Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Only 11 nuclear bombs to 'take out' Canada
The Ottawa Citizen ^ | 7 January 2002 | David Pugliese

Posted on 01/07/2002 3:00:55 PM PST by RicocheT

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-209 next last
To: Loyalist
Most countries as a viable economic and stable government would be toast after a nuclear strike of that magnitude. I was commenting on the viability of the landmass to harbor life in the aftermath. 11 nukes would not have a huge effect on Canada in that regard.
101 posted on 01/07/2002 7:27:12 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Actually, Canada would be in a comparatively good position after an attack. With the cities and their populations gone, it would have a small, widely-dispersed rural population that would be fairly well equipped to survive as agriculturalists and hunter-gatherers. The US, on the other hand, would likely wind up with far too many survivors of the initial attack, and the ensuing disease, famine, organized crime, etc, would be comparatively worse.
102 posted on 01/07/2002 7:33:50 PM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Lessismore
I concur completely!
103 posted on 01/07/2002 7:34:50 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

Comment #104 Removed by Moderator

To: coteblanche
ROFL! I don't think anyone is actually aiming for you folks! :)
105 posted on 01/07/2002 7:49:40 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

Comment #106 Removed by Moderator

Comment #107 Removed by Moderator

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: Poohbah
Give 'em credit, they sent us Mario Lemieux (Go Pittsburgh Penguins!)
109 posted on 01/07/2002 8:49:07 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Snowyman
Soe, yous think we be in debt by accident? As President-for-Life Reagan said..."What are they going to do...evict us?!!" We know you've got money...but you know...maybe we also know that you like someone close by to sell stuff to. You DO have more mooses...not to mention bears and millions of other cool stuffs, which we hope you're all protecting, and feeding enough Wisconsin cheese to...so we had better yet get along, and stop all this scare the Canadites, and pi$$ 'em off real good just by typing, snowball fight over the stream crap...which...I was not really much of a part of. Of.

You see, I believe in Sgt. Preston...and would NEVER abandon "King," for any reason. Why do you think we have nukes...and blow off fireworks and even some of our own fingers every July 4th...it's the "cheese"...feed them the cheese...and nobody gets hurt.

Fondest Muttly regards to the denizens of the always quite nice and beautiful land of the frozen cheesemoose, et. al.

P.S.: and no matter what some of our friends here may say...we really like your coo-coo clocks!

110 posted on 01/07/2002 11:37:10 PM PST by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Key Events & Causes: War of 1812

Treaty of Ghent, December 24, 1814 Ghent, Belgium: British and American diplomats agreed on status quo ante bellum.

Battle of New Orleans, January 1815, New Orleans: Jackson's forces defeated British. 700 British killed, 1400 wounded. U.S. losses: 8 killed, 13 wounded.


I believe that last attempt helped them change their minds.
111 posted on 01/08/2002 12:01:07 AM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
if England had not been distracted by Continental misadventures

IF? IF? IF nothing. We WON period!

112 posted on 01/08/2002 2:45:10 AM PST by watcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
Our overseas trade was destroyed, and our national capitol torched. We make much of the frigate actions, because they are the only bright spot on an otherwise pathetic naval situation. We did NOT accomplish any of our national objectives from when we declared war--we did not grab a good chunk of Canada as we had planned, and indeed the war ended with a return to the status quo ante that we went to war to overturn in the first place!
113 posted on 01/08/2002 4:37:06 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
you may be right, but I can travel anywhere in the world with a maple leaf button in my lapel and not have to worry about getting my nuts shot off.
114 posted on 01/08/2002 10:53:35 AM PST by canuckwest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT; Lazamataz
Paging Laz...
115 posted on 01/08/2002 10:55:04 AM PST by bootless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuckwest
That's because nobody knows what it is. I notice you say "shot off" not "froze off."
116 posted on 01/08/2002 12:38:18 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
"There is no way 11 warheads could take out 25% of the Canadian population."

If you're looking for straight kills, maybe even less than eleven...just the greater Toronto area alone has nearly 20% of the Canadian population.

Totally off-topic question: Why take some of the richest farmland on the planet and put your biggest city there? Gotta love our crack planning departments up here...or is that planning departments on crack?

117 posted on 01/08/2002 12:46:37 PM PST by badfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Scully
While these numbers are staggering, most deaths would occur in highly localized areas. I agree with RadioAstronomer’s assertion that after a brief period of time survivors would be able to move about in less urbanized areas without much chance of further gross exposure. Many people would survive, although most likely not as anything even remotely resembling a political power

So basically, after a Nuke war, the "Blue Zone" would be wiped out and there would cease to be a federal government? And this is a BAD thing????

118 posted on 01/08/2002 1:02:21 PM PST by LN2Campy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: LN2Campy
LOL! You've got a point!
119 posted on 01/08/2002 1:45:00 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: LN2Campy
I'm not sure were the American politicians intend on hunkering down, but I know where the Canadian ones do. It'll be interesting, if the day ever comes, when they come crawling out of their air-conditioned, sanitized, rations for all, courtesy of the Canadian people hole in the ground and are met by those representing the remains of the Canadian population. All properly armed and totally pissed off.
120 posted on 01/08/2002 3:40:16 PM PST by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson