Skip to comments.
'Bombing' of TWA Flight 800: Reed Irvine reveals new admissions by Stephanopoulos and Kallstrom
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Thursday, September 20, 2001
| Reed Irvine
Posted on 09/20/2001 12:47:40 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: independentmind
I didn't say it would be a good, or even acceptable judgement call. It would have been a Clintonesque judgement call, and, unfortunately, within his authority.
To: JohnHuang2
Well, this should concern all the conspiracy minded even more than you think, because he didn't say SHOOT-DOWN or "MISSILE ATTACK" but BOMBING. So what if your missile theories are really off and that maybe the FBI lied, but it wasn't a missile after all? That would mess up more than a few theories around here.
My point is, if you are going to parse words, do it right.
62
posted on
09/20/2001 9:52:52 AM PDT
by
LS
(schweikart@erinet.com)
To: JohnHuang2
Thanks Big John!
To: independentmind
The current administration does not need to critisize the Ex-"doesn't know how to smoke a good cigar" President. Looks like it all will eventually come out in the wash.
To: _Jim
Who should we call to report your MIA status?
To: independentmind
"That is an amazing statement. The same kind of national security that failed to detect critical weaknesses in airline security? I'd amend that comment as follows:
"That is an amazing statement. The same kind of national security that failed to detect act on critical weaknesses in airline security?"
There. But I hesitate to sieze on this issue given that it's now moot and we face a long bloody war as a result. We now have only to act and let the historians sort out the recriminations.
To: Lockbox
Why at this time did both Mr. Stephanopoulos and Mr. Kallstrom bring up TWA 800? Probably a slip of the tongue.
67
posted on
09/20/2001 10:06:15 AM PDT
by
6ppc
To: Yellow Rose of Texas
Jet fuel burns, it is not highly combustible like gasoline. It was the VAPOR they were referring to when they said that they could not get it to ignite in the lab.
To: JohnHuang2
Let us also recall the incident in which an Egypt Air airliner containing a contingent of Egyptian commandos returning from training exercises in the U.S. was seemingly ditched in the ocean by the pilot - but later "found" to be the result of faulty hydraulics in the tail. Talk of the pilot being on a suicide terrorist mission was dismissed by those pointing to his idyllic family life.
The last thing the WTC bombers did before 9/11 was send their "idyllic" families back to Saudi Arabia.<P.
To: GretchenEE
Just as Rather has morphed into Blather, so should Peter be morphed into Petunia. The morphings fit both. "Petunia" is great. Thanks.
To: JohnHuang2
WoW!!!! My Tin Foil Hat really works....
<]:^)
Ashland, Missouri
71
posted on
09/20/2001 10:26:07 AM PDT
by
rface
To: _Jim, Registered
dashjim, you're being asked to weigh in. C'mon, be a sport.
Didn't have to pass by the hog pen on the way to the outhouse, did you?
72
posted on
09/20/2001 10:51:48 AM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: rdavis84
Bttt!
To: lsjohn smorgle
Since George S and Kallstrom talked about TWA 800 on 9/11, the first guess is they spoke the truth off the top of their heads, without talking points. Note there hasn't been a fleet of talking heads echoing what they said.
A darker thought is they knew 9/11 was coming and saw an opportunity to protect the Navy's reputation. Again, since no one has echoed, they seem to be on their own.
Interesting that George S used "bombing".
74
posted on
09/20/2001 11:56:28 AM PDT
by
Tymesup
To: Come get it
Jet fuel burns, it is not highly combustible like gasoline. It was the VAPOR they were referring to when they said that they could not get it to ignite in the lab. Actually nothing in a luquid state can burn it's the complete opposite. A liquid state removes the one portion of the fire triangle needed for fire which is oxygen. The other two parts are heat and fuel. Vapors or rather a concentration of vapors make the fuel. A lot of persons who fix leaks in gas tanks actually fill the tank with either gasoline or water but never will you find anyone willing to wield an empty gas tank. But as for 800 I think a stinger brought it down. It was hushed for reasons we now see the damage control to the stock market.
To: GretchenEE
In the current investigation, especially following the money, I wonder if both Clinton's won't be found to have taken much money from Arafat and who knows who else in the vicinity?
To: JohnHuang2
Thanks for the heads up!
To: JohnHuang2
How come these BRANIACS never address something more plausible, like the condition of aircraft, or, failures of those aircraft due to commonly known (within the aviation safety circles) systems or subsystems? It's like they have BOMB emblazened on their minds - they have a 'theory' desparately in search of evidence, evidence that is thin to non-existant in nature ...
Oh - that's right!
THOSE are kinds of stories that sell NEWSPAPERS and get WEB SITES PUBLICITY!
To persue, say, something more obscure and technically challenging would require *real* analytical skills -
- the kind of skills and ability beyond most who write books or 'dream up' whacky rivero-class conspiracies ...
78
posted on
09/20/2001 2:19:14 PM PDT
by
_Jim
To: wingnuts'nbolts
I wonder if both Clinton's won't be found to have taken much money from Arafat and who knows who else in the vicinity? Hmmmm ....... wonder if that's what all that kissin' was about? (the clintons and the arafats)
To: independentmind
"If TWA800 was a terrorist incident, the reason for the cover-up was probably to prevent the same kind of economic tremors that the more recent bombings have caused."
EXACTLY! Clinton couldn't let the economy fall on his watch...after all, he knew he had absolutely nothing to do with the economic boom this country experienced during his term. But, he was happily taking the credit for it. He had to keep the economy booming, because he sure as heck didn't know how it got started and wouldn't know how to fix it if it broke.
IT'S THE ECONOMY, STUPID!
80
posted on
09/21/2001 7:55:36 AM PDT
by
erkyl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson