Posted on 11/24/2001 10:05:49 AM PST by ChaseR
I heard you on JW last night. Yes, I remember hearing about your visit to the Washington dinner to honor the late hero Rick Rescorla.
I was kicked out of a coffee shop this afternoon for questioning some anti-american "art" displayed in view. The "art" in question displayed two t-shirts with such statements saying "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, what is that all about? What the f*** is that? What's with all this 'The American Dream'? What the f**** is that? F**** that!" Ironically to say, there was some flyer posted below the t-shirts stating "think diversity".
And it just went on and on. Anyways, when I politely questioned the attendant behind the counter, he got very defensive with me and started to question my political standing. When he asked what my thoughts were about this "art", I told him I thought it looked like shit and that it was defamatory and seditious against those serving to protect this country of ours. He threw me out automatically. I, of course, left with good grace and called up the Welch Report on AM 830 KPLS with Kevin Shannon later that Sunday and revealed this to his guest speaker who happen to be an expert on "diversity" issues.
I must say, my friend, that not only has the war come home but we must fight this battle as we have those in our society, who are doing everything possible in the dark to destroy this country while the real heros are out there fighting this evil battle.
Can one imagine their children walking into a place like that and upon surveying the environment questioning mom and dad what the four letter word in question means?
I'm not running from a thing. The question is meant to take the heat off of Clayman because, deep down, you know what I am saying is true and deflection is your only defense. If his evidence and skill and desire for justice is so overwhelming, he'd have pocketed money for his clients. I'll ask you again to refresh my memory on that. Which client has he recovered for?
Couldn't agree more, Ms. Jade. China's move towards "Capitalism Far Eastern-style" is replete with Bribery of Public Officials, retention of monopolistic practices, and the murder of those who don't play along. Those on the Radical Left--including the LameStream Medyuh--would have the American Sheeple believe that that's the way all business is conducted, both in China and in America. However, the Truth is that those practices--Bribery, Monopolies, and State-sponsored Murder--used to be seen as Illegal in America until Clinton and his Raping Thugs got into Power and committed all these crimes and went unpunished...so far!!
IMHO, Ron Brown's death was no more an "accident" than Jim McDougal's or Vince Foster's!! Bill Clinton is a Conspirator to Murder and in a Just World would be FRIED fer his crimes!! While I'm not optomistic that we can get Clinton into Ol' Sparky, there ain't a doubt in my mind that Slick Willie Shall Die in a Cold, Lonely Prison Cell!!!
Sic Semper Tyrannus...MUD
Through Judicial Watch Don and Teri Adams received a rather sizeable amount of money via R. M. Scaif for their legal expenses--a lot more help than anyone else has done...what help is BITCHIN and bellyacheing going to do for them all?
The biggest complainers and critics are the brain dead crybabies in their dirty diapers crying all the time...you--your play pen pals/gals!
Oh yeah...your LTV comments were infantile too!
Yup.
You nailed it.
Inspires me to repeat the old saying, "The people IN the free seats boo the loudest."
...& I continue to contemplate motive, motive, motive with some of these people.
No the question is not meant to do that. I've stated repeatedly that I do not like what JW has become recently and I have no objections to people voicing their criticism of THAT transition. What I object to is this very SELECTIVE criticism and the distortion of what he could do. Do you deny that he was limited to CIVIL suits? Do you deny that the SERIOUS crimes committed by the DNC and Clinton administration (which JW was in large part responsible for uncovering and letting us know about) are CRIMINAL matters? Do you want to suggest that Reno/Clinton did a fair investigation of such crimes and tried to prosecute crimes were the evidence was suggested? Do you want to deny that the responsibility for doing that is now Bush and Ashcroft's?
I don't mind you criticizing Klayman but where is the criticism of Bush and Ashcroft? Because I don't see THAT, I'm think I'm right to be suspicious of your real motives. You seem more outraged at Klayman than the men that are ACTUALLY letting Clinton and the DNC get away with MASS MURDER, TREASON, ELECTION TAMPERING and a multitude of other CRIMINAL violations.
I don't think so. Al 'BuddhistMonk' Gore and his emails and the other missing White House emails are separate criminal violations. Of course, Judicial Watch has separate cases involving the Clinton/Gore email scandal.
Glenn, let's you and I call Janet Reno and ask her for her help in these matters.
Glenn, mumbles on, apparently not concerned about any future Chinagate investigation what-so-ever:
"How much has JW collected for their client in that matter?"
Let me be blunt. You Glenn and all these other Klayman naysayers - really surprise me. I would think that you and the others- would be interested in bastard Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Terry McAuliffe and the rest of the slimy defendents - being investigated and going on trail. And Glenn old buddy, who is the only person who is presently following up on the Clinton/Gore Chinagate Scandal. Larry Klayman.
Glenn, obviously not giving a darn about the Rule of Law, whimpers on:
" What difference did it make?"
Right Glenn, that's it.
Exactly. BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.