Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists planted hairs from lynx in 3rd forest
Washington Times ^ | 01/04/2002 | Audrey Hudson

Posted on 01/03/2002 10:25:56 PM PST by Pokey78

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:50:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Government scientists planted samples of lynx hairs in a third national forest, according to documents obtained by The Washington Times.

"A preliminary investigation by the U.S. Forest Service said planted samples were submitted from the Mount Baker/Snoqualmie National Forest in Washington state, but the report did not say how many additional samples were submitted from that region.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enviralists; klamathbasincrisis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2002 10:25:56 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Shouldn't these people do time? Taxpayer fraud, or something?
2 posted on 01/03/2002 10:37:55 PM PST by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Interesting- I wonder how much more of these types of shenanigans have been perpetrated by the commie leftist wacko environmentalists? I have a feeling that a lot of our evironmental policies are based on fraudulent data such as what is mentioned in the article- but I suppose we here at FR already knew that.
3 posted on 01/03/2002 10:41:25 PM PST by Major Matt Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Standard procedure: only the whistle-blower will be punished.
4 posted on 01/03/2002 10:45:49 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Uh-oh, the plot thickens!

Please bump this to the usual suspects. I don't know the list.

The report said one state scientist has acknowledged sending an additional three samples of bobcat hair taken from a pelt and labeled as lynx, but the laboratory reported that five samples were submitted.

Whoa there, maybe the WA state scientists really were trying (sloppily) to check for false positives! The WA state people were the ones who gave their samples non-existent location numbers.

5 posted on 01/03/2002 11:05:51 PM PST by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
Standard procedure: only the whistle-blower will be punished.

Sadly. And how pathetic is that? It's really very frustrating.

6 posted on 01/03/2002 11:06:54 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: *enviralists
Hey-there's-a-bump-list-for-this BUMP.
7 posted on 01/03/2002 11:12:21 PM PST by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Wonder how many spotted owl feathers were planted during that hoopla?
8 posted on 01/03/2002 11:26:58 PM PST by jrewingjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
The lynx hair bombers have struck again, or is it yet? A proper punishment for such capers would be to scatter the guily one's hair across three forests.

I wonder when the Justice Department will find time to prosecute this case of fraud and deception? Perhaps Bush will have to exercise his Presidential privilege because it truly is a problem of national security when government starts being this manipulative and underhanded.

9 posted on 01/03/2002 11:29:41 PM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Does this surprise anyone? The lengths to which these people and their special interest groups will go to, are seemingly unlimited. You'd could almost see these groups gathering together to protect a species of fish that isn't even endangered, to the detriment of thousands of farming families.
10 posted on 01/03/2002 11:29:50 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Go Klamath Basin people too!
11 posted on 01/03/2002 11:57:05 PM PST by steelie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason
My guess is that most of the enviro regulations are based on junk science.

I was researching the arsenic rules, last summer because our local paper was making a big deal of the Democrat claim that Bush was trying to poison the children by not lowering the arsenic percentage. I found this great website with all these studies that showed that arsenic and selenium were related, in that one cancelled out the other (it's more complicated than that). But when Bush passed the Clinton standard in October, I went back to the website and the finished report had deleted all the studies which showed that arsenic was not really poisonous as long as selenium was also present (it usually is because they are both found in areas of former volcanic activity). And to make matters worse, the author of the bogus study was put in charge of inacting the arsenic rules.

12 posted on 01/04/2002 12:01:04 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

    "They don't care about the lynx but about how much land they can tie up," the staffer said.

 

And they are doing it on your dime. Your tax dollars. How come these bums are not fired at a time when many other Americans are out of a job? Let these jokers try their luck in the real world. Talk about living a charmed life!

13 posted on 01/04/2002 12:14:09 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
These are government employees, they can't do anything wrong they can't be held accountable. Pathetic. Anyone know any good manatee recepies??? Maybe know how to attract spotted owls for dinner?
14 posted on 01/04/2002 12:42:54 AM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: meadsjn
Standard procedure: only the whistle-blower will be punished.

Probably why the whistle-blower reported it just the day before he retired.

16 posted on 01/04/2002 1:10:41 AM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
That tears it. Next time they want to close off a forest because an endangered critter is present; they need to provide four pelts of said critter verified to have been shot in said forest.

Four should be enought to establish that there ARE said critters present. No more "hairs".

17 posted on 01/04/2002 2:33:19 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; editor-surveyor
e-s, for your ping list.
18 posted on 01/04/2002 2:38:44 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I went back to the website and the finished report had deleted all the studies which showed that arsenic was not really poisonous as long as selenium was also present

A tip for everyone - If you see material on the web that you think you might want to use again, bookmark it AND save it to your hard drive. Disk space is really cheap.

19 posted on 01/04/2002 2:42:33 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"Had the whistleblower not tipped this off, we may never have known about it," said one source close to the investigation.

OK, I'll ask the obvious question...Considering this scheme and the global warming fiasco, How much more of what we think is "environmental science" is total bullsquat?

I'll also venture the first quess at slightly more than half.

20 posted on 01/04/2002 3:47:29 AM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson