Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pledge of Allegiance Under Attack Again
newsmax ^ | dec 12th

Posted on 12/12/2001 10:48:50 AM PST by classygreeneyedblonde

Left-wing intolerance and censorship never ends, does it? Here's yet the latest example of P.C. idiocy:

A Virginia man is trying to censor recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in schools because, he claims, the words exclude foreigners and "offend" some people.

Edward Myers, a software engineer from Sterling, has filed a "civil rights" petition with the U.S. Justice Department to dump the pledge in favor of patriotic songs and sayings that are neutral to religion and citizenship and thus more "inclusive," the Washington Times reported today.

"The pledge is being sold as a uniform activity, but the problem is it is not inclusive of those who are foreign nationals. Certain religious groups also oppose it because it pledges allegiance to something other than their god," Myers whined.

"While I am not thrilled about the national anthem as an option, it would be better than the pledge because there is a difference between respecting another country and bowing in allegiance to it."

He is urging students to boycott the pledge every Friday.

Loudoun County school board member John A. Andrews told the Times he did not see what the "brouhaha is about."

"What will it be next? That we are not supposed to sing 'God Bless America'? I don't know where something like that ends," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Too bad about the foreigners this is ours not theirs
1 posted on 12/12/2001 10:48:50 AM PST by classygreeneyedblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
"The pledge is being sold as a uniform activity, but the problem is it is not inclusive of those who are foreign nationals. Certain religious groups also oppose it because it pledges allegiance to something other than their god," Myers whined.

Sounds like there are no schools and there is no God where this critter is from. Could he be from...H*ll????

2 posted on 12/12/2001 10:54:36 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
Feel free to tell him what you think of his lawsuit. (703) 404-0866 There are soooo many nuts out there aren't there. This guy needs the old swift kick in the pants to some other country.
3 posted on 12/12/2001 10:57:51 AM PST by Cosmologist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cosmologist
I agree with you
4 posted on 12/12/2001 11:00:39 AM PST by classygreeneyedblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
words exclude foreigners and "offend" some people.

Too bad! GO HOME!! You and your once-a-month-bath-stench are offensive to me!

5 posted on 12/12/2001 11:03:17 AM PST by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
Where do they find these people? What possible benefit can this joker derive from making people unhappy? I guess we will just have to stop the idiot in court.Must be an OUT OF WORK software engineer.
6 posted on 12/12/2001 11:06:23 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
Pledge of allegence is required step in acquiring US citizenship. I suppose it is natural that everybody who gave it in bad faith or recanted, has to be stripped of his/her citizenship.

It seems to me that it will be a horrible discrimination if naturalized citizens would be singled out this way, so it seems necessary to also strip citizenship from any US citizen by birth if he/she had developed problems with pledge of allegence or its parts ( e.g. 'flag', 'republic','under God', 'single nation indivisible', 'liberty', 'justice' or 'for all').

7 posted on 12/12/2001 11:07:31 AM PST by alex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
I n the words of the imortal Merle Haggard,"If you don't love it leave it, when your runnin' down our country man your walkin' on the fightin' side of me.
8 posted on 12/12/2001 11:09:21 AM PST by sean327
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
Myers whined.

Do I have to say anything else?

9 posted on 12/12/2001 11:17:45 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
a software engineer from Sterling

Umm.. yea... I'm gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you there. Yea...

-from Office Space

10 posted on 12/12/2001 11:22:49 AM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Myers whined.

Do I have to say anything else?

What are you talking about?

11 posted on 12/12/2001 11:46:31 AM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
This idiot doesn't understand that it is pledge "under God", not instead of. But, then again, this country is full of morons who were never educated in the public school system.
12 posted on 12/12/2001 11:49:18 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alex
...'under God'...

It is perfectly reasonable to expect loyal citizenship out of people who don't think there is a 'god'. Under the Constitution, the law cannot mandate that someone either except or deny the existance of a god. The Pledge of Allegiance" is lame. I've been an officer in the US military. My oath was to "protect the Constitution and the Nation from all enemies, foriegn and domestic". Allegiance to a 'flag', a piece of cloth, is absurd.

I say, dump the 'pledge' and replace it with something more substantial.

13 posted on 12/12/2001 12:16:59 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
A Virginia man is trying to censor recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in schools because, he claims, the words exclude foreigners and "offend" some people.



14 posted on 12/12/2001 2:07:58 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
My oath was to "protect the Constitution and the Nation from all enemies, foriegn and domestic"

You say "WAS". It sounds like you currently feel no responsibility to protect the Constitution and the Nation from all enemies. What say you now?

15 posted on 12/12/2001 2:08:02 PM PST by J Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: J Jay
What say you now?

You're somewhat peculiar! I was comissioned 30 years ago. I never resigned, nor did I recant the oath. Though I haven't been on active duty for many years, I am still an active citizen. Perhaps you don't catch the difference between 'was' as applied to chronology rather than 'state of being'.

Understand?

16 posted on 12/12/2001 5:38:22 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
This is the tread where I find some un-First Amendment attitudes.
17 posted on 12/13/2001 5:51:55 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson