Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Loyalist
Most countries as a viable economic and stable government would be toast after a nuclear strike of that magnitude. I was commenting on the viability of the landmass to harbor life in the aftermath. 11 nukes would not have a huge effect on Canada in that regard.
101 posted on 01/07/2002 7:27:12 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer
Actually, Canada would be in a comparatively good position after an attack. With the cities and their populations gone, it would have a small, widely-dispersed rural population that would be fairly well equipped to survive as agriculturalists and hunter-gatherers. The US, on the other hand, would likely wind up with far too many survivors of the initial attack, and the ensuing disease, famine, organized crime, etc, would be comparatively worse.
102 posted on 01/07/2002 7:33:50 PM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson