Skip to comments.
What caused fourth jet to go down?
9-11-2001
| R.A. Cajun
Posted on 09/11/2001 9:30:14 PM PDT by NY Cajun
Does anyone have information as to what caused the fourth terrorist flight to go down in Pennsylvania, obviously missing it's target? I know it was being tracked prior to the crash. Did we have to shoot it down?
TOPICS: Free Republic; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
If we had to shoot this flight down my heart goes out to the fighter pilot as well as the victims and families of the downed craft.
1
posted on
09/11/2001 9:30:14 PM PDT
by
NY Cajun
To: NY Cajun
When pressed for an answer, I heard a military officer being interviewed say that he "couldn't talk about the details; they're classified."
To: NY Cajun
Local Philly TV tonight is carrying rumors from the crash scene that it was indeed shot down - authorities had received calls from the plane saying that it was being hijacked, and it was heading back toward Washington...those who know have had no comment...
To: NY Cajun
I talked to a friend who works at United Headquarters. He said that the rumor there, as yet unconfirmed, was that the last transmission they received was the pilot saying "I'm going to ditch." If this is true, then he died a hero, keeping the plane away from targets or populated areas.
4
posted on
09/11/2001 9:35:18 PM PDT
by
LouD
To: NY Cajun
Nope, it wasn't shot down. My guess is an unsuccessful takeover of control. I'm amazed that 3 of 4 succeeded.
5
posted on
09/11/2001 9:35:29 PM PDT
by
TheDon
To: Hillary 666
I would say that comment speaks for itself. Read earlier that contact with it was ignored so........... Although it is a horrible thought, they would have had no choice but to do this to save more lives.
6
posted on
09/11/2001 9:36:44 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
To: NY Cajun
Reportedly Ashcroft told members of Congress that we absolutely did NOT shoot it down (it would have been entirely justified, though). I suspect passengers tried to retake the plane but maybe the pilot was already dead by then.
7
posted on
09/11/2001 9:40:01 PM PDT
by
Sloth
To: NY Cajun
I don't know about the 4th one, but I question the one that ended up on the Pentagon - I keep hearing descriptions of how radar tracking of this plane had it on a direct course for the White House - and it made a sudden manuver and crashed into the Pentagon. Could it be that this plane, with it's ID transponders off, and probably not responding to radio calls, etc. reached the point that it was taken out by a SAM, like from the roof of the WH and that's why it crashed into the Pentagon?
Does this qualify for a tin-foil hat theory??
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: NY Cajun
My son graduated from ERAU(aerospace engineering). His take(and that of numerous former military here) was that the pilot slammed the plane into a vertical dive/spin that would be impossible to control or recover from. Based on the "crater" found and the crash site reports, this is what happened. God bless the brave pilot(s), crew, and passengers for saving many more American lives on the ground.
To: Keith in Iowa
not tin-hat, but not realistic. The planes hit where they were aiming....
11
posted on
09/11/2001 9:43:56 PM PDT
by
cactmh
To: NY Cajun
If the pilot had control, why would he ditch? If he didn't have control, how
could he ditch? I would lean heavily toward shootdown except that I would think that decision would have been made only at the last possible moment, and the aircraft was far away from any population center (more than 20 minutes from D.C.)
Maybe given the earlier events they were afraid to delay.
12
posted on
09/11/2001 9:46:03 PM PDT
by
LSJohn
To: LSJohn
But the crater that the plane caused could only have been created by a total nose dive. I say the pilot took it down -this is the plane they suspect was the threat to either Camp David or WH
To: LSJohn
If the pilot had control, why would he ditch? The pilot may have had control of the actual dials, but with a weapon to his head or neck. He may have intentionally put the plane into a dive to make sure the plane could not hit any major metro areas.
To: Keith in Iowa
Does this qualify for a tin-foil hat theory??Yes, but at this point those are welcome.
15
posted on
09/11/2001 9:53:00 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
To: LSJohn
Not quite. Scenario could be that wounded pilot smothered the controls, acted as dead weight to prevent terrorist from taking control. He knew plane would crash, but knew it wouldn't be where terrorist wantd it to crash.
To: Mighty Mouse
I think this plane was supposed to take out the Pentagon.
When the other hijackers heard it had gone down, that's when the jet reportedly heading for the Whitehouse veered off course to the Pentagon.
17
posted on
09/11/2001 9:56:05 PM PDT
by
hayseed
To: NY Cajun
If the jet was shot down there would be a debris field. The pictures and 'at the scene' accounts show no significant debris. Just a deep hole in the ground.
This suggests to me that the pilot is a hero.
18
posted on
09/11/2001 9:57:29 PM PDT
by
Mike K
To: Angus_Day
My first reaction was that it was not the U.S. Air Force, but an Air National Guard unit, that brought the plane down. I've been told they can scramble those planes faster then the Air Force can.
To: LSJohn
The story was that it was heading for Camp David, which is some distance from D.C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson