Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last of Dead Sea Scrolls About Ready to Publish
Associated Press ^

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:02 PM PST by Asmodeus

Associated Press
November 16, 2001
Last of Dead Sea Scrolls About Ready to Publish

NEW YORK -- Half a century after the first of the Dead Sea Scrolls was found in desert caves, archeologists celebrated the near completion of the publication of the ancient texts.

"It's a very happy moment that we can say today that all this is completed," Emmanuel Tov, the project's editor in chief, said Thursday at the New York Public Library.

"After 54 years of excitement, expectation, tribulation, much criticism and a little praise, with the help of much inspiration and even more perspiration, the publication has been finalized." The scrolls, which date from 250 BC to AD 70, were discovered between 1947 and 1956 in 11 caves overlooking the western shores of the Dead Sea.

For decades, access to the complete scrolls was tightly guarded by a small group of international scholars. After the release of bootlegged copies of some of the texts and an archive of scroll photographs, a new group of nearly 100 scholars took charge of the scrolls in 1991. Tov, a professor at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, was named to head the project, pledging to expedite its publication.

The 900 scrolls and commentaries in 37 volumes were primarily written in Hebrew and Aramaic on more than 15,000 leather and papyrus documents. They were found near the ruins of the ancient settlement Hirbet Qumran, nine miles south of Jericho in the West Bank.

They are believed to have been written by the Essenes, an austere, insular Hebrew sect.

Scholars consider the scrolls a treasure of Jewish history and religion. They provide insights into what the Hebrew Bible looked like more than 2,000 years ago. They also contain prayer texts, biblical interpretations, fragments of poetry, compositions on wisdom and various sectarian documents.

Tov and his colleagues said that nothing in the scrolls is likely to shed a negative light on Judaism or early Christianity as once was thought possible. Tov said Jesus was not mentioned in the scrolls, noting that most of them were written before Jesus was born.

The work "leads us to believe that the Bible went through many stages of changes," Tov said.

Tov's team, overseen by the Israel Antiquities Authority, has issued 28 volumes; two more are in their final stages. They are published by Oxford University Press under the general title "Discoveries in the Judean Desert."

One scroll contains a Hebrew song of thanksgiving that Tov and his colleagues dedicated to New York City in honor of its steadfastness following the Sept. 11 terror attacks: "Bless the one who wonderfully does majestic deeds, and makes known his strong hand."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deadseascrolls; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; israel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: follow your bliss
hi bliss
thanks for your link
I found it interesting
I'm interested in both the Dead Sea Scrolls and Zecheriah Sitchens
Love, Palo
21 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:45 PM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Where can I find a copy ?
22 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:51 PM PST by michaelje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ethan_Allen
FWIW, Revelation wasn't included in early canonical Bible versions.
23 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:57 PM PST by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
FWIW, Revelation wasn't included in early canonical Bible versions.

It's not as simple as that. There were many different early, regional canons. Revelation was included in some before it was included in others. On the whole, it was one the last books to be included in the over-all, more universal canons. See The Canon of the New Testament and The Text of the New Testament by Bruce Metzger for a detailed overview of the whole thing. It's fascinating. However, it'll disappoint some folks who posit the existence of ecclesiastical cabals dedicated to suppressing the "true" early New Testament documents. There's no evidence of anything like that. For that matter, most of the major Christian doctrines regarding Jesus can be found from non-New Testament sources or from sources quoted in the earliest New Testament writings, putting their origin back to the decade immediately following the crucifixion. The idea that a long period of oral tradition of non-miraculous stories eventually culminated in the creation of miraculous legends centuries after the non-miraculous events has been proven to be completely untenable.
24 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:59 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
Nope. I'm saying that as God, Jesus had the final say in the book of Revelation. His Word remains the same....yesterday, today, and forever. (Hebrews 13:8-9) (John 1:1-14). Believing the Bible to be the inspired word of God, I personally believe this book to be his 'final answer'. My personal belief.
25 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:00 PM PST by Ethan_Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Does anyone need Dead Sea Scrolls Books?

In the mid 90s I was struck by the Scrolls bug and began reading a great many books relating to the scrolls, history & archeology of the levant, and the historical Jesus. These books were hard & soft back copyrighted from the 50s to '96. The collection includes most of the modern day scholars as well as those from the fifties. Many of these books are out of print. A few of the authors: Thiede, Morton Smith, Wise-Abegg-Cook, Golb, Burrows, Eisenman, Shanks, Silberman, a Whiston translation of Josephus, Mansoor, Edmund Wilson, several of Allegro's books including the "mushroom" book, Pagels, Vermes, Baigent & Lee, Brandon(2), Lohse, Moscati, Chiera, Frankfort, Albright(3).

I also have 11 volumes on the Crusades including Runciman, Salidin, Anna Comnena diary, and one on the Albegensian crusade.

I also have 17 volumes by non-scholastic authors including Hancock, Cremo, Stichin, Baigent & Lee, Gardner, Knight & Lomas.

Would someone please buy all these books from me?

26 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:00 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rebdov
I seem to recall that the scrolls were imaged and available for researchers. I saw a few pics and they looked kinda rough to me, but I'm sure the scholars can get plenty out of them.
27 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:00 PM PST by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ethan_Allen
These sets of scrolls appear to be particularly unreliable as one of the book is entitled "Menu for Man" . . . .
28 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:01 PM PST by job
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
What happened with the scrolls was not at all unusual. Any scholar that has discovered a cache of valuable historical documents holds onto them for as long as he can wring everything out of them that he can for his own professional purposes. Sometimes they get passed on to his graduate students or associates. This is no different from someone discovering a literal goldmine or emerald and gold-choked shipwreck.

Except that the scrolls were not "discovered" by the scholars; they were almost all discovered by Bedouin Arabs.

29 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:02 PM PST by be131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: job
You serious or are you pulling my leg? Sorry I can't stay for your answer; gotta go, but I'm LOL if you're serious!
30 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:03 PM PST by Ethan_Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: job
Actually, I'm laughing even if you're not serious. Thanks, I needed that!
31 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:03 PM PST by Ethan_Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I was just simplifying on Revelation, but thanks for the exposition :)

Regarding the cabals - the motivation ascribed to the Catholicism, ie the truth of the scrolls will destroy Christian doctrine, holds no water IMHO. There is plenty of evidence to question Biblical truth, if one so desires. However, I do believe that the original scroll researchers "conspired" to withold access. Not because of doctrinal controversy, but merely hubris stemming from their exclusive academic position.

32 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:03 PM PST by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Last of Dead Sea Scrolls ...

Not in this day and age it isn't. By this time next Christmas, prepare for "The Scrolls Done Gone," an unauthorized sequel to the Dead Sea Scrolls, told from the view of a half-Roman brother to one of the Essenes.

33 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:04 PM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lyford
Re: Dead Sea Scroll Deception

"As I recall, it reads like much of the Kennedy assassination stuff."

Excellent analogy. As I recall the authors attemped to present St. Paul as the false teacher described in the scrolls. Most of their "evidence" was rather spotty and open to multiple interpretations. It was really nothing more than a vicious attack on the Vatican and Christianity in general.

34 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:05 PM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sonrise57
Also, the Scrolls support the idea that the Hebrew text was complete and codified by the time of Christ. The Scrolls refer to three divisions of sacred writing, the torah, the prophets and the writings. Jesus refered to the same division.

More in the nature of scholarly quibbles than serious disagreement:

1. The text of each of the books of the Hebrew Bible was certainly fixed by the time of Jesus, but there were a handful of books whose status (in the canon or not) was still being debated until about 170 C.E. (Song of Songs made it in by one vote; Ben Sirach stayed out by an almost-as-close vote; a few others were also in dispute for a while).

2. I am no scholar of the Christian Scriptures, but in the parts I have read, Jesus refers to "the law (torah) and the prophets (nevi'im)"; I've never seen a reference to the "writings" (q'tuvim).

35 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:07 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
See The Canon of the New Testament and The Text of the New Testament by Bruce Metzger for a detailed overview of the whole thing.

Bump for the outstanding Metzger books.

36 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:08 PM PST by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sonrise57
You're right about Qumran. I meant to say Nag Hammadi.
37 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:08 PM PST by codeword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: Asmodeus
Why should it be any suprise that the scholarly will try to dispute the validity of the Bible? It seems those who are immersed in the secular arts have a preconcieved hostility towards christianity and judaism. Here is what I say. Hold them accountable by demanding that they produce the originals as well as the translations so that the correct translations can be verified. There are numerous examples of poor translation of the scriptures leading to the meanings being skewed. For instance the verse "Thou Shalt Not Kill" in the KJV bible. Going back to the original greek it reads more like this "Thou shalt not commit murder". There is a distinct difference between the definitions of kill and murder. Kill encompasses all killing whether premeditated or in self defense. Murder only applies to premeditation with malicious intent. Killing in self defense is not considered murder under biblical doctrine and is considered acceptable. However the liberals (Read Commies and Peaceniks) would like us all to believe that all killing is wrong. Well, sometimes extreme circumstances require extreme measures!
40 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:11 PM PST by First Strike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson