Posted on 01/19/2002 10:44:54 PM PST by Uncle Bill
Figures.
Was Gorby there too?
State of the World Forum has launched a new, for-profit enterprise, State of the World, Inc., to bring a new implementation and knowledge sharing capacity to the Forum's existing capacity for convening leading thinkers from around the world. The Company's business strategy is to build a pre-eminent global enterprise that serves as a "one-stop shop" and primary provider of sustainable solutions for business, government and NGO decision-makers. To achieve this leadership position, State of the World, Inc. is assembling a world class, senior management team and a consortium of strategic alliances worldwide that can work together to establish a standard of excellence and professionalism previously unavailable in this critical marketspace.
BUSINESS ETHICS, LEADERSHIP AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN ACTION
Topics to be discussed include: What are the main contributions of business ethics, leadership and corporate governance to sustainable, just and prosperous organizations to maximize public good? What role do the legal and regulatory frameworks play in different countries? How are the social, environmental and human dimensions rising to the domain of corporate boardrooms? Can exceptional leaders move far beyond compliance? This will be a session by champions and pioneers, with a great feminine soul.
["Breakout" seminar, 9/6/00]
GLOBAL STABILITY THROUGH ENTERPRISE
This panel will discuss the role of economic actos in engaging local communites in productive activities which build social and civic capital and presaent rich case studies of successes and failures. We will hear from wolrd leaders in local politics, global business, international organizations and civil society about their experiences, the obstacles they face and the key factors which determine the sutainability of enterprise-based solutions to conflict-based zones. We can also arrange to create synergies among the initiatives of each contributor and lead to new projects.
["Breakout" seminar, 9/6/00]
UNITED NATIONS COMPACT FOR RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT
At a time when everything is being reinvented, how can the United Nations forge long-lasting partnerships with the business community? What are the pitfalls and how to avoid them? This panel will take a look at the power of responsible enterprise and how it can propel the progressive business leaders to the forefront of a truly giant compact -- a global Marshall Plan -- with the UN agencies, for the eradication of poverty [read: eradication of the poor], the development [read: redesign] of all, and the rebuilding of national capital.
["Breakout" seminar 9/6/00]
Some scrapbook materials from the "Soviet Analyst's" attendance at the 2000 World State, er, "State of the World" forum.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/313478/0000950134-94-000289.txt
Just Keep Snooping Regarding Harken To Prove There's There There
Amid scandals, Bush White House takes a risky path, placing loyalty over public duty
President Bush, President Kwasniewski Hold Joint Press Conference
Remarks by President Bush and President Kwasniewski of Poland in Press Conference
The East Room
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
July 17, 2002
Source
12:03 P.M. EDT
Partial transcript:
PRESIDENT BUSH: We'll answer some questions. We'll alternate between the American press and the Polish press, three apiece --
Q Mr. President, even while you're calling for transparency in corporate America, you refuse to ask the SEC to turn over documents from its investigation into Harken Energy Corporation, your old company. And the Vice President has answered few questions about his role at Halliburton, his old company, which is now under investigation by the SEC. Why not just clear the air, ask the SEC to release those documents and ask the Vice President to talk about Halliburton in a public forum?
PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, first, the Vice President -- I've got great confidence in the Vice President, doing a heck of a good job. When I picked him, I knew he was a fine business leader and a fine experienced man. And he's doing a great job. That matter will take -- run its course, the Halliburton investigation, and the facts will come out at some point in time.
Secondly, as to a look at Harken, the SEC, as a result of Freedom of Information requests, has released documents, and the key document said there is no case. It was fully investigated by career investigators. Some of you, I think, have talked to the head career investigator, and he's made it clear there was no case.
[End of partial transcript]
"It must in no way be construed as indicating that the party[George W. Bush] has been exonerated or that no action may ultimately result from the staff's investigation." Bruce A. Hiler - associate director of the SEC's enforcement division."
James Doty is a senior partner at Baker Boggs. In the late 1980s, he was George W. Bush's personal lawyer, who helped arrange Bush's purchase of part-ownership of the Texas Rangers.
Doty was then named Securities and Exchange Commission General Counsel.
NPR's Bob Edwards just interview James Doty about all of this -- and Doty has stayed true to White House form, squirming and dissembling about Bush, especially when confronted with hard facts.
Doty told Edwards that, in the Harken deal, Bush "met not only the letter but the spirit of the law," and that he was and is "a compliant person."
Really, Mr. Doty? Then why, in a memo dated July 17, 1991, did SEC investigators complain that Bush and his lawyers were being evasive, hiding behind attorney-client privilege, and withholding crucial information?
When Doty tried to say that the SEC had, in fact, exonerated Bush, Edwards pressed him, asking if the letter has not in fact explicitly stated that Bush had not been exonerated.
Doty: "No, it [the SEC letter] simply says the agency reserved the right to reopen the file..."
Edwards: "Let me find it. Let me find it." Then he quoted directly from the SEC letter, about how Bush had not been exonerated. This caught the smooth velvet Doty off-guard somewhat.
Doty: "I think the release prohibits..the docu..th..the letter prohibits people representing it...as exoneration."
You can listen to the interview here.
NPR - Host Bob Edwards talks with James Doty
Bushbots for BakerBotts.
Note of interest
on Baker Botts L.L.P.:
Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm
"James A. Baker III is the current Baker in Baker Botts. Baker was Secretary of State under the first President Bush. He is currently senior counsel to The Carlyle Group."
The Bass Boys:
"In 1989, Congress finally came up with $157 billion to bail out the S&Ls. But by that time, the costs were over $200 billion (and they continue to rise to this day). To make up the difference, the Resolution Trust Corporation was formed; it sold off the assets of failed S&Ls, mostly at bargain-basement prices in sweetheart deals.
For example, Robert Bass, one of the richest men in America, bought American Savings and Loan for $350 million, then received $2 billion in government subsidies to help him resurrect it. (With that much money, you could probably raise the dead.) During one week in 1988, the government promised $8 billion in assistance to nine S&L purchasers; one of them put $20 million down, and the other eight paid nothing."
Take the Rich Off Welfare - by Mark Zepezauer and Arthur Naiman - Odonian Press, 1996.
"Which brings us to one of the interesting conundrums encountered in Bush finances. The contract with Bahrain would have been impossible to carry out by Harken alone; it needed big, big bucks. These were supplied by the Bass family of Fort Worth, a clan of billionaires. Was this a quid pro quo or just a happy coincidence? Of course, the Basses may have simply wanted to take a gamble, as they often did. On the other hand, they may have felt some obligation to help George W.s company as a kind of payback; after all, his fathers administration had given $2 billion in tax-exempt subsidies to a group of vultures (to use Newsweeks generic term) headed by Robert Bass, to help pick the carcass of the $16.3 billion American Savings and Loan, the biggest insolvent S&L in the country, but still very fleshy.
Robert Bass good fortune on that occasion may have had something to do with the fact that he was a member of Vice President Bushs Team 100, a knot of rich men, each of whom contributed $100,000 or more to Bushs 1988 presidential campaign. On the other hand, so much money, so many favors have been passed back and forth over the years between the Bushes and their incredibly wealthy backers, it is probably foolish to try to figure out all the quid pro quos that tie their daisy chain together."
SOURCE: The Bush Files
The Malefactors of Great Wealth
"When Bush was in the oil business, his failing company, Spectrum 7, was bought by Harken Energy. Bush and his two partners got $2 million in stock in exchange for a company that had lost $400,000 in the six months prior to the sale. Bush himself got stock worth about $500,000 and an annual consulting fee of $120,000, later reduced to $50,000.
In June 1990, Bush sold two-thirds of the Harken stock he had acquired in the Spectrum 7 deal at $4 a share-$318,430 more than it was worth when he got it. A month before Bush sold his stock, the Harken board appointed Bush and another company director, E. Stuart Watson, to a "fairness committee" to determine how restructuring would affect ordinary stockholders.
Smith, Barney, Harris, Upham & Co., the financial consultants hired by Harken, told Bush and Watson only drastic action could save the company. So Bush sold his stock before the news became public. According to U.S. News & World Report, there was "substantial evidence to suggest that Bush knew Harken was in dire straits." Insiders liquidating large blocks of stock are required to notify the Securities and Exchange Commission immediately. Bush reported the sale eight months after the federal deadline. Although the SEC does prosecute flagrant violators of insider-reporting rules, according to The Wall Street Journal, first-time violators usually get only a warning letter."
Beasts of the (Oil) Field
"Texas Wild! is Ramona Basss baby, and if oil looms large in her version of environmental history-and it does-perhaps thats because oil made Ramona Bass who she is today. The daughter of rancher, oilman and avid hunter Arthur A. Seeligson, Ramona is the wife of Lee Bass-one of the billionaire Bass brothers and chairman of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission. The Bass empire was founded by Lee Basss great uncle, Sid Richardson, a wildcatter who struck it rich in the oilfields of West Texas. Bass and his three brothers inherited almost $3 million each from him. Investments in Texaco and Disney made them billionaires."
No, what matters is what the man does while he is IN office. The hard facts are that most people who read this will not give it too much of a second thought. While some of it may be wrapped in truth, it's mudslinging, and atleast 73% of we fine citizens will see it as just that. Sorry Bill. 73% doesn't lie. You'd better get used to it, or you'll be copying and pasting for years to come.
Asked whether Mr. Bush was telling the truth about his dealings at Harken Energy, an oil company where he was a director and consultant from 1986 to 1993, 48 percent of those surveyed said that they believed Mr. Bush was hiding something; another 9 percent said they thought he was mostly lying.
Source.
"I came here to ask for one thing: I hope you never lie to me."
George W. Bush - Source
VOTE BUSH FOR MORE OF THE SAME:
Bush lies about Harken.
Bush lies about CFR.
Bush lies about federally funding stem cell research from aborted fetuses.
VOTE BUSH FOR MORE BIG GOVERNMENT SOCIALIST SPENDING
Why Democrats Should Draft George W.(FDR) Bush In 2004
Don't listen to what he says: Bush promises to cut farm bill
Watch what he does: Bush Signs Largest Farm Bill In Hisory - An 80% Increase - Cost Average Taxpayer $4300 In Higher Taxes - The largest 10% Of Farms Get 75% Of The Farm Subsidies
Under scrutiny
Bloomberg News
July 18, 2002
Source
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigators, heading an insider trading probe in 1991, said they had difficulty getting useful information from Mr George W. Bush on what he knew about the finances of Harken Energy Corp, where he was a director.
'Bush has produced a small amount of additional documents which provide little insight as to what Harken non-public information he knew and when he knew it,' the SEC investigators said three months into their inquiry, according to a memo dated July 17, 1991.
Mr Bush was then managing general partner of the Texas Rangers baseball team.
The memo was released on Thursday by the Centre for Public Integrity, a group that monitors government ethics.
Harken Energy Had A Web Of Mideast Connections: BCCI
New ambassador to Saudi Arabia is another Bush/Carlyle Group crony
Bush Calls for End to Loans of a Type He Once Received
Byron York: Bush, Release The Documents
Daschle Calls For Bush SEC Records On Harken Energy
SEC Chief Says He Opposes Release of Files on Bush
BUSH REJECTS CALLS TO DUMP PITT
Bush Signed Stock 'Lockup' Letter
Amid scandals, Bush White House takes a risky path, placing loyalty over public duty
Bush Defends His Texas Oil Dealings: 'Sometimes Things Aren't Exactly Black and White'
Who bought Bush's stock in problem-plagued oil company and why?
1990 deal mystery: Who bought Bush's shares in Harken?
Papers offer info on Bush knowledge
Reporters Pound Bush Over Harken Sale
LIVE THREAD: PRESIDENT BUSH'S PRESS CONFERENCE - 5 P.M.
Bush - White House Press Transcript - Bush Falls Apart
Bush Harken Deal Faces New Scrutiny
Wall Street scandals take toll on Bush - GOP trembles as election nears
We ve learned President Bush is a hypocrite, so what
After a terrible blunder, Bush finally got it right with shady businesses
George Bush, Failed Corporate Crook: Nitwit Scion Turns Avenger
Page A-1 Boston Globe - "President defends '90 stock sale"
Bush, a fan of corporate corruption
Next 'Vast Conspiracy'Is Headed Bush's Way
Insider deals catch up with George W. Bush
Reports gleefully transform Bush oil deal into 'scandal'
The Facts About Bush and Harken
The Facts About Bush and Harken
Ford: Probe Bush Harken Deal, Not Hillary Cattle Scam
Sen. Hatch Joins Dems in Call for Harken Documents
Bush Was 'Irresponsible Corporatist'
Media Coverage of Harken 50 Times Greater Than Whitewater
Broker Insists Bush Made Sure Sale OK
Why Investigation of Bush's Stock Sale
Bush confident of vindication - "there is no case." - "It was fully investigated," (Wink, wink)
George W. Bush's Swat Team Leader:
Bush corporate SWAT head headed Providian
Bush 'SWAT team' eyes corporate fraud
'SWAT team' targets fiscal fraud
How Providian misled card holders
The Bush Clan's Family Business
George W. Bush - Harken Source Quotes
The Color of Money
US News and World Report
by Stephen J. Hedges
March 16, 1992
The presidents eldest son and his ties to a troubled Texas firm
George W. Bush shares more than a name with his father. The presidents eldest son has followed closely in his fathers footsteps, trading Yale for Texas, working his way up from the dust and dry oil wells of West Texas to carve out his own piece of the Lone Start dream. Today he runs the Texas Rangers baseball team, sits on the boards of several companies and is rising start in the states Republican Party. As George Bush the president glides to victory in the Texas primary this week, George Bush the son will be a center stage with his father. Some say he the presidents most influential advisors. It was George W. Bush, after all, who was called upon to tell John Sununu that powerful Republicans wanted him to resign as the White House chief of staff. Sununu was gone soon afterward.
In one important respect, however, George W. Bush has less in common with his father than with his younger brother Neil, who sat on the board of Denvers now infamous Silverado Savings & Loan. When the thrift failed in 1988, with $1 billion in losses, Neil Bush said he didnt understand Silverados complex deals. George W. Bush has also benefited from some questionable but less well-known business associations. A U.S. News examination of one of his principal investments, in the Dallas-based Harken Energy Corp., found that:
Despite repeated requests for interviews, Bush declined to discuss Harken or the reason for his stock sale, saying through an assistant that he "does not wish to read about himself." Harken executives say the companys practices are proper.
Harken Energy today is a very different company from the gutsy start-up outfits that President Bush and his father once ran. In 1983, Harken was purchased by a group of investors led by Alan Quasha, an aggressive young lawyer from New York. Quasha and his colleagues transformed Harken overnight, playing the oil game like high-stakes poker. They spent money, they made money - and most recently, they have lost money. The companys annual reports now speak little of oil and gas production but volumes about share offerings and renegotiated debt.
George W. Bush arrived in the Texas oil fields in the mid-1970s. Within a few years, he had founded his own exploration company. His partner, Mike Conaway, says they "made some money and lost some money." But by 1983, the oil market was in trouble, and so was Bush Exploration. Relief came from two Cincinati investors who had their own small oil frim, Spectrum 7. William DeWitt was the son of the former owners of the Cincinnati Reds baseball team. Mercer Reynolds was his business partner. A DeWitt family relative and old oil hand, Paul Rea, ran Spectrum 7. Rea met Bush when he first arrived in Texas. The two became friends.
Enter Quahsa. The son of an affluent American lawyer in the Phillipines, Alan Quasha brought Harken some impressive financial backers. They included money manager George Soros, who would come to hold a 30.4 percent stake; Harvard Management Co., who would control another 30.4 percent share, and Abduliah Taha Bakhsh, a Saudi investor with 21.4 percent. Harken bought Spectrum out in 1986, trading stock for Spectrum assets. Bush received $600,000 in Harken shares, but his stake would actually be worth much more.
Harken is a small oil company, but it pays big league benefits. Estimates based on company documents show that Quasha and Harken President Mikel Faulkner each received compensation worth more than $400,000 a year between 1986 and 1990, including stock options. In addition, Faulkner has borrowed $1.1 million from Harken, using stock as collateral. Quasha has borrowed $631,270 from the company, and Harken has paid his law firm $1.3 million in fees since 1988. At least three other Harken executives had six-figure compensation when Harken posted its $40 million loss. Faulkner says the compensation is based on "incentives and performance." He does not consider Harkens pay excessive.
In addition to his $600,000 stake in Harken, George W. Bush has profited handsomely. As a consultant to the company for "investor relations and equity placement," Bush was paid $80,000 a year until 1989, when his salary jumped to $120,000. With the company suffering, Bush received only $50,000 last year and $42,000 this year. He also receives $2,000 for each board committee meeting and in 1989 was granted, with other directors, options for 25,000 shares of Harken stock. Faulkner declines to say what services Bush has performed as a consultant.
Sweet Deals
As is the case with many executive compensation packages, the key to Harkens is the stock options. But very few companies offer terms as sweet. For starters, Harken offers select executives, including Bush, eight year loans at 5% interest. The loans may be used by the company brass to exercise options to purchase Harken shares. Bush has borrowed $180,375. At Harken, loans are sometimes forgiven. The board forgave $72,000 in non-interest-bearing loans to employees in 1989, and $269,000 in 1990.
The deal gets sweater still. Harken allows select executives and directors like Bush, who exercise their options, to purchase stock at a 40 percent discount; most U.S. companies allow executives to purchase their companies stock at current market value. Harken says it is because the stock is not registered and therefore cannot be traded. But in March 1990, Harken registered 1.8 million option shares. "Unusual," says Paula Todd of Towers Perrin, a compensation consulting firm, when asked about Harken compensation. "This definitely is not a cookie-cutter plan." Graef Crystal, a vocal critic of excessive executive pay, has harsher words: "This is a tremendous package for a little tiny company. Their stock has been growing at 4.9% per year when the market is growing at 15 percent. That is rotten performance."
Given Harkens troubles, it might appear that owning its stock isnt much of a bargain. However, Harkens liberal option program makes it profitable. On June 22, 1990, for instance, Bush sold $848,560 worth of stock, which was trading at $4 a share. Even with a $180,375 loan to pay back, Bush realized $668,185 on the sale. He still owns 105,012 Harken shares.
Harken has launched several deals involving its largest shareholders. The most complex was a major reorganization through the sale of two subsidiaries, E-Z Serve, a chain of gas stations, and Tejas Power, a natural-gas supplier.
First, companies tied to Alan Quasha and Harvard Management lent Harken $46 million. Harken used $15 million of that money to retire E-Z Serve debt. It spent $28 million more on capital improvements at E-Z Serve and Tejas stock. Harken kept the remaining $3 million. The company then gave its shareholders rights to buy E-Z Serve and Tejas stock. An agreement stipulated that any stock not purchased by the shareholders could be bought at a discount of at least 3 percent by two companies affiliated with Quasha and Harvard. But Quasha and Harvard controlled 55.6 percent of Harken stock. By not exercising the rights to buy it immediately, they effectively gave themselves the built-in discount. Harvard Management declines to discuss the deal.
There is substantial evidence to suggest that Bush knew Harken was in dire straits in the weeks before he sold the $848,560 of Harken stock. For one, Harkens board has appointed Bush and another director, E. Stuart Watson, as a "fairness committee" to determine whether the restructuring would adversely affect ordinary shareholders. The committee, which first met in May 1990, worked closely with financial advisors form Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., which had concluded by that time that only drastic action could save Harken. Even before then, however, Harkens SEC filings make it clear that the companys directors knew radical steps were necessary. One informed source says Harkens creditors had threatened to foreclose on the company if substantial debt payments were not made. Harkens treasurer, Dale Brooks strenuously denies any suggestion that creditors were poised to seize the company.
Today, Harken is letting it all ride on one all-or-nothing bet. Two years ago, it won the rights to look for oil and gas off the coast of Bahrain, a coup that shocked the industry. The first of the wells came up dry last month, giving analysts new reason to wonder if Harken itself isnt a dry hole.
For George W. Bush, however, Harken remains a good deal. He is still a director and consultant and has Harken shares worth about $400,000. A Bahrain gusher will mean all the more profit. If luck isnt with him, he has still done well with Harken.
It may be, though, that Harken has benefited most from Bushs board service. Thats the view of some Texas oil people and analysts, including founder Phil Kendrick, the oil man who founded Harken and sold out to Quasha a decade ago. "Its obvious why they kept George Bush." Kendrick says, "Just the fact that hes there gives them credibility. Hes worth $120,000 a year to them just for that."
golly no, wouldn't think of it
Bush and other members of Harken Energy's audit board (including Harken's president, former Arthur Andersen accountant Mikel Faulkner)
The following articles would be of interest:
"Ivy League Investors Take a Big Stake in Harken Stock," Dallas Business Journal, Scott Williams, March 1, 1991, p. 5.
"Harvard Sees $200m Writedown," The Boston Globe, Kimberly Blanton, October 8, 1991, p. 35.
"George Bush is Breedens Mao." Stephen Labaton, "Wall Streets Ambitious Top Cop," The New York Times Business World Magazine, March 24, 1991, p. 12.
Well connected: Family ties helped fund oil venture that began Bush's business career
Bush's Big Score
"Bush has insisted that he "wasn't aware of the details" of the land condemnations. But on October 27, 1990, Bush was quoted in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram about the development plans for the acreage around the stadium. "The idea of making a land play, absolutely, to plunk the field down in the middle of a big piece of land, that's kind of always been the strategy," Bush said. In other words, while Bush didn't know the details regarding the condemnation of the Matheses' property, he did plan to exploit their property for his personal benefit."
The life of George W. Bush - "I wasn't aware of..."
No wonder he was tagged with the reputation of being a numb..... ah.... not real aware.
Something that seems to jump out in the compiled stories is the dates of the stories. All prior to his Governor runs, none around the time of his pres run. Even the WSJ and the American Spec. were digging it out back then, but then were mostly silent for the next Dynasty Placement. Seems like some Powerful Messages were sent for his National run, doesn't it? "Lay OFF", being the idea.
It's just an impression to me.
"There are many pockets in a politician's coat, and sometimes the more subtle pockets are the ones people prefer," said Larry Makinson, executive director at the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group in Washington. "What you've really got to be careful about is that someday, if he becomes president, these people don't cash in their chips and reap a windfall at the expense of the American public."
Mr. Makinson cited first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton's windfall in cattle futures before her husband's election as president."
The Economist
print edition
Jul 20th 2002| WASHINGTON, DC
Source
The whiff of cronyism surrounds the president's past business deals
THE Dow Jones Industrial Average is not the only thing looking like a punctured balloon. The air may be hissing out of George Bush's poll ratings, too.
Zogby International, a polling firm, says that only 62% of those it asked now think his performance positive, the lowest figure since September 11th. To be fair, another poll, for the Washington Post, shows his approval rating almost unchanged at 72%. But the omens are not good. Thomas Riehle, the president of another polling outfit, Ipsos-Reid, points out that the number of Americans saying things are on the wrong track outnumber, for the first time this year, those who think things are going the right way. Fewer than half say they would re-elect Mr Bush if a presidential election were held today.
The revelations about the president's involvement in unsavoury business practices a decade ago have aggravated this vulnerability. The most commonly mentioned name is Harken Energy, a Texan firm where Mr Bush was a director.
In 1990, Mr Bush failed to obey the letter of the law in not reporting on time the sale of Harken shares. His excuse is that the lawyers ate his paperwork. In 1989 Harken partly obscured its real financial position by selling a subsidiary at a healthy profit to a group of Harken executives who borrowed some of the money for the purchase from the company. The Securities and Exchange Commission required Harken to restate its earnings. Mr Bush also bought some Harken shares using sweetheart loans from the company itself, a practice he now says should be stopped. Lastly, it turns out that ten weeks before the 1990 sale of those shares he signed a lock-up letter, promising not to sell for six months after a proposed public offering. His spokesman says the promise did not stand when the public offering failed to go through.
None of this seems to be a WorldCom-class example of bilking the shareholders. There are two more worrying things for the White House. The first is an SEC investigation into what went on in the 1990s at Halliburton, an oil-services company, when Vice-President Dick Cheney was its boss. The firm used an accounting change to count as earnings a portion of income on some projects in dispute. Mr Bush has already been pushed into insisting that Mr Cheney will be exonerated. Whatever happens, Mr Cheney must regret his comments about his firm's accountants (wait for it), Andersen: One of the things I like that they do for us is that...I get good advice...over and above the normal by-the-books audit arrangement. Whoops.
The second problem for the White House is that Mr Bush seems to have benefited from what Americans excoriated during the Asian financial crisis as crony capitalism. Mr Bush's fortune came not from Harken but from his share in the sale of the Texas Rangers, a baseball team in which he invested using Harken shares as collateral. Three questions arise.
First, Mr Bush's stake in the team was 1.8%, which should have given him $4.5m from its sale. In fact he got $14.9m, because his partners gave up some of their share. As Paul Krugman, a columnist on the New York Times, points out, Mr Bush was then governor of Texas. Was this unethical?
Second, the price of the Texas Rangers soared partly because it got a new stadium built largely at taxpayers' expense. This was approved by local voters, but lawsuits allege that some of the land purchases involved were illegal. Is that true?
Third, the Rangers' buyer was Tom Hicks. As part of his privatisation of the management of the University of Texas's huge endowment, Mr Bush changed the rules so that the fund merely needed to report its overall performance, not the details of each deal. Mr Hicks was the head of the investment firm that managed UT's money. Was there any link between this and the purchase of the Rangers?
Without more evidence, one has to assume the answer to all these questions is no. Moreover, many other politicians, Democrats as well as Republicans, have equally questionable episodes in their pasts, and worse things have doubtless gone on in Texas. Still, Mr Bush is a special case. He came into office promising to change the tone of Washington. His business travails are undermining his promise, and may yet cause Americans to see him as just another politician.
Vote: Just another politician
Gotta have a king.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.