Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enron Called Bush Cabinet Officers Before Bankruptcy
Reuters ^ | January 10, 2002 | By Arshad Mohammed

Posted on 01/10/2002 4:30:08 PM PST by MeekOneGOP

Thursday January 10 6:09 PM ET

Enron Called Bush Cabinet Officers Before Bankruptcy

Photos
Reuters Photo
Reuters Photo

Audio/Video
(ABCNEWS.com)
(AP)
Video - (Yahoo! Finance Vision)
Audio Technical Analysts: AMAT has limited upside near nerm - (ON24)
 

By Arshad Mohammed

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The collapse of Enron Corp. entangled the Bush administration on Thursday as the White House said two Cabinet officers were warned of its looming bankruptcy and Attorney General John Ashcroft (news - web sites) recused himself from the criminal investigation into the company.

Trying to inoculate himself from the political fallout, President Bush (news - web sites) ordered a review headed by Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill of U.S. pension and corporate disclosure rules to avoid a repeat of the energy trading firm's collapse, in which thousands of employees lost their pension savings.

In a series of stunning disclosures that followed Wednesday's announcement of a criminal probe into Enron, the energy firm's auditor, Andersen, said its employees had destroyed documents related to the former energy giant's balance sheet.

Bush's team has close ties to Enron and its chairman, Kenneth Lay, a major Bush campaign contributor who last autumn called O'Neill and Commerce Secretary Don Evans, Bush's 2000 campaign manager, to warn them of the impending bankruptcy.

The White House said O'Neill and Evans opted to do nothing about Lay's calls, which appeared to hint at the possibility of a private bailout like the one orchestrated by the New York Federal Reserve (news - web sites) in 1998 for hedge fund Long Term Capital Management.

A senior U.S. official, however, said that Lay ``did not ask for anything'' in the telephone calls.

The Justice Department (news - web sites) on Wednesday announced it had opened a criminal investigation into the energy trading company, whose December bankruptcy threw thousands out of work, devastated investors and wiped out the pension plans of many employees when its stock price plunged.

Ashcroft removed himself from the investigation, which is expected to focus on whether the firm misled investors about its accounts, because Enron gave him political contributions for his run for a U.S. Senate in his home state of Missouri.

DOCUMENTS DESTROYED

Anderson, the Big Five accounting firm that served as the company's auditor, on Thursday said its employees had deleted documents related to its review of the company's finances and congressional sources said thousands were destroyed.

Rep. Henry Waxman (news), a California Democrat who has already been seeking information about contacts between the White House and Enron, questioned whether the Bush administration could have done more to help the company and its employees.

``The White House had knowledge that Enron was likely to collapse but did nothing to try to protect innocent employees and shareholders who ultimately lost their life savings,'' he said in a statement. ``I am deeply troubled that the White House stood by and let this happen to thousands of families.''

Bush, who worked in the oil industry and has known Enron's chairman since he was governor of Texas, appeared to distance himself from Lay, saying he never discussed Enron's financial difficulties with him and last met the executive last spring.

``I have never discussed with Mr. Lay the financial problems of the company,'' Bush said, adding that the last time he had seen Lay was last spring at a literacy fund-raising event organized by his mother, former first lady Barbara Bush.

PHONE CALLS

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer (news - web sites) disclosed on Thursday that Lay telephoned O'Neill and Evans last autumn saying his company might not be able to meet its obligations.

Fleischer said Lay suggested the possibility of using the case of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM), a hedge fund which benefited from a private bailout orchestrated by the New York Federal Reserve in September 1998, as model for his company.

After studying the matter and concluding that Enron's problems would not have the kind of systemic effects on the economy that were feared in LTCM's case, O'Neill and Evans decided against taking any action.

``They both agreed no action should be taken to intervene,'' Fleischer said, adding that Bush was not informed of the decision but believes O'Neill and Evans acted ``wisely.''

At his daily briefing, the spokesman fended off questions about why Bush was not informed of the decision, the propriety and timing of Enron contacting top government officials about its problems, and whether Evans and O'Neill acted properly.

``Communication is not a wrong-doing. What took place here was they received phone calls and took no action,'' Fleischer said. ``The charge has been did the government take any action, and the answer from these two officials is no.''

Treasury spokeswoman Michele Davis said Lay called O'Neill on Oct. 28 and Nov. 8 -- after Enron's key Oct. 16 disclosure that it was taking huge charges related to its partnerships, which provided the first hint of its spectacular unraveling.

Speaking to reporters after meeting with economic advisers on Thursday, Bush placed the emphasis on workers and investors who suffered as a result of Enron's troubles and ordered two reviews to recommend how to better protect them in the future.

He said the first review, by the Treasury, Commerce and Labor departments, would analyze pension and 401(k) rules and recommend ways to reform them so that ``people are not exposed to losing their life savings as a result of a bankruptcy.''

The review of disclosure rules would be conducted by the Presidential Working Group on Financial Markets, which includes the Treasury Department (news - web sites), Securities and Exchange Commission (news - web sites), Federal Reserve and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Once the world's largest energy trader, Enron slid in mere weeks last year from Wall Street stardom to the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history on Dec. 2. Its downfall, after withdrawal of a rescue takeover bid by rival Dynegy Inc., threw thousands out of work and hammered investors.

The episode sapped the life savings of many Enron employees who held large amounts of company stock in their 401(k) retirement plans, while top executives allegedly pocketed fat profits by selling before a plunge in Enron's share price.

``I have great concerns for ... (those) who put their life savings aside and, for whatever reason, based upon some rule or regulation, got trapped in this awful bankruptcy and have lost life savings,'' Bush told reporters at the White House, saying the groups would take a ``good hard look'' at the matter.

Email this story - View most popular  |  Printer-friendly format

Earlier Stories
Bush Reviews Pension, Disclosure Rules After Enron (January 10)
Bush Orders Pension Rules Review After Enron Woes (January 10)
Bush Orders Treasury to Review Pension Rules (January 10)


President George W. Bush is introduced at the Pentagon January 10, 2002 to sign the Defense Department Appropriations Bill. Concerning the collapse of Enron, Bush ordered reviews of pension and corporate disclosure rules of the company, which was a key contributor to the Bush presidential campaign. (Win McNamee/Reuters)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Jorge
So what exactly is Bush charged with?
I still haven't seen anything.
He has been found guilty of being a Republican President with a DIMocRAT "plurality" in the Senate. :o)
21 posted on 01/10/2002 5:15:28 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The press is trying to equate Enron and Whitewater. There are too many differences to enumerate, but here are a few.

1. Whitewater was primarily HILLARY. They needed cash. They actively participated in a scheme to defraud people - including their friends. Many people in Arkansas never heard of Whitewater until it became a scandal.

2. Enron has been and is in the public eye for years. SEC, the press, stockholders, board of directors, anyone and everyone had access to their activities. GWB did not take any money from Enron except as a perfectly legitimate and legal campaign contribution - recorded in the proper fashion.

3. Whitewater had limited players - all taking a virtual vow of silence and covering up for each other - until Jim McDougall decided to spill the beans. But by that time, he was ill - making him the male equivalent of 'nuts and sluts' - except this was 'sick and senile'.

4. Someone at Enron will talk - probably a lot of someones. They will turn on each other like rats. There's not going to be a Susan McDougall - (not) pretty in orange - willing to go to the slammer as a favor for Bill.

5. GWB will cooperate, but he will not be a patsy. He also will not lie. This is where his straight-shooting type of talk will pay off. He will get the benefit of the doubt from all but the most rabid left-wingers, and of course, the press. In the past month, he has exhibited a very savvy approach to taking on his enemies in a field where his experience is fairly limited - politics. He can now take on his enemies on a playing field where his experience is considerable - energy.

6. The Dems will try to tar and feather GWB and Cheney with the 'BIG ENERGY' mantra. This is the one area where they will both have to be in-your-face defiant of the environmentalists.

7. Hillary tried to stonewall Whitewater - in the face of advice from nearly everyone. Why? She was guilty - she knows it and we know it. GWB is going to encourage the Enron investigation . Why? Because he's innocent - he knows it and WE know it - now we will have to wait for the investigation to prove it.

8. Is there a big mess w/r/t Enron? Of course, and probably a great deal of culpability on the part of the executives - if it can be documented. The SEC will be under scrutiny, too.

9. Remember how everyone hated Ken Starr because he was 'effeminate' and 'pasty' looking, etc.? Well, put a picture of Henry Waxman in your mind's eye. He's not going to glean a lot of support either. Who wants to watch him on TV all day? Rosa Lauro, Patty Murray?

10. I know I'm going to get flamed again (I do every time I bring this up), but GWB needs to replace Ari Fleischer. He cannot handle the press on this issue; they will chew him up. It's so bad now that I cringe every time I see him step up to the podium. Nice guy? Yes. Smart? Probably. Press Secretary? Bush can and should do better.

Terry Keenan (FOX) gave Bill O'Reilly an excellent summary the other night. She said savvy investors did not put a lot of money in Enron because they were trading broadband instead of dealing in energy. She said 'what does an energy company know about broadband? It made ME very suspicious and it should have made the employees very suspicious too.' O'Reilly admitted he had shares in Enron and he wanted a 'full investigation'. She suggested that if Enron was worthy of investigation, then so were many other companies.

There's way too much wailing and gnashing of teeth about this. GWB's got a lot at stake and I for one would never want to play poker with him. Besides, he's from TX and they just love a good fight. The Democrats may be biting off more than they can chew.

Bush & Waxman - wanted dead or alive. Wanna bet who wins?

22 posted on 01/10/2002 5:16:34 PM PST by SmartBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
By Arshad Mohammed, ooops was I profiling?

One of OBL's boys.


23 posted on 01/10/2002 5:24:14 PM PST by BobbyK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Like I said, if bankruptcy is the help they got from all their money and their "calls" to the White House, we're ALL in a lot of trouble, eh?
24 posted on 01/10/2002 5:27:19 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
So what exactly is Bush charged with? I still haven't seen anything.

Apparently his admin is charged with meeting with Enron people and talking with Enron people. I read an article yesterday with a headline something like, "Cheney admits Enron Influenced Energy Policy." What the article actually said was that Cheney said that he met with Enron six times. That's it. That's the big admission.

25 posted on 01/10/2002 5:40:59 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: D2BAH
I'd rather not hear the demoncraps who covered and excused clintons' fat butt for 8 years open their yaps about THIS deal.

And I'd prefer the Republicans not use the fact that the Dems are immoral louts to excuse their misdeeds. If there is any truth to this the Republicans should persue this with gusto. AND, they should point out ad naseum how they go after corruption whereas the Dems let it fester for 8 years. But, I dont think the national Republican party has any principles either.
26 posted on 01/10/2002 5:41:35 PM PST by verboten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I think Brit's people hit this dead-on tonight, especially Kondracke, which surprised me.

The "sharks in the water" remark by Feinman indicates just how overblown the press is making this affair in re: Bush/Enron. This will turn out to be a financial scandal.

Enron was engaging in funny stuff and the smart guys on Wall Street knew about it, which is why Enron was tailing off throughout the summer.

So in October, Lay calls Evans and O'Neill and intimates that there might be need for Federal help. O'Neill shields the President (God knows how many Freepers have been asking for his scalp, I don't know why) and directs his undersecretary to investigate whether the Administration should push for a bailout of Enron.

The Undersecretary, apparently a good Republican who believes that There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch, recommends no dice. O'Neill says no. Evans says no. Lay and Enron are out of luck. Three weeks later, he's in bankruptcy court.

For the Democratic theory to be correct, Bush should have helped Enron get a bailout to help his rich cronies hold on to their stock values.

But he didn't. That's where this whole thing is going to fall apart.

Meantime, however, there will be some good to come of this. Apparently, Enron higher ups were selling stock as fast as they could while the little guys were getting screwed. And they lied to their auditors, the SEC, and Wall Street.

That's called bad juju.

There will be an insider trading scandal because of this and several Enron execs will be attending seminars at Club Fed. Bush will make sure that this happens.

Needless to say, Enron's CEO is off of the Bush family Christmas card list.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

27 posted on 01/10/2002 5:47:36 PM PST by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: section9
One of the last checks Enron wrote was to the DNC for $100,000.
28 posted on 01/10/2002 5:51:26 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
``The White House had knowledge that Enron was likely to collapse but did nothing to try to protect innocent employees and shareholders who ultimately lost their life savings,''

That's all you got, nostril-boy?

29 posted on 01/10/2002 5:52:48 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Enron did try to get a auto industry type of bail out. They went bankrupt, meaning NO special consideration.

End of Whitehouse story.

30 posted on 01/10/2002 5:58:26 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: D2BAH
These are documents destroyed by a major accounting firm. They know better. They also know that the financial system in the U.S. hinges on disclosure and faith. It is hard to imagine the preasure it would take for Anderson to do something like this.....incomprehensible.
31 posted on 01/10/2002 6:08:03 PM PST by kampeska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: verboten
"I'd prefer the Republicans not use the fact that the Dems are immoral louts to excuse their misdeeds."

Please cite the misdeeds of which the Republicans stand accused.

32 posted on 01/10/2002 6:11:09 PM PST by moneyrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Enron/Clinton connections.
33 posted on 01/10/2002 6:18:13 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
It is surely the fault of the Bush administration that Enron cooked the books.

Works every time as in the lib formula/logic 2+2 equals 7.

34 posted on 01/10/2002 6:23:33 PM PST by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Apparently his admin is charged with meeting with Enron people and talking with Enron people. I read an article yesterday with a headline something like, "Cheney admits Enron Influenced Energy Policy." What the article actually said was that Cheney said that he met with Enron six times. That's it. That's the big admission.

Right.
I've been hearing this stuff on the radio talk shows......and I keep listening, waiting for them to add something of substance that makes this such a huge "scandal".....and there's NOTHING.

Nobody even calls in to discuss it because there is nothing to talk about.

This is so typical of the Democrats. Trying to smear and damage Bush with these blown up non-issues.

Remember the huge revelation about Bush "drunk driving" that was supposed derail his campaign?

How about the HUGE Seminole and Martin County absentee ballot scandal that was supposed to end Bush's chances of winning the FLA recount? That huge "crime" turned out to be nothing.

Then Bush was trying to poison us with arsenic in the water.....and he was supposedly "changing Taiwan policy" and going to get us in a war with China.....and his missile defense backing out of the ABM treaty was going to return us to the cold war arms race with Russia....etc. etc. etc.

I'm sure there's plenty others can add to this list...but let's face it...the Dem's are always running around sounding the alarm like a bunch of hysterical children.

I suspect this Enron "scandal" is more of the same.

35 posted on 01/10/2002 7:12:05 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I wish Fineman would come out and support President Bush against the lying media and RATS! He has credibility and he knows darn well President Bush is not involved in this. Thanks for the info - and if you think Williams is bad, you should have heard Judy Woodroof and John King and Bill Press on CNN! You would have been screaming - I was.
36 posted on 01/10/2002 7:45:48 PM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
I just can't do that to myself anymore. Just can't.
37 posted on 01/10/2002 7:47:25 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"I have never discussed with Mr. Lay the financial problems of the company."---George W. Bush, January 10, 2002

Or, to paraphrase: "I did not have financial discussions with that man, Mr. Lay."

Give me a break!

38 posted on 01/10/2002 8:15:36 PM PST by Judge Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Pardon my ignorance but, wasn't enron one of the companies that California couldn't pay during their energy crisis?
39 posted on 01/10/2002 9:02:35 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
It's very possible, but I can't confirm.
40 posted on 01/11/2002 5:25:24 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson