Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOCKHART: Some actions by the current administration “troubling” and “dangerous”
MSNBC ^ | 10/17/01 | Jeannette Walls

Posted on 10/17/2001 6:15:15 AM PDT by Brian Mosely

Oct. 17 — Bill Clinton’s former press rep has some harsh words for the way George W. Bush’s people have been dealing with the press, calling some actions by the current administration “troubling” and “dangerous.”

JOE LOCKHART, a White House press secretary under Bill Clinton, gave a talk in New York on Monday evening to some public relations students.

In particular, sources say, Lockhart singled out what he called the “shifting explanations” that the Bush administration gave to the media as to why they shouldn’t run the full text of Osama bin Laden’s taped message.

When called by the Scoop, Lockhart re-iterated his comments. “The first reason they gave [that bin Laden’s speech might contain coded messages] is legitimate. Protecting people’s lives is legitimate. However, the shifting explanations were troubling. If it’s just that they don’t want [bin Laden] to get free airtime, that’s very troubling. It’s not the government’s job to tell journalists what they should do. That’s very dangerous.”

Lockhart also singled out recent comments by Charlotte Beers, the new undersecretary of state for public diplomacy. Beers told the Wall Street Journal that it was her task to “redefine what America is” to the world, adding, “This is the most sophisticated brand assignment I have ever had.”

“The government shouldn’t be deciding what makes us good and then advertising it around the world,” Lockhart told The Scoop. “We’re not a product. We’re not to be sold. I thought it was a little dangerous if bureaucrats are getting around the table deciding what’s good about us.”

Lockhart was speaking as one of the panelists at “Power, Politics & Prima Donnas,” sponsored by the Center for Communications at Rockefeller Center.

Lockhart pointed out to the Scoop that he has been largely positive about the current administration. When asked how he thinks his successor, Ari Fleisher is doing, Lockhart said, “He’s doing great. It’s in this little thing you sign when you leave. Whenever you’re asked, you have to say it. He’s doing great. It’s my answer and I’m sticking with it.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2001 6:15:16 AM PDT by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
If there's one thing this bug-eyed piece of dung knows about it's "shifting explanations."
2 posted on 10/17/2001 6:18:41 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
wipe your chin bug eyes.
3 posted on 10/17/2001 6:18:44 AM PDT by Rustynailww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
It’s not the government’s job to tell journalists what they should do. That’s very dangerous.”

They really don't see the irony, do they???

4 posted on 10/17/2001 6:20:19 AM PDT by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
This fatbody needs to shut his piehole.
5 posted on 10/17/2001 6:20:43 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
The last administration was is fact, troubling and dangerous. It is the reason for the present problems.
6 posted on 10/17/2001 6:21:20 AM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
“We’re not a product. We’re not to be sold.

(gasping for breath, holding stomach, wiping tears from face)

Stop, Joe, yer killin' me here...ha-haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...

7 posted on 10/17/2001 6:21:34 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Lockhart is a classless piece of Shiite. Ari is 10 times the man he'll ever be and it eats him up inside.

The media may be free to air whatever it wants- but the airways belong to the federal government. If they don't want Bin Laden's propaganda being aired, that's just the way it is. The administration is being nice by asking them not to air that crap...

They don't have to be nice if they don't want to.

8 posted on 10/17/2001 6:21:48 AM PDT by Slim Pickens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Plug your orifice, Mr. Lockhart. You don't have anything credible or relevant to contribute to this discussion.
9 posted on 10/17/2001 6:21:55 AM PDT by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Even if there aren't any "coded messages", why should we even permit his face and voice to encourage any of his people or sympathizers already in this country?

Where's the common sense in giving him a forum to spout his hate?

10 posted on 10/17/2001 6:22:07 AM PDT by mor40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Lockfart... "I just perfected the art of telling the truth slowly". His quote. It should've been... I lie through my @ss to cover for x41.
11 posted on 10/17/2001 6:23:20 AM PDT by sidegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
He is an idiot, who points away from the real danger to the United States.

THIS is what is dangerous:


12 posted on 10/17/2001 6:24:44 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
L...calling some actions by the current administration “troubling” and “dangerous.”

“The government shouldn’t be deciding what makes us good and then advertising it around the world,” Lockhart told The Scoop. “We’re not a product. We’re not to be sold. I thought it was a little dangerous if bureaucrats are getting around the table deciding what’s good about us.”

Why can't Lockhart see what a moron he is?

I guess hummers in the Oval Office isn't dangerous

I guess giving (selling?) military secrets to China isn't dangerous.

I guess bombing asprine factories to divert attention away from your personal flaws isn't dangerous.

I guess putting national security at risk by carying on with an intern isn't dangerous.

Come on Joe, give us all a break and shut up! Nobody cares what you think.

13 posted on 10/17/2001 6:25:48 AM PDT by rogers21774
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
When asked how he thinks his successor, Ari Fleisher is doing, Lockhart said, “He’s doing great. It’s in this little thing you sign when you leave. Whenever you’re asked, you have to say it. He’s doing great. It’s my answer and I’m sticking with it.",

On top of everthing else, he still hasn't learned any manners. What a graceless jerk. He is the poster boy for the former administration.

14 posted on 10/17/2001 6:26:05 AM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Uh...this from a guy who was press secretary when OBL managed to slip away from the camp an hour before the Clinton cruise missle attack.

Lockhart, your credibility is nil--remember who you had to defend daily, hourly as press secretary.
15 posted on 10/17/2001 6:26:33 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
In particular, sources say, Lockhart singled out what he called the ?shifting explanations? that the Bush administration gave to the media as to why they shouldn?t run the full text of Osama bin Laden?s taped message.

Monica was just another intern. She was a stalker. She was a close friend and Clinton was just ministering to her. They did not not have innapropriate sexual relations. It's just spinach dip. The president never asked anyone to lie. It's okay to lie about sex. The president didn't send cruise missiles to distract from Monica's testimony, etc.

The irony here is almost overwhelming. Why does anyone listen to what he has to say anyway, since it's now obvious that all he did in his job was lie the whole time?

16 posted on 10/17/2001 6:26:45 AM PDT by The Enlightener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
LMAO! This from the man who DIDN"T WANT TO KNOW WHAT PREZ CLINTON WAS DOING BECAUSE HE DIDN"T WANT TO HAVE TO LIE ABOUT IT! This is rich!! That Lockhart needs to do something more constructive. What a loser! YOU AREN"T IN POWER ANYMORE!!!
17 posted on 10/17/2001 6:26:59 AM PDT by MoJo2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
This guy worked for a perjuring rapist traitor and lied his butt off at every opportunity. Now he criticizes the actions of this administration as "troubling." Hubris.
18 posted on 10/17/2001 6:27:46 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
George Orwell, call your office.
19 posted on 10/17/2001 6:28:38 AM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
This is the best the left can do bring this clintoon apologist squealing pig out to be critical of a real president.
20 posted on 10/17/2001 6:29:09 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson