[American Soldier]

I might've required an explanation for the "Christianize 'em" suggestion and an apology for the "swarthy" comment, but I think canning her was a mistake.

[Northpaw]

GO ANN! Screw the mealy-mouths.

[Plummz]

Asked for comment, National Review Online Editor Jonah Goldberg said: "We didn't feel we wanted to be associated with the comments expressed in those two columns. We got a lot of complaints from sponsors and a lot of complaints from readers left, right and center. We've decided for editorial reasons we think are sound that we're no longer going to run Ann Coulter's syndicated column."

Uh-huh. Didn't Trixie's boy call for conquering Africa a few months ago? How is what Coulter said substantially different?

[Arthur McGowan]

Ann was writing hours after the death of her good friend Barbara Olson. And what she said in both columns was basically true.

[Alberta's Child]

She said yesterday that National Review Editor Rich Lowry and his deputies "are just girly-boys."

Does anyone have an e-mail address for Ann Coulter? I'd like to meet this feisty dame and teach her to play hockey.

[independentmind]

On Maher's ABC show, Coulter accused National Review of having "censored" her by refusing to run the follow-up column. She said yesterday that National Review Editor Rich Lowry and his deputies "are just girly-boys."

I love it! She is absolutely correct.

[Ymani Cricket]

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity,"

forced conversion? sheesh. Back to the dark ages.

[looscannon]

ANOTHER reason to not read National Review.

[ppaul]

National Review cans Columnist Ann Coulter

How could they?

You're either with Ann Coulter - or you're with the terrorists!

:

[JMJ333]

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity," the conservative commentator declared in her column on National Review Online.

Convert them? How? By force? Somehow I doubt they would've welcomed us with open arms.

[Alberta's Child]

In a related story, Alberta's Child expressed some disappointment and extreme envy about this turn of events.

"Damn it!" he said, "I've wanted to 'can' Ann Coulter for a long time!"

[First_Salute]

National Review practicing the "measured response."

[winstonchurchill]

I have been a subscriber to National Review since 1956 (yup, I was 13), but I've had it with the current group of -- well, 'girly-boys'.

Ann, of course, is right. Invade, kill the leaders and convert them -- one could say, finish the Crusades and make the world a better place.

After 45 years, I'm done with NR.

[Vindibudd]

Okay, This is an Ann Coulter thread, now where is her picture?!

[StormEye]

National Review went down the drain of Political Correctness quite awhile ago in my opinion. Firing Ann Coulter is their homage to the "diversity is our strength" crowd.

[StoneColdGOP]

Note to National Review:

BAD MOVE!

[LibWhacker]

Ann Coulter doesn't need RINOs! They need her.

[ladyinred]

I just got a big mailing from National review trying to get me to subscribe! They mention Ann Coulter as one of their great contributors! I am going to return the card refusing since they fired her!
If even the conservatives are going to go for a PC war, we are in trouble.

[jeremiah]

National Review, that's the main Republican ragmag headed by W.F Buckley is it not? Well the left wing of the Republican party has just fired the first shot in the war that will tear apart the GOP if they continue to alienate the right. What is wrong with the truth? Here is some truth, the citizens of America are at war, the govt is wobbling. The citizens of America are ready to sacrifice and win, the govt is studying. Gen Shelton resigned today, any link to our weak response to an attack?

[BluesDuke]

Well, no one ever accused Jolly Jonah of being especially tolerant of those with whose views he demurs to even a single degree. Remember - all it takes is for him to pout even once and Mommie Dearest bans the miscreants' Websites from having their material posted as threads on hers.