Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Is No Good Trade
WorldnetDaily ^ | February 18, 2000 | By Tom Flocco

Posted on 01/19/2002 10:44:54 PM PST by Uncle Bill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-337 next last
To: Uncle Bill
Wow, Uncle Bill ... good stuff. Thanks for all your diligence in researching and uncovering for our consideration all relevant facts.
261 posted on 07/17/2002 10:14:39 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill; nunya bidness
I thought I saw him on TV just yesterday or the day before giving a speech about corporate governance

Figures.

Was Gorby there too?

State of the World Forum has launched a new, for-profit enterprise, State of the World, Inc., to bring a new implementation and knowledge sharing capacity to the Forum's existing capacity for convening leading thinkers from around the world. The Company's business strategy is to build a pre-eminent global enterprise that serves as a "one-stop shop" and primary provider of sustainable solutions for business, government and NGO decision-makers. To achieve this leadership position, State of the World, Inc. is assembling a world class, senior management team and a consortium of strategic alliances worldwide that can work together to establish a standard of excellence and professionalism previously unavailable in this critical marketspace.


BUSINESS ETHICS, LEADERSHIP AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN ACTION

Topics to be discussed include: What are the main contributions of business ethics, leadership and corporate governance to sustainable, just and prosperous organizations to maximize public good? What role do the legal and regulatory frameworks play in different countries? How are the social, environmental and human dimensions rising to the domain of corporate boardrooms? Can exceptional leaders move far beyond compliance? This will be a session by champions and pioneers, with a great feminine soul.
["Breakout" seminar, 9/6/00]

GLOBAL STABILITY THROUGH ENTERPRISE
This panel will discuss the role of economic actos in engaging local communites in productive activities which build social and civic capital and presaent rich case studies of successes and failures. We will hear from wolrd leaders in local politics, global business, international organizations and civil society about their experiences, the obstacles they face and the key factors which determine the sutainability of enterprise-based solutions to conflict-based zones. We can also arrange to create synergies among the initiatives of each contributor and lead to new projects.
["Breakout" seminar, 9/6/00]


UNITED NATIONS COMPACT FOR RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT
At a time when everything is being reinvented, how can the United Nations forge long-lasting partnerships with the business community? What are the pitfalls and how to avoid them? This panel will take a look at the power of responsible enterprise and how it can propel the progressive business leaders to the forefront of a truly giant compact -- a global Marshall Plan -- with the UN agencies, for the eradication of poverty [read: eradication of the poor], the development [read: redesign] of all, and the rebuilding of national capital.
["Breakout" seminar 9/6/00]


Some scrapbook materials from the "Soviet Analyst's" attendance at the 2000 World State, er, "State of the World" forum.

262 posted on 07/17/2002 11:09:07 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
NOTES ON A NATIVE SON
The indispensable local money came from Richard Rainwater, formerly the chief financial adviser to the Bass brothers of Fort Worth. Little known to the general public, Rainwater was famous on Wall Street for growing the Bass inheritance from around $50 million in 1970 to more than $4 billion by the time he left in 1986 to manage his own investments."
263 posted on 07/17/2002 1:00:08 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
The Edgar info on Harken only goes back to '93, but there are some figures in this report on production and revenue back into the late '80's. Offhand, that was one sorry company as far as I can tell. There's some info in that also about Bass and his involvement.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/313478/0000950134-94-000289.txt

264 posted on 07/17/2002 4:36:07 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
Excellent, thanks.

Just Keep Snooping Regarding Harken To Prove There's There There

Amid scandals, Bush White House takes a risky path, placing loyalty over public duty


President Bush, President Kwasniewski Hold Joint Press Conference

Remarks by President Bush and President Kwasniewski of Poland in Press Conference

The East Room

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
July 17, 2002
Source

12:03 P.M. EDT

Partial transcript:

PRESIDENT BUSH: We'll answer some questions. We'll alternate between the American press and the Polish press, three apiece --

Q Mr. President, even while you're calling for transparency in corporate America, you refuse to ask the SEC to turn over documents from its investigation into Harken Energy Corporation, your old company. And the Vice President has answered few questions about his role at Halliburton, his old company, which is now under investigation by the SEC. Why not just clear the air, ask the SEC to release those documents and ask the Vice President to talk about Halliburton in a public forum?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, first, the Vice President -- I've got great confidence in the Vice President, doing a heck of a good job. When I picked him, I knew he was a fine business leader and a fine experienced man. And he's doing a great job. That matter will take -- run its course, the Halliburton investigation, and the facts will come out at some point in time.

Secondly, as to a look at Harken, the SEC, as a result of Freedom of Information requests, has released documents, and the key document said there is no case. It was fully investigated by career investigators. Some of you, I think, have talked to the head career investigator, and he's made it clear there was no case.
[End of partial transcript]

"It must in no way be construed as indicating that the party[George W. Bush] has been exonerated or that no action may ultimately result from the staff's investigation." Bruce A. Hiler - associate director of the SEC's enforcement division."

James Doty is a senior partner at Baker Boggs. In the late 1980s, he was George W. Bush's personal lawyer, who helped arrange Bush's purchase of part-ownership of the Texas Rangers.

Doty was then named Securities and Exchange Commission General Counsel.

NPR's Bob Edwards just interview James Doty about all of this -- and Doty has stayed true to White House form, squirming and dissembling about Bush, especially when confronted with hard facts.

Doty told Edwards that, in the Harken deal, Bush "met not only the letter but the spirit of the law," and that he was and is "a compliant person."

Really, Mr. Doty? Then why, in a memo dated July 17, 1991, did SEC investigators complain that Bush and his lawyers were being evasive, hiding behind attorney-client privilege, and withholding crucial information?

When Doty tried to say that the SEC had, in fact, exonerated Bush, Edwards pressed him, asking if the letter has not in fact explicitly stated that Bush had not been exonerated.

Doty: "No, it [the SEC letter] simply says the agency reserved the right to reopen the file..."

Edwards: "Let me find it. Let me find it." Then he quoted directly from the SEC letter, about how Bush had not been exonerated. This caught the smooth velvet Doty off-guard somewhat.

Doty: "I think the release prohibits..the docu..th..the letter prohibits people representing it...as exoneration."

You can listen to the interview here.

NPR - Host Bob Edwards talks with James Doty


Bushbots for BakerBotts.

Note of interest
on Baker Botts L.L.P.:


265 posted on 07/17/2002 8:21:11 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I can appreciate the amount of work you have put into this Bill. Your zeal is admirable. Giving you the benefit of the doubt, lets say that maybe half of these accusations and assumptions are true. It doesn't matter. Reasonable people understand that the powerful and influential people of this country do not play by the same rules as you and I do. Bush may be guilty of bad judgement and greed, but who isn't at some point in there lives? Can you say you've never used bad judgement or shown a little greed from time to time Uncle Bill??

No, what matters is what the man does while he is IN office. The hard facts are that most people who read this will not give it too much of a second thought. While some of it may be wrapped in truth, it's mudslinging, and atleast 73% of we fine citizens will see it as just that. Sorry Bill. 73% doesn't lie. You'd better get used to it, or you'll be copying and pasting for years to come.

266 posted on 07/17/2002 9:10:35 PM PDT by American Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
48 percent of those surveyed said that they believed Mr. Bush was hiding something

Asked whether Mr. Bush was telling the truth about his dealings at Harken Energy, an oil company where he was a director and consultant from 1986 to 1993, 48 percent of those surveyed said that they believed Mr. Bush was hiding something; another 9 percent said they thought he was mostly lying.
Source.

"I came here to ask for one thing: I hope you never lie to me."
George W. Bush - Source

VOTE BUSH FOR MORE OF THE SAME:

Bush lies about Harken.

Bush lies about CFR.

Bush lies about federally funding stem cell research from aborted fetuses.

VOTE BUSH FOR MORE BIG GOVERNMENT SOCIALIST SPENDING

Why Democrats Should Draft George W.(FDR) Bush In 2004

Don't listen to what he says: Bush promises to cut farm bill
Watch what he does: Bush Signs Largest Farm Bill In Hisory - An 80% Increase - Cost Average Taxpayer $4300 In Higher Taxes - The largest 10% Of Farms Get 75% Of The Farm Subsidies

AND THESE ARE REPUBLICANS - "Despite the fact that the Republicans control the White House, the House of Representatives, and 30 governorships, the nation is now in the midst of the biggest government spending spree since LBJ. Incredibly, the domestic social welfare budget has expanded more in just two years ($96 billion) under George W. Bush than in Bill Clinton's first six years in office ($51 billion)."

267 posted on 07/17/2002 9:37:14 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84; OKCSubmariner; Askel5; Donald Stone; nunya bidness
BUSH SHED LITTLE LIGHT IN 1991 SEC PROBE

Under scrutiny

Bloomberg News
July 18, 2002
Source

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigators, heading an insider trading probe in 1991, said they had difficulty getting useful information from Mr George W. Bush on what he knew about the finances of Harken Energy Corp, where he was a director.

'Bush has produced a small amount of additional documents which provide little insight as to what Harken non-public information he knew and when he knew it,' the SEC investigators said three months into their inquiry, according to a memo dated July 17, 1991.

Mr Bush was then managing general partner of the Texas Rangers baseball team.

The memo was released on Thursday by the Centre for Public Integrity, a group that monitors government ethics.


Harken Energy Had A Web Of Mideast Connections: BCCI

New ambassador to Saudi Arabia is another Bush/Carlyle Group crony

Bush Calls for End to Loans of a Type He Once Received

Byron York: Bush, Release The Documents

Daschle Calls For Bush SEC Records On Harken Energy

SEC Chief Says He Opposes Release of Files on Bush

BUSH REJECTS CALLS TO DUMP PITT

Bush Signed Stock 'Lockup' Letter

Amid scandals, Bush White House takes a risky path, placing loyalty over public duty

Bush Defends His Texas Oil Dealings: 'Sometimes Things Aren't Exactly Black and White'

Who bought Bush's stock in problem-plagued oil company and why?

1990 deal mystery: Who bought Bush's shares in Harken?

Papers offer info on Bush knowledge

Everyone is Outraged

The Insider Game

Reporters Pound Bush Over Harken Sale

LIVE THREAD: PRESIDENT BUSH'S PRESS CONFERENCE - 5 P.M.

Bush - White House Press Transcript - Bush Falls Apart

Bush Harken Deal Faces New Scrutiny

Wall Street scandals take toll on Bush - GOP trembles as election nears

We ve learned President Bush is a hypocrite, so what

After a terrible blunder, Bush finally got it right with shady businesses

George Bush, Failed Corporate Crook: Nitwit Scion Turns Avenger

Page A-1 Boston Globe - "President defends '90 stock sale"

The President's Business

CROOKS IN THE WHITE HOUSE

Bush, a fan of corporate corruption

Next 'Vast Conspiracy'Is Headed Bush's Way

Insider deals catch up with George W. Bush

The Democrats' Harken Lie

Reports gleefully transform Bush oil deal into 'scandal'

George W's 'scandal'

The Facts About Bush and Harken
The Facts About Bush and Harken

Ford: Probe Bush Harken Deal, Not Hillary Cattle Scam

Senator Lieberman - "Because of the president's involvement in the Harken Energy case, there is a large cloud hanging over his head. I am afraid if he doesn't eliminate it soon by giving full disclosure, [the suspicions] will diminish his moral authority — his presidential authority to lead the critical effort to restore confidence in the [stock] market."

Sen. Hatch Joins Dems in Call for Harken Documents

Bush Was 'Irresponsible Corporatist'

Media Coverage of Harken 50 Times Greater Than Whitewater

Broker Insists Bush Made Sure Sale OK

Why Investigation of Bush's Stock Sale

Bush confident of vindication - "there is no case." - "It was fully investigated," (Wink, wink)

George W. Bush's Swat Team Leader:

Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson - Bush's top corporate-crime fighter paid $400 million to settle "fraud charges"

Bush corporate SWAT head headed Providian

Bush 'SWAT team' eyes corporate fraud

'SWAT team' targets fiscal fraud

How Providian misled card holders


STEPS TO WEALTH

The Bush Clan's Family Business


SEC Edgar Site



268 posted on 07/18/2002 2:26:59 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84; OKCSubmariner
There are some good source quotes here:

George W. Bush - Harken Source Quotes

George W. Bush - Harken


The Color of Money

US News and World Report
by Stephen J. Hedges
March 16, 1992

The president’s eldest son and his ties to a troubled Texas firm

George W. Bush shares more than a name with his father. The president’s eldest son has followed closely in his father’s footsteps, trading Yale for Texas, working his way up from the dust and dry oil wells of West Texas to carve out his own piece of the Lone Start dream. Today he runs the Texas Rangers baseball team, sits on the boards of several companies and is rising start in the state’s Republican Party. As George Bush the president glides to victory in the Texas primary this week, George Bush the son will be a center stage with his father. Some say he the president’s most influential advisors. It was George W. Bush, after all, who was called upon to tell John Sununu that powerful Republicans wanted him to resign as the White House chief of staff. Sununu was gone soon afterward.

In one important respect, however, George W. Bush has less in common with his father than with his younger brother Neil, who sat on the board of Denver’s now infamous Silverado Savings & Loan. When the thrift failed in 1988, with $1 billion in losses, Neil Bush said he didn’t understand Silverado’s complex deals. George W. Bush has also benefited from some questionable but less well-known business associations. A U.S. News examination of one of his principal investments, in the Dallas-based Harken Energy Corp., found that:


269 posted on 07/18/2002 3:07:44 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84; OKCSubmariner
HARKEN - From Oil to Baseball to the Governor's Mansion
"Ms. Hughes, the Bush spokeswoman, 'he did not know about the losses that would later be posted.' Mr. Bush was not selling ahead of bad news, Ms. Hughes said."
270 posted on 07/18/2002 3:26:34 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84; OKCSubmariner
"Responsible leaders do not take home tens of millions of dollars in compensation as their companies prepared to file for bankruptcy, devastating the holdings of their investors."
George W. Bush - speech on "corporate accountability" July 9, 2002.

golly no, wouldn't think of it

271 posted on 07/18/2002 3:53:23 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Minor detail about the president of Harken from another article.

Bush and other members of Harken Energy's audit board (including Harken's president, former Arthur Andersen accountant Mikel Faulkner)

272 posted on 07/18/2002 4:36:53 AM PDT by Donald Stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Gee, what happened to "Move along, nothing to see here." The President suddenly rediscovers morality...and 'Responsibility.' Meanwhile Bubba and Hitlery pile up the millions using their illegal copies of the FBI files...without any fears of GWB whatsoever. And GWB will find that his rhetoric is going to bite him in the rear.
273 posted on 07/18/2002 8:15:51 AM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84; OKCSubmariner; Askel5
Mystery of Harvard's "rescue" of Harken Energy

The following articles would be of interest:

"Ivy League Investors Take a Big Stake in Harken Stock," Dallas Business Journal, Scott Williams, March 1, 1991, p. 5.

"Harvard Sees $200m Writedown," The Boston Globe, Kimberly Blanton, October 8, 1991, p. 35.

"George Bush is Breeden’s Mao." Stephen Labaton, "Wall Street’s Ambitious Top Cop," The New York Times Business World Magazine, March 24, 1991, p. 12.

Well connected: Family ties helped fund oil venture that began Bush's business career

Bush's Big Score
"Bush has insisted that he "wasn't aware of the details" of the land condemnations. But on October 27, 1990, Bush was quoted in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram about the development plans for the acreage around the stadium. "The idea of making a land play, absolutely, to plunk the field down in the middle of a big piece of land, that's kind of always been the strategy," Bush said. In other words, while Bush didn't know the details regarding the condemnation of the Matheses' property, he did plan to exploit their property for his personal benefit."


The life of George W. Bush - "I wasn't aware of..."

274 posted on 07/18/2002 5:04:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
"The life of George W. Bush - "I wasn't aware of..."

No wonder he was tagged with the reputation of being a numb..... ah.... not real aware.

Something that seems to jump out in the compiled stories is the dates of the stories. All prior to his Governor runs, none around the time of his pres run. Even the WSJ and the American Spec. were digging it out back then, but then were mostly silent for the next Dynasty Placement. Seems like some Powerful Messages were sent for his National run, doesn't it? "Lay OFF", being the idea.

It's just an impression to me.

275 posted on 07/18/2002 7:05:20 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
From "Well Connected" ---

"There are many pockets in a politician's coat, and sometimes the more subtle pockets are the ones people prefer," said Larry Makinson, executive director at the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group in Washington. "What you've really got to be careful about is that someday, if he becomes president, these people don't cash in their chips and reap a windfall at the expense of the American public."

Mr. Makinson cited first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton's windfall in cattle futures before her husband's election as president."

276 posted on 07/18/2002 7:32:44 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84; Askel5; Donald Stone; OKCSubmariner
WHAT DID HE DO?

The Economist
print edition
Jul 20th 2002| WASHINGTON, DC
Source

The whiff of cronyism surrounds the president's past business deals

THE Dow Jones Industrial Average is not the only thing looking like a punctured balloon. The air may be hissing out of George Bush's poll ratings, too.

Zogby International, a polling firm, says that only 62% of those it asked now think his performance “positive”, the lowest figure since September 11th. To be fair, another poll, for the Washington Post, shows his approval rating almost unchanged at 72%. But the omens are not good. Thomas Riehle, the president of another polling outfit, Ipsos-Reid, points out that the number of Americans saying things are on the wrong track outnumber, for the first time this year, those who think things are going the right way. Fewer than half say they would re-elect Mr Bush if a presidential election were held today.

The revelations about the president's involvement in unsavoury business practices a decade ago have aggravated this vulnerability. The most commonly mentioned name is Harken Energy, a Texan firm where Mr Bush was a director.

In 1990, Mr Bush failed to obey the letter of the law in not reporting on time the sale of Harken shares. His excuse is that the lawyers ate his paperwork. In 1989 Harken partly obscured its real financial position by selling a subsidiary at a healthy profit to a group of Harken executives who borrowed some of the money for the purchase from the company. The Securities and Exchange Commission required Harken to restate its earnings. Mr Bush also bought some Harken shares using “sweetheart” loans from the company itself, a practice he now says should be stopped. Lastly, it turns out that ten weeks before the 1990 sale of those shares he signed a “lock-up letter”, promising not to sell for six months after a proposed public offering. His spokesman says the promise did not stand when the public offering failed to go through.

None of this seems to be a WorldCom-class example of bilking the shareholders. There are two more worrying things for the White House. The first is an SEC investigation into what went on in the 1990s at Halliburton, an oil-services company, when Vice-President Dick Cheney was its boss. The firm used an accounting change to count as earnings a portion of income on some projects in dispute. Mr Bush has already been pushed into insisting that Mr Cheney will be exonerated. Whatever happens, Mr Cheney must regret his comments about his firm's accountants (wait for it), Andersen: “One of the things I like that they do for us is that...I get good advice...over and above the normal by-the-books audit arrangement.” Whoops.

The second problem for the White House is that Mr Bush seems to have benefited from what Americans excoriated during the Asian financial crisis as “crony capitalism”. Mr Bush's fortune came not from Harken but from his share in the sale of the Texas Rangers, a baseball team in which he invested using Harken shares as collateral. Three questions arise.

First, Mr Bush's stake in the team was 1.8%, which should have given him $4.5m from its sale. In fact he got $14.9m, because his partners gave up some of their share. As Paul Krugman, a columnist on the New York Times, points out, Mr Bush was then governor of Texas. Was this unethical?

Second, the price of the Texas Rangers soared partly because it got a new stadium built largely at taxpayers' expense. This was approved by local voters, but lawsuits allege that some of the land purchases involved were illegal. Is that true?

Third, the Rangers' buyer was Tom Hicks. As part of his “privatisation” of the management of the University of Texas's huge endowment, Mr Bush changed the rules so that the fund merely needed to report its overall performance, not the details of each deal. Mr Hicks was the head of the investment firm that managed UT's money. Was there any link between this and the purchase of the Rangers?

Without more evidence, one has to assume the answer to all these questions is no. Moreover, many other politicians, Democrats as well as Republicans, have equally questionable episodes in their pasts, and worse things have doubtless gone on in Texas. Still, Mr Bush is a special case. He came into office promising to “change the tone” of Washington. His business travails are undermining his promise, and may yet cause Americans to see him as “just another politician”.


Vote: Just another politician

277 posted on 07/18/2002 9:33:39 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
"It's just an impression to me."

Gotta have a king.

SEC Chief Says He Opposes Release of Files on Bush

278 posted on 07/18/2002 11:58:37 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Bush Signed Stock 'Lockup' Letter
279 posted on 07/19/2002 12:18:09 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
You lying sack of pus. The SEC investigated all of this and filed no charges. Stuff it you moron commie/lib.
280 posted on 07/19/2002 12:22:52 AM PDT by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson