Posted on 09/18/2001 1:43:21 PM PDT by pabianice
White House apologizes for using 'crusade' to describe war on terrorism
The Associated Press
9/18/01 3:37 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush regrets using the word "crusade," with all its historical connotations of religious war, to describe his campaign against terrorists, his spokesman said Tuesday.
Bush only meant to say that his is a "broad cause" to stamp out terrorism worldwide, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said.
"I think to the degree that that word has any connotations that would upset any of our partners or anybody else in the world, the president would regret if anything like that was conveyed. But the purpose of his conveying it is in the traditional English sense of the word, it's a broad cause," said Fleischer.
On Sunday, Bush had told reporters: "This crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while."
With that comment, he stoked suspicion in some Arab and Muslim quarters where crusade is a loaded term that recalls the Christians' medieval wars against Muslims in the Holy Land.
Bush is trying to rally Arab nations to join an international coalition against the perpetrators of last week's twin terrorist strikes in New York and Washington.
"I think what the president was saying had no intended consequences for anybody, Muslim or otherwise, other than to say that this is a broad cause that he is calling on America and the nations around the world to join," Fleischer said.
Really?
Then why haven't they declared jihad against Greeks? Romans? Because this conflict preexisted "Western Civilization."
That IS the big picture.
It goes back to who inherits the Land promised to Abraham's descendants. The Land which the Jews lay claim as promised to them by God, is also the Land upon which the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, walked. As long as the U.S. does not raise the sword against Israel in support of the Holy Warriors of Muhammad, it will be regarded as an enemy of Muslims among Islam's radicalized true believers.
Once again the filthy fascist social engineers (the politically correct) criticize "W" for using the word crusade. Even though "crusade" by definition has no religious precepts. This is the same group that automatically demonizes and links the ten commandments to christianity even though the jews were the ones who received them from God in the first place.
BTW. They have attacked the Italians and Greeks and damn near every other Western nation over the last 30 years. I remember one of their Zealots spraying DaVinci airport with machine gun fire killing dozens back in the 70s. They hijacked Greek cruise ships, blew up building in Germany, kidnapped British, Irish and Dutch tourists --- the list goes on. The Europeans and Israelis are the little Satins, we are the Great Satin.
And Araft is now our ally?
I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that we may as well not even get started with this war.
If this is our leaders attitude we will lose in the long haul.
If your TV picture/sound made you think that President Bush was lecturing Muslims about what it means to be Muslim then you may want to get a new TV. On second thought, forget it. A new TV probably wouldn't help.
All nations should be paying attention, because at some point in time, it will be 'their turn to be attacked with the intent, not just of causing a few deaths, but massive deaths, on their drive for an Islamic world!
I think we are in trouble.
I was afraid of that. A lot of people will have to do some growing up, or they will die. Frankly, if they can't grow up and get with the program, a lot of people will think them expendible.
These people hang together. As soon as we attack Afghanistan, we are at war with the Muslim World.
First, he needs the permission of the world to defend American shores, and now he must be politically correct. Wonderful, just wonderful.
We know you are kidding. Thanks for the laugh.
I usually regard refusing to apologize as a sign of severe psychological dysfunction and an emotional inability to accept reality. People who refuse to apologize can usually be broken into tears with the merest threat, criticism, or slap on the wrist.
The same goes for those who interpret an apology as a sign of weakness.
I assume, however, that you enclosed your statement in quotation remarks to indicate that you don't really believe in the statement, you were just quoting the conventional wisdom in some quarters. And alas, there are some people you do have to be careful about apologizing in front of, lest they do take it as a sign of weakness.
Would you care to expound on the following article for how the Muslim World would view us if we attacked Afghanistan?
Yahoo! Hong Kong - News
Tuesday, September 18 8:09 PM SGT
Defiant Taliban hit back as clerics stand by bin Laden
KABUL, Sept 18 (AFP) -
Afghanistan's ruling Taliban Tuesday told their people to be ready for a holy war as Islamic scholars gathering to decide Osama bin Laden's fate made it clear they would not hand over the man wanted "dead or alive" by the United States.
The Islamic regime's army also unleashed a fierce offensive against their last opponents within the country in a bid to pre-empt US moves to strengthen them.
The display of defiance from the Taliban came as their supporters in Pakistan mounted the biggest anti-American demonstration yet, heightening fears that any US attack on Afghanistan will have devastating implications for the stability of its neighbour. "Of course if there is an invasion of an Islamic country, there will be jihad against the invaders," a senior Taliban official told AFP as hundreds of Islamic clerics, or ulema, streamed into Kabul. "After the invasion jihad will be the only alternative and that is the obligation of Muslims."
The ulema are expected Wednesday to begin a meeting which will consider whether to extradite bin Laden, who is suspected of orchestrating last week's terror attacks on New York and Washington and has been indicted in New York for the 1998 bombing of two US embassies in Africa.
The Taliban have previously hinted they might give bin Laden up for trial in a neutral, preferrably Muslim, country. But the clerics arriving on Tuesday were in no mood for compromise.
"Even if the whole of Afghanistan is devastated we won't hand him over until there is a solid proof against him," Mullah Mohammad Hassan, a representative of Paktika province told AFP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.