This could even be a case where the perp didn't have any intension of killing Danielle. The intension could have been just a sexual assault that go out of hand as the killer tried to manafest their fantasy. (Don't get me wrong, if his intension was not to kill that doesn't make it OK).

In most cases where a family member is involved in the crime the body will have been covered in someway. This is a subconscience method of remorse or even a parental instinct at times. If the killer depersonalized the victim then they will tend to not cover the body. They dispose of the victim as if they were throwing away trash (This is because they no longer veiw the victim as human.)

As to the length of time it took to find the body, all I can say is have you ever dropped a screw or an earring on the carpet. It can be a nightmare to find sometimes. Same thing here.

These are just some observations a have from following this tragedy. A good book to read that gives some insight into how these sickos think is Mind Hunter by John Douglas.

If we know what to look for we can protect out children and prevent these things from happening as often.
142 posted on 02/28/2002 7:26:38 AM PST by CougarGA7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
Yep. I'm wondering if the father had much *more* to do with this than we realize.

I understand that the trial will be televised. I expect we will hear much about both parents and what they were doing that night. I imagine that will open up revelations about this couple that will not be flattering, to say the least.

Since all it takes is one juror to find "reasonable doubt", the van Dams behavior may well be the defense attorney's best friend.

I just wonder how much the judge will allow and if it will ultimately cast suspicion on the parents as well. The movements of all parties involved that evening will be interesting to hear. If the parents are caught in any kind of lie, all bets are off for an easy conviction.

Don't get me wrong. I want Westerfield to fry if he's guilty, but I think this case promises to be it's own soap opera.

143 posted on 02/28/2002 7:28:47 AM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
A lot is going to come out in the trial. Westerfield's attorney is right now planning his defense, and that will involve pushing some of the guilt off onto the parents. I would not be at all surprised to hear a defense based on (and I'm donning my tin-foil hat) Westerfield trying to "rescue" Danielle from a household that where the parents were into swinging, possibly even involving her, that Danielle became frightened, started to scream, and he tried to calm her down, but accidentally killed her.

Bizarre theory? Yes, but in light of everything we've seen in the past few years from OJ to Clinton to Condit - nothing would surprise me. Disgust me, but not surprise me.

144 posted on 02/28/2002 7:30:27 AM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7
The location of the dump site shows that the individual is a disorganized killer.

Couldn't it be that he just wanted the body found?

145 posted on 02/28/2002 7:33:30 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: lady reaper
Appreciate the kind remarks.
146 posted on 02/28/2002 7:34:35 AM PST by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Woodstock
Good post. BTTT!
147 posted on 02/28/2002 7:37:14 AM PST by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
It could be, but I think if that was the case then the body would have been dumped right next to the road. An example I can think of is the Trail Side Strangler. He would dump the bodies right next to the road and pose them. That's another thing that tells me this is a disorganized killer. I haven't heard anything about the body being posed which is common when the perp is organized.
148 posted on 02/28/2002 7:37:16 AM PST by CougarGA7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
I thought I remembered reading somewhere that one of the earrings was in her bedroom....

Thanks. If you're right, then the "missing" earring doesn't tell them much.

And if you think you read it, then you probably did. This is the first article I've read about the murder. Due to time constraints, I've had to rely on the TV sound bytes for news about this.

149 posted on 02/28/2002 7:38:24 AM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
If you saw the video of them at the arraignment, you would have seen Brenda in the arms of the woman next to her and Damon, her husband, sitting there like a stupid duck. (I can't say what I really think of him.)

There is something wrong with these people. I just can't figure them out.

Interesting thought: Why did Westerfield leave his home at 9:30am if he had Danielle in his RV. Why take the chance that the VD's would do a neighborhood search and find her there???? It doesn't make sense...

150 posted on 02/28/2002 7:39:06 AM PST by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
...you have no idea what the family is going through and people who make judgements on these parents saddens me horribly.

I agree. Add to that the fact that both parents probably have enough sedatives in them by now to paralyze a water buffalo,and it absolutely boggles the mind that so many FR posters want to add to their burden with these insane allegations of guilt. I am ashamed to think that people might read their posts and assume I agree with that insanity,so I speak out against it. The mean,evil,and nasty side of Republicans is being exposed here,and tells us all a lot about why people who SHOULD be on our side hesitate to join us.

151 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:52 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: It's me
Interesting thought: Why did Westerfield leave his home at 9:30am if he had Danielle in his RV. Why take the chance that the VD's would do a neighborhood search and find her there???? It doesn't make sense...

That is an interesting thought. Also how would he have known that the family would not be aware of the abduction until morning? Odds are that most parents would have discovered their child missing sooner.

152 posted on 02/28/2002 7:45:06 AM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
The same thought crossed my mind! That's why I think that dear old dad isn't so innocent...
153 posted on 02/28/2002 7:45:42 AM PST by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
No, your theory that Westerfield could claim he abducted the child to save her from the swinging lifestyle and accidentally killed her trying to calm her down, doesn't wash.

He wouldn't EVEN try to go down that road. The poor child was found naked, and most likely, sexually molested. His DNA, if he did it would be all over the place.

I don't think he set out that particular evening to abduct, molest and kill the child....no excuses....just that he obviously took advantage of an opportunity which presented itself...because he KNEW he could get away with it. WHY?

sw

154 posted on 02/28/2002 7:46:39 AM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
SAN DIEGO -- Authorities expect to determine conclusively today that the body of a young girl found dumped off a road near El Cajon is that of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam.Danielle van Dam

The medical examiner removed the body around 11:30 p.m. Wednesday. San Diego County medical examiner's office investigator Chuck Bolton said that dental records will likely be used to make a positive identification.


155 posted on 02/28/2002 7:49:40 AM PST by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
And if you think you read it, then you probably did.

I've read so many articles about this, I may be confused. But I do believe I did read something about her earrings, very early on.....there must have been a reason why.

156 posted on 02/28/2002 7:50:17 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: mackattack
I have never seen a sad or remorseful look on the father's face. No emotion, just some dumb look off into space. I have a hard time believing that he had no involvement in this.

Maybe you would feel better about him if he could pull the "Clinton-wipe a tear" trick? Did it ever occur to you that he may be both sedated and still in a state of shock,and THAT is responsible for the "look" you don't like?

157 posted on 02/28/2002 7:51:00 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

Comment #158 Removed by Moderator

To: sneakypete
Culpable...

sw

159 posted on 02/28/2002 7:54:51 AM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
I remember all the bandwidth used up by Freepers thinking Daniel Pearl's wife wasn't acting "normally" too.

These are just a bunch of "Mrs.Grundy/ChurchLady" types who want to condemn somebody who is different from them so they can think they look superior to somebody.

160 posted on 02/28/2002 7:55:53 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson