Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Mexico, Daschle, Gephardt give strongest support yet to more open borders, immigration reform
Associated Press ^ | 11/17/2001 | Associated Press

Posted on 11/17/2001 5:40:18 PM PST by t-shirt

WIRE: 11/17/2001 8:49 pm ET

In Mexico, Daschle, Gephardt give strongest support yet to more open borders, immigration reform

The Associated Press

MEXICO CITY (AP) Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt said Saturday that they would forge ahead with immigration reform early next year, including some kind of legal residency for Mexican migrants already living in the United States. Such reforms "are very consistent with fighting against terrorism," Gephardt, D-Mo., told a news conference after meeting with President Vicente Fox during the congressmen's three-day trip to Mexico.

"If you are regularizing status, you are also understanding the people you are dealing with are not terrorists," Gephardt said, noting that those who would benefit are "people who have been in the United States for a long time, paid taxes, obeyed the laws and been very good citizens."

Daschle said discussion on the reforms could be held during the next congressional session early next year. He said legalization would not be equivalent to a broad amnesty, and would require a background check and investigation.

"The opportunity for us to investigate and expel those who ought not be there is something we want to deal with, too," he added.

The two lawmakers also said they were interested in a European Union-style program of public investments and a more open border.

"I think that it ought to be our goal that we have a free pass border at some point in the future," Daschle said.

Daschle's office later said he was not endorsing any particular program, but rather supported having the same freedoms on the Mexican border as those that exist on the Canadian border. Canadians do not need visas to enter the United States, but Mexicans do.

"I think it's unlikely that we will obtain that goal anytime in the short term," Daschle said. "(But) if the United States and Canada have a border like that, we ought to have the opportunity to have that kind of border with Mexico as well."

Fox, facing trouble at home on both economic and political fronts, desperately needs to make some headway on gaining better treatment for Mexican migrants to the United States, a central policy goal of his administration.

Daschle and Gephardt said Mexico's concerns hadn't fallen from the U.S. agenda in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

"Our commitment (to bilateral issues) is every bit as strong as what it was on Sept. 10," Daschle said, noting that Congress is expected to vote in the next few days to suspend "for at least one year" an anti-drug certification program that has angered Mexicans.

The certification procedure required the State Department to judge other countries' anti-drug efforts and threatened the loss of financial aid for nations that failed the test.

Mexicans, and many other Latin Americans, considered that an affront to their sovereignty.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
they want them votes
1 posted on 11/17/2001 5:40:18 PM PST by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
In Mexico, Daschle, Gephardt Give Strongest Support Yet to More Open Borders, Immigration Reform By Mark Stevenson Associated Press Writer Published: Nov 17, 2001

MEXICO CITY (AP) - Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt said Saturday that they would forge ahead with immigration reform early next year, including some kind of legal residency for Mexican migrants already living in the United States. Such reforms "are very consistent with fighting against terrorism," Gephardt, D-Mo., told a news conference after meeting with President Vicente Fox during the congressmen's three-day trip to Mexico.

"If you are regularizing status, you are also understanding the people you are dealing with are not terrorists," Gephardt said, noting that those who would benefit are "people who have been in the United States for a long time, paid taxes, obeyed the laws and been very good citizens."

Daschle said discussion on the reforms could be held during the next congressional session early next year. He said legalization would not be equivalent to a broad amnesty, and would require a background check and investigation.

"The opportunity for us to investigate and expel those who ought not be there is something we want to deal with, too," he added.

The two lawmakers also said they were interested in a European Union-style program of public investments and a more open border.

"I think that it ought to be our goal that we have a free pass border at some point in the future," Daschle said.

Daschle's office later said he was not endorsing any particular program, but rather supported having the same freedoms on the Mexican border as those that exist on the Canadian border. Canadians do not need visas to enter the United States, but Mexicans do.

"I think it's unlikely that we will obtain that goal anytime in the short term," Daschle said. "(But) if the United States and Canada have a border like that, we ought to have the opportunity to have that kind of border with Mexico as well."

Fox, facing trouble at home on both economic and political fronts, desperately needs to make some headway on gaining better treatment for Mexican migrants to the United States, a central policy goal of his administration.

Daschle and Gephardt said Mexico's concerns hadn't fallen from the U.S. agenda in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

"Our commitment (to bilateral issues) is every bit as strong as what it was on Sept. 10," Daschle said, noting that Congress is expected to vote in the next few days to suspend "for at least one year" an anti-drug certification program that has angered Mexicans.

The certification procedure required the State Department to judge other countries' anti-drug efforts and threatened the loss of financial aid for nations that failed the test.

Mexicans, and many other Latin Americans, considered that an affront to their sovereignty.

2 posted on 11/17/2001 5:45:24 PM PST by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Canadians do not need visas to enter the United States, but Mexicans do.
3 posted on 11/17/2001 5:48:01 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
I suggest we close the border while they are still down there and not let them back in.....in the interest of national security.
4 posted on 11/17/2001 5:50:37 PM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
they want them votes

Haven't we been told that they are cultural conservatives who will surely vote Republican?

5 posted on 11/17/2001 5:53:10 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
In Mexico, Daschle, Gephardt give strongest support yet to more open borders, immigration reform

Just seen on Americas Most Wanted how terrorist are entering our Country on our southern border. How many more innocent American lives are going to have to die before Daschle and Gephardt get it?

6 posted on 11/17/2001 5:53:52 PM PST by healey22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
And of course the GOP will use this against Daschle and Gephart in a vicourous PR campaign

I ain't holding my breath
7 posted on 11/17/2001 5:53:55 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21
Most Canadians go back home, Most Mexicans don't.
8 posted on 11/17/2001 5:54:39 PM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: healey22
We have got to do something about these "jerks" from letting more sloth into the country. Enough already!
9 posted on 11/17/2001 5:56:16 PM PST by nagdt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nagdt
Bombard your congressman and the President with phone calls and tell them this is insane.
10 posted on 11/17/2001 5:57:51 PM PST by healey22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Lock the doors. Put out the No Vacancy sign. Post a note on the Net, "Don`t call us we will call you". There is NO SHORTAGE OF PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY. No more room at the inn. Stay in your own d*** country, stay out of mine.
11 posted on 11/17/2001 6:00:11 PM PST by vladog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JD86
that's not fair.

there are 20 auto lanes of traffic at the san ysidro border because there's a lot of business.

many americans live in mexico and cross to work in san diego.

many mexicans live in mexico and work in san diego.

people on both sides cross frequently to do business and shop.

not to mention tourism.

and then there's the large american retirement community in mexico.

border transactions are only going to increase.

12 posted on 11/17/2001 6:00:11 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Why is this being called "reform"? The word is often taken to imply some sort of improvement, which this could never be.
13 posted on 11/17/2001 6:01:47 PM PST by Temple Drake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21
that's not fair.

what's not "fair" about it? I am not talking about the daily traffic across the border in border towns....I am talking about the ones who come across on a 3 day pass or a 7 day pass and end up in Kentucky and Colorado years later.....Personally, I have never met a Canadian who was not in the US legally....of the Mexicans I have met....I would say it is 70/30....with the 30% being legal. And I do not live in a border state.

14 posted on 11/17/2001 6:07:04 PM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ken21
people on both sides cross frequently to do business and shop.

and do these people have to get a visa to go across the border for one day? I am asking because I do not know. I used to live in Texas and in California but I have never had a desire to go to Mexico.

15 posted on 11/17/2001 6:09:28 PM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JD86
I suggest we close the border while they are still down there and not let them back in.....in the interest of national security.

LOL!!!! Thanks JD86 - that's the very FIRST thing about Dasshole & Little Dickey that I've laughed about!!

16 posted on 11/17/2001 6:10:42 PM PST by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Glad to be of service.
17 posted on 11/17/2001 6:11:32 PM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JD86
i've met a lot of illegal canadians, south africans, aussies, irish, english, etc here in socal.

they blend in because they have relatively easy cultural and linguistic access.

18 posted on 11/17/2001 6:11:35 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ken21
Mexicans who learn to speak English can blend in too....
19 posted on 11/17/2001 6:13:07 PM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JD86
americans cross frequently to shop and do business.

i have a mexican dentist. she costs 1/3 of what dental work in san diego costs.

many americans go down to get their prescriptions filled.

20 posted on 11/17/2001 6:13:59 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson