Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEVELOPING: 'IT' REVEALED; 'SEGWAY' SELF-BALANCING PEOPLE MOVER
Drudge ^ | Dec 2, 2001

Posted on 12/02/2001 7:17:04 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort

Just a headline so far.....Matt must be writing the copy now


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last
To: Bogey78O
Like they say, "Great minds run in the same ruts!"

While I was typing my dissertation, you were posting your short, succinct idea. Great!

Gotta learn to be less long winded, I guess.

101 posted on 12/02/2001 11:21:02 AM PST by hadit2here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Ohmigawd!!! It can only go..........sideways!!!! We'll have t'.............have t' move ALL of the streets n' stuff!!!!!
102 posted on 12/02/2001 11:21:06 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I live in an area that wil soon be covered in snow...if "IT" ain't enclosed and got a heater...I ain't interested!
103 posted on 12/02/2001 11:21:18 AM PST by grumpster-dumpster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadit2here
Great minds don't always think alike. Just in the same fashion. 8-)

I did enjoy reading your more elaborate explanation.

104 posted on 12/02/2001 11:35:45 AM PST by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

Hmmmm, the problem is washing machines, so WASH-IT will beat your clothes against the rocks for you, freeing you for other more productive activities. Earth friendly and convenient.

Sure, it'll will be great for pedestrian scale areas, such as downtowns and high-density areas. But it will also reduce sidewalk capacity(due to speed differential with walkers, and larger space per person required). So the next step will be to widen sidewalks and reduce street capacity. Mega-public works dollars to dole out to Democrat contractors, mega-campaign bucks under the table to Democrat candidates. But then the cry will be to close the downtown streets to autos. This will be fine for those living within IT distances, but commuters from the suburbs will be inconvenienced and forced onto mass transit. Thus IT will be used politically as an exclusion device, to disenfranchise or penalize "evil" suburbanites who "promote sprawl" and who just so happen to vote conservative. Exclusionary and descriminatory politics from those who preach against such, imagine that.

Beside the safety issues, there are convenience ones, such as carrying capacity, sitting verses standing, protection from the elements. (And if you are protected by a shell, how do you communicate with whoever else you are travelling with, walky-talky? How romantic, so back to the car for Saturday nite trips to the theater.) So it is not all-weather friendly. Certainly these can be address and designed into future models, but that increases size, and approaches the automobile. Same for speed. The concept is interesting and has its place, its all about increasing transport capacity and urban density, while reducing scale, the amount of land devoted to transportation, and the pace of urban expansion. However, rather than being viewed as an added transport choice(which it ultimately will become) Democrats will frame the debate as an alternative that should restrict the auto, and in effect all the freedoms the auto provides. Restrict movement, restrict freedom, reduce the ability to escape inner/large city politics, thus increase the ability to control the population. And how you like to evacuate on a scooter, not much protection from nuclear fallout or other substances(unlike the increased protection of an enclosed vehicle). How would you like to commute through rough neighborhoods, easier for Cincinnati type thugs to pull you from a scooter than a car.

Ultimately, this will just be a huge diversionary argument for Democrats to pontificate and use against Republicans. A decade from now we will have pretty much won the arguments as the public experiences and then recognizes the limitations as IT fails to deliver the Utopia the liberals will promise. But how much time and discussion will be misdirected from revealing their true lies, shortcomings, and bad ideas on more important issues, while we defend the merits of the auto provided freedom that should be common sense? OBTW, before some of the brainwashed here go off on how the auto is destroying the planet, lets be clear. I am a proponent for mass transit, but can't stand the myths used to promote transit, nor the attempted wasteful misapplication of transit where it is inefficient. Bottom line, the argument is about allowing full individual freedom and choices(including group travel), or restricting choices to better control the masses.

105 posted on 12/02/2001 11:57:52 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
He's just revealing the details now so his liberal buddies can use it as an argument against drilling in ANWR .
106 posted on 12/02/2001 12:17:01 PM PST by mseltzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
With no power, will IT go up hills as well as down? Or will we find large gatherings at the foot of inclines?
107 posted on 12/02/2001 12:29:29 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Chariot of the gods?
108 posted on 12/02/2001 12:44:32 PM PST by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
I have a pickup truck. My wife has a car. I don't see this product impacting my life.

Interesting verb choice . . . .

Ok, now that you mention it, I *can* think of one way it could impact my life - or at least my bumper. BEG. :->

109 posted on 12/02/2001 1:41:23 PM PST by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
The bicycle is not "self"-balancing" - ask anybody on one.
110 posted on 12/02/2001 1:42:35 PM PST by Tunehead54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I have a pickup truck. My wife has a car. I don't see this product impacting my life.

Maybe we can use it for off road activities?

My pickup is 4wd. Perfect for off road activities.

111 posted on 12/02/2001 1:46:25 PM PST by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Count me in as one who believes this invention could change the world. Of course it won't happen overnight. The first automobiles were nothing the average person wanted any part of. It wasn't until automobiles came with electric starters, heat, comfortable seats and a roof over their head before they really started taking off.

I believe the first generation of this scooter will be for mostly mailmen and enthusiasts with some money to burn. Maybe even a few people will zip through Pentagon hallways with them and in other very large office buildings and factories with them. But have no doubt about it, this product will continuously improve to the point that you can pack your groceries in them and have a roof over your head for when it rains and even have a GPS navigation system in them where you can punch in a destination and read the paper during your morning commute. Then everybody will want one.

I don't think they will replace cars for most people but they will undoubtably complement the car. For example, if you live in the suburbs and work in the city, you can drive your car to a parking garage just outside the city and then take your "scooter" out of the trunk for the rest of the day. No dealing with gridlock and trying to find a parking space in the middle of the city. Just zip in and zip out, running some errands along the way.

The only downside I see with them is that they will make us even more fat and lazy then we already are!

112 posted on 12/02/2001 1:58:33 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Well, personally, I don't think this has much use for anyone. But, that's just me.

Inventors: we need something that flies!

113 posted on 12/02/2001 2:00:22 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Captain America
Let's see.....a family of six would have to spend $18,000 +(at $3,000 a piece) in order to scoot IT around town. I think I'll keep my minivan.
114 posted on 12/02/2001 2:13:47 PM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
What will a lady do without a mirror to put on one's lipstick? Heavens!.......? What waste of technology! (Puke)
115 posted on 12/02/2001 2:14:07 PM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
"With no power, will IT go up hills as well as down? Or will we find large gatherings at the foot of inclines?"

ROFLOL I hadn't thought about that.

116 posted on 12/02/2001 2:16:29 PM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Hey, whatda' think the standard and fully-loaded versions will be equipped with?

Rear view mirrors, sound system (well, that ought to improve the quality of downtown life. NOT!), a fan for hot weather.....leather interior..... LOL

117 posted on 12/02/2001 2:19:32 PM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Crashed my brand new motorcycle and had to have extensive back surgery.

Ouch!

Veteran myself of an encounter on my '85 NightHawk and a car ... minor, non-life threatening injuries involving a fractured pelvis ...

118 posted on 12/02/2001 2:42:58 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Of course ten years later, some twit in an Olds '98 rear-ended my Chevette at an intersection.

Ahh, I remember (not fondly) my Sh!tvette. I had a bumper sticker on the back:

0 to 60 in 5 miles.

119 posted on 12/02/2001 2:44:30 PM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
But have no doubt about it, this product will continuously improve to the point that you can pack your groceries in them and have a roof over your head for when it rains and even have a GPS navigation system in them where you can punch in a destination and read the paper during your morning commute. Then everybody will want one.

By that point they would practically be cars, and almost as expensive.

120 posted on 12/02/2001 2:47:32 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson