Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Security panel to call for national identity cards
Newsday.com ^ | 11/14/01 | MARC HUMBERT (AP Writer)

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:01 PM PST by LuvItOrLeaveIt

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:32 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

ALBANY, N.Y. -- A special anti-terrorism committee created in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center will call for creation of a national identification card system, its chairman said Wednesday.

State Sen. Roy Goodman, who created the panel on Oct. 10, said the recommendation would be one of 50 to be made public at a Thursday news conference in New York City.


(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
What's going on here? Why would a New York "Security Panel" call for a National ID card? I'm a bit confused. Please go easy on me, this is the first time I've posted an article like this. The talk of a National ID card really bothers me and makes me think of Revelations in the Bible.
1 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:01 PM PST by LuvItOrLeaveIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LuvItOrLeaveIt
How an ID makes one to think of Revelations but let me go along with that thought for a minute.....

If it makes you think of Revelations in the Bible, you should welcome it ... that means we are getting closer to the end times, right? I don't remember Revelations saying anything about the "end" being an "option"

If it's destiny, welcome it, the closer we are to meet our maker!

2 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:02 PM PST by AgThorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuvItOrLeaveIt
They can "recommend" anything they want. Since these panels are usually comprised of big government types, look for lots of horrific ideas amongst the fifty.

They'll undoubtedly be a call for some mandatory sensitivity training for somebody, an expansion of federal control over various aspects of our lives, some nice big fat dollar figure for increased federal spending on some vague "restructuring and reorganization" project (they love those), and a bunch of other crapola.

Their recommendations are no more binding than they are productive.

3 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:02 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuvItOrLeaveIt
Asked about civil liberty objections to national ID cards, Goodman said, "The Constitution does give the right to privacy, but not the right to anonymity."
True... have to remember that one.
4 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:03 PM PST by AgThorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuvItOrLeaveIt
Well, if you think that's scary, go to The US Patent Office and search patent number 5,878,155, which is a method for the magnetic tattooing of human beings for the purpose of secure monetary and credit transactions...
5 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:13 PM PST by Demosthenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn
Thank you, after reading your post I feel much better!

:-)

6 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:21 PM PST by LuvItOrLeaveIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LuvItOrLeaveIt
I knew that you would!!! ;-)
7 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:22 PM PST by AgThorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rowdee; seattlesue; redrock; Mercuria; tex-oma; Uncle Bill; HAMMERDOWN; AuntB; Jolly Rodgers; Abundy
From the article:

Goodman, who is also chairman of the state Senate's Investigations Committee, said the nation's private aviation system represents a "gigantic loophole" in security planning.

"You can load anything you want onto them, totally unsupervised, and these are not all tiny Piper Cubs. They can be enormous passenger planes," the Manhattan Republican said. "You load that with fuel and plow it into the U.N. building and goodbye U.N. building."

Anti-UN sentiment?


The senator said the universal identification card system would utilize high-tech microchips storing digitized fingerprints, facial characteristics and retinal images.

Goodman said the panel had not yet decided if the ID card system should be mandatory or voluntary, but that in his opinion a mandatory system would "maximize safety and security."

("They hate us for our freedom. They hate us for our freedom. They hate us for our freedom......")

8 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:40 PM PST by Benighted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuvItOrLeaveIt
We already had a national commission that looked into this and recommended it be iniatiated. The chairman was ex-Dem representative Barbara Jordan and I can't remember who the Republican vice-chair was.

I'd rather have an id card than have my social security card used as an id number as many businesses and my university do.

9 posted on 11/16/2001 1:11:40 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benighted
("They hate us for our freedom. They hate us for our freedom. They hate us for our freedom......")

Well, at least Senator Goodman is finding a way of addressing THAT foreign relations problem, hmmm?

What a SMART GUY!

gettinscrewedperhapst@tooed.CON?

10 posted on 11/16/2001 1:12:03 PM PST by Mercuria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Benighted
Another Republican bass-turd! Where do these worms come from?Fadderland Sekurity Forces, Czars, ID cards! What a joke Amerika is fast becoming.

Of course, they hate us--we just might stand up to the bass-turds. The brain dead aren't smart enough to realize that the 'forgeries' will be even better than the originals!

12 posted on 11/16/2001 1:12:42 PM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Benighted
".....national identity cards"

Not on my watch.

redrock

13 posted on 11/16/2001 1:13:55 PM PST by redrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Benighted
("They hate us for our freedom. They hate us for our freedom. They hate us for our freedom......")

I guess the intent is to make certain "they" don't hate us anymore? Right? So if we take away our own freedoms there can't possibly be any reason to hate us! Right??!!

It is sad to think the legacy of those lives that were so violently taken on 09/11 will be the destruction of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

"A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.

An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victim, and he wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared. The traitor is the plague." Cicero

14 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:14 PM PST by seattlesue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LuvItOrLeaveIt
"The talk of a National ID card really bothers me and makes me think of Revelations in the Bible."

You get the picture. Now couple this with the new anti-terrorism laws and the UN call for global disarmanent and s standing army to enter any nation they choose. Like it's scripted right out of the Bible.

15 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:18 PM PST by Wolfhound77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Mercuria; tex-oma; Rowdee; seattlesue
They wanted "Know Your Customer" legislation, and they got it. They wanted "sneak 'n peek" legislation, and they got it. They wanted to destroy doctor-patient, and lawyer-client, confidentiality, and they've done so. They want to print, probe, scan, and tag every non-threatening citizen (not because they suffer perversions, mind you, but to promote feelings of "security" </sarcasm>) and, with continued patience, they'll likely have that cheap thrill to enjoy, too.

Evil-minded outsiders have a friggin' lot to learn about terrorizing Americans--which, I s'pose, is why they come here to pursue their studies.


I guess the intent is to make certain "they" don't hate us anymore? Right? So if we take away our own freedoms there can't possibly be any reason to hate us! Right??!!--seattlesue

Crud, I sure hope so, -sue. I mean, it'd really, really, really suck if this was all for nothing! (gettinscrewedperhapst@tooed.CON?--Mercuria)


"They hate us for our freedom. They hate us for our freedom. They hate us for our freedom......"

17 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:44 PM PST by Benighted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: redrock
Hey, buddy, good to see you. How've you been?
18 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:45 PM PST by Benighted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn
Asked about civil liberty objections to national ID cards, Goodman said, "The Constitution does give the right to privacy, but not the right to anonymity." True... have to remember that one.

Actually the Constitution doesn't "give" a single right. Its a statement that governments are instituted to *secure* those rights, not hand them out. The idea is that rights are inherent in our nature as human beings, and that we institute governments to guarantee those rights against those who would try to deny them. But whether denied or not, those rights still exist.

More germain to the post in question, though, is the 10th amendment. Whatever items are not delegated to the U.S. government are reserved to the states or to the people, respectively. Now, nowhere in the U.S. Constitution do I see where the FedGov has any, *any* power to enact a national ID. That means that according to the 10th Amendment, they cannot Constitutionally do so, period, end of discussion.

Of course, for the command and control folks, this will come as bad news on their little journey down the road to the Perfect Police State (tm), but facts are facts.

If they institute this evil, horrid idea, I withdraw my consent to be governed by these bozos. Its as simple as that.

19 posted on 11/16/2001 1:15:30 PM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Good grief.

Lumberjack, check out Benighted's post. They've got their eyes on private aviation, too.

Thanks for the heads up Tex!

Well, I'll tell you this much for free. I will do two things (maybe more, but I won't go into details on them because doing so can now label me a "terrorist"). First, withdraw my consent to be goverened by these animals. Second, demonstate to them how easily technology is foiled, especially this kind of technology. I can program biometric SDK's in my sleep, and I can certainly reverse engineer anything programed by another human being and twist it to my own ends. Do it all the time, just for fun, when I'm bored.

The other items I *may* do? Well, I guess we'll have to wait and see. You Command And Control freaks, just try and pass this crap. You want to end America and plunge us into a Civil War II? Keep up with your Gestapo wet dreams.

Acuerda puerca, le llegue su noche buena!

20 posted on 11/16/2001 1:15:31 PM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson