Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2002 Senate Elections - 34 Elections Tabulated
11-21-01 | HighWheeler

Posted on 11/21/2001 3:11:17 PM PST by HighWheeler

34 Senators will be up for election in 2002

It's time to start planning strategy.

Review the following table of all 34 of the 2002 Senate Races. Of the 34 races, several Dem Seats have a potential to be flipped to Republican (shown in green rows), a couple of Repub seats have a potential to be flipped to Dem. (shown in yellow rows) These flips are based on the some assumptions:

- Using only the 2000 Prez election results to indicate vulnerability, the green rows indicate a potential flip to Republican, The yellow indicate potential flip to DemocRAT. this assumes that Geo Bush will participate in the 2002 election campaigns and that he has coattails a year from now.
- The races in light blue are where the presidential election difference was under 5% regardless of presidential race outcome.
- The governor column is added as a reference, to indicate possible push or pull from the state's governor.
- The "Other Senator" column is added to show push or pull from the state's other senator.

There is a strong possibility that the GOP could win several key races, South Dakota being one, and turn the Senate over to the GOP with a 3 Senator margin.



No. State Incumbent Senator SenatorParty Is Senate Candidate Vulnerable To Losing Seat? (based only on state's 2000 presidential election going to other party) 2000 Presidential Candidate's Margin of victory. (neg number indicates state won by Gore) The State Governor's party & next election year State's Other Senator and party
1 Alabama Jeff Sessions Rep   14.91%    
2 Alaska Ted Stevens Rep   30.95%    
3 Arkansas Tim Hutchinson Rep   5.45%    
4 Colorado Wayne Allard Rep   8.36%    
5 Delaware Joseph Biden Dem   -13.06%    
6 Georgia Max Cleland Dem Yes 11.67% Dem 02 Zell Miller (D)
7 Idaho Larry Craig Rep   39.53%    
8 Illinois Richard Durbin Dem   -12.02%    
9 Iowa Tom Harkin Dem Close -0.32% Dem 02 Chuck Grassley (R)
10 Kansas Pat Roberts Rep   20.80%    
11 Kentucky Mitch McConnell Rep   15.13%    
12 Louisiana Mary Landrieu Dem Yes 7.43% Rep 03 John Breaux (D)
13 Maine Susan Collins Rep Yes - 5.12% Indep 02 Olympia Snowe (R)
14 Massachusetts John Kerry Dem   -27.30%    
15 Michigan Carl Levin Dem   -5.14%    
16 Minnesota Paul Wellstone Dem Close -2.41% Indep 02 Mark Dayton (D)
17 Mississippi Thad Cochran Rep   16.92%    
18 Missouri Jean Carnahan Dem Yes 3.34% Dem 04 Christopher Bond (R)
19 Montana Max Baucus Dem Yes 25.08% Rep 04 Conrad Burns (R)
20 Nebraska Chuck Hagel Rep   29.00%    
21 New Hampshire Bob Smith Rep Close 1.27% Dem 02 Judd Greg (R)
22 New Jersey Robert Torricelli Dem   -15.84%    
23 New Mexico Pete Domenici Rep Yes - .06% Rep 02 Jeff Bingamen (D)
24 North Carolina Jesse Helms Rep   12.83%    
25 Oklahoma James Inhofe Rep   21.88%    
26 Oregon Gordon Smith Rep Yes - 0.44% Dem 02 Ron Wyden (D)
27 Rhode Island Jack Reed Dem   -29.08%    
28 South Carolina Strom Thurmond Rep   15.94%    
29 South Dakota Tim Johnson Dem Yes 22.74% Rep 02 Tom Daschole (D)
30 Tennessee Fred Thompson Rep Close 3.87% Rep 02 William Frist (R)
31 Texas Phil Gramm Rep   21.32%    
32 Virginia John Warner Rep   8.03%    
33 West Virginia Jay Rockefeller Dem Yes 6.33% Dem 04 Robert Byrd (D)


Last Updated on 11/21/01
By HighWheeler


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2002senateelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: HighWheeler
Doesn't that also apply to anyone "married" to a particular party? Many on this forum believe just because a repub gets elected, then everything will be all right. Not true. No diff between the parties IMO.
61 posted on 11/22/2001 7:35:11 AM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
Rockerfella and Dominici are far from likely to lose their seats.
62 posted on 11/22/2001 7:37:52 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
Unlike us junkies, regular people in the street are incredibly stupid (they think Dems stand for the "little guy," that the GOP only represents the rich, etc), and with the Leftist media drumming that into their empty heads non-stop, you begin to get the picture.

Its scary such people exist in our neighborhoods :)

63 posted on 11/22/2001 7:40:43 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: poet
You need to sharpen your information to see some of the most obvious differences. One so big that anyone can see it is the Clintoon scandals vs. any Repub scandal. And remember, not everyone is a saint, but the reaction to a failure is what counts.

Clinton rapes women, lies under oath, has sex in the Oval Office, subborns perjury, etc, etc, etc. and all the Democrats come to his aid and give him cover.

Ted Kennedy kills a woman, makes waitress sandwiches at restaurants, etc, etc, etc, and all the DemocRATS come to his aid to cover him.

Nixon tries a cover up with Watergate and the most vocal people who convince him to resign? The Republicans. Nixon voluntarily resigns.

That Repub who was Speaker of the House for 5 minutes, has an affair and resigns.

Republicans clean house. DemocRATS embrace all deviants, criminals, liars and lowlifes and bring them into their RAThole.

64 posted on 11/22/2001 9:16:00 AM PST by HighWheeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: deport
Helms has definitely announced that he will not seek re-election. Liddy Dole has thrown her hat in the ring .... and is the only Republican with any statewide name recognition. Don't know who will be running against her. Erskine Bowles was not going to run against Helms but is apparently re-considering. Yikes!

Dole was born and raised in NC but has not lived here since her college days. The carpetbagger charge is already being thrown around .... and there is a lot of concern among conservatives about her stands on abortion and gun control.

65 posted on 11/22/2001 7:35:50 PM PST by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
Susan Collins isn't vulnerable for one reason-- John Baldacci isn't running against her because he wants to be Governor. The Dems want that Governorship next year and will spend most of their money and time to get it. King can't run again, so the Dems just have to stay focused. Collins isn't conservative enough to be considered out of step with Maine voters. Here are Bush's 2000 percentages for New England. Note where Maine ranks:

New Hampshire gave its electoral votes to Bush and the nearest non-electoral-vote-giver is Maine. This is a true indictation of where Mainers are ideologically. They aren't as liberal as the 30-percenters. The Bush's even have a home in Kennebunkport. As long as Bush doesn't embarass them while they harbor the Presidential Family, they aren't going to hold Susan's connection with Bush against her. In fact, Bush could easily campaign with her next year and it wouldn't hurt her. He couldn't do that in Massachusetts or Rhode Island for a candidate there.

66 posted on 12/19/2001 6:09:34 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
New Hampshire is a Republican state. We have problems with soccer moms, so the GOP candidate has to be a smooth talker to win. A Republican will win back the governorship next year and Shaheen would lose big to Sununu, but Smith doesn't talk smooth at all and will be beat up on like Shaheen did last year to Gordon Humphries. Humphries was a former U. S. Senator for goodness sake and was handled without much trouble by Shaheen because she knew how to play her cards against him.

Sununu looks like a nice guy and acts like one-- sort of the like the other nice guy that the state supported for President last year. Shaheen will paint Smith as a throw-grandma-in-the-street Republican and will beat him. New Hampshire voters would laugh at such a characterization of Sununu so she'd have to run on issues and there she'd lose big.

Sununu is very conservative, is pro-ANWR-drilling and knows how to work the cameras and the crowds. Smith looks like a grumpy old man to NH voters.

67 posted on 12/19/2001 6:29:28 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson