Skip to comments.
King ready to work with police over Andrew
Telegraph ^
| 09 February 2026 8:07pm GMT
| Hannah Furness, India McTaggart
Posted on 02/09/2026 5:47:10 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Monarch expresses ‘profound concern’ over younger brother’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein
The King has given his backing for Buckingham Palace to assist the police investigation into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
The monarch has authorised his officials to provide support needed to officers.
A Buckingham Palace spokesman added that King Charles had expressed “profound concern” over the claims against his younger brother and repeated his support for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
The King was heckled on Monday while on a royal engagement as pressure grew on the Royal family to compel Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to contribute to a police investigation.
The Prince and Princess of Wales made their first public comment about the Epstein files earlier on Monday, issued through their spokesman.
Thames Valley Police have confirmed they are examining allegations that Mr Mountbatten-Windsor shared confidential data with Epstein when the then Prince Andrew was working as a British trade envoy.
He has separately been accused of sexually assaulting Virginia Guiffre, which he denied, and with whom he settled in a civil claim, and of spending the night with an adult woman who was flown to the UK for sex with him.
Buckingham Palace has not yet been contacted by the police.
A palace spokesman said: “The King has made clear, in words and through unprecedented actions, his profound concern at allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s conduct.
“While the specific claims in question are for Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to address, if we are approached by Thames Valley Police we stand ready to support them as you would expect. As was previously stated, Their Majesties’ thoughts and sympathies have been, and remain with, the victims of any and all forms of abuse.”
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: andrew; britain; england; epstein; king; princeofepstein
Do Jimmy Savile next.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That would be beating a dead horse. But the former Prince Andrew is alive, and beating him would have some impact.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Andrew is small potatoes compared to the thousands of rapes of British girls a year by muzzies, but the POS Tampon King knows that.
3
posted on
02/09/2026 6:03:41 PM PST
by
HYPOCRACY
(Wake up, smell the cat food in your bank account. )
To: proxy_user
Charles, formerly known as “Prince,” participated in a lot of Jimmy’s “activities.”
4
posted on
02/09/2026 6:04:43 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democracy dies with Democrats.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I wonder how much of this might be driven by William. He will be king before too long and I’m sure he has an opinion on how it ought to be handled. And it likely will be his task to handle it eventually.
I think that Elizabeth II may not have allowed Charles to have much of a say for all of those many decades in which he was Prince of Wales. If so, I bet he felt put out and that he should have had some level of say in serious matters. If Charles did feel that he was slighted, then he would feel an obligation to work differently with William.
The era of Margaret, Charles, Anne, Andrew, Diana and Fergie was an era of somewhat loose morals. The Swinging Sixties and beyond. Charles may have some regrets about how his era behaved. I certainly get the impression that William is a serious and moral person, and I’m pretty sure that William thinks the older generation behaved badly. I don’t imagine William has the slightest bit of patience for either his brother or his uncle.
5
posted on
02/09/2026 6:09:21 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Law and Order -- only one of our political parties believes in it.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Head on a pike at the london bridge.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I’d prefer a different order of the words in the headline:
King ready to work over Andrew with police
7
posted on
02/09/2026 7:58:54 PM PST
by
decal
(They won't stop, so they'll have to be stopped)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I’m wondering if Markle’s going to show up in the files.
8
posted on
02/09/2026 8:03:06 PM PST
by
pnz1
("These people have gone stone-cold crazy”)
To: ClearCase_guy
Good Lord these people and this ‘’Medieval make believe’’ they engage in as if it were still the tenth century while their island nation has gone to ruin.
9
posted on
02/09/2026 8:06:00 PM PST
by
jmacusa
( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Who’s going to investigate MI5 and MI6 for allowing Epstein and Maxwell access to the UK’s royals, pols, bureaucrats, and businessmen for well over a decade...?
10
posted on
02/09/2026 8:12:41 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Queen Elizabeth would not be happy. Charles could have just let it rest...like the Queen did. No class...and terribly jealous of Andrew.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
12
posted on
02/10/2026 3:50:53 AM PST
by
maddog55
(The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
To: maddog55
Likely Charles was always the mean brother.
There's a reason the Queen gave her cherished dogs to Andrew and Fergie.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
14
posted on
02/11/2026 3:49:43 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴)
To: mewzilla
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧
@_HenryBolton
🚩 This is a massive red flag.
Dropping “His Majesty’s” is not simply aesthetics or style. It’s constitutional vandalism. By removing the “HM” Starmer’s Labour government is trying to remove the habit of accountability. They’re deliberately trying to get you to forget the constitutional authority to govern comes from.
It strips away the constitutional truth that ministers serve, that power is delegated by the Crown, and that the state is not the property of politicians.
This is how an authoritarian mindset alters the narrative: quietly and administratively, and denied at every stage.
Add to this the erosion of trial by jury and it becomes clear this name change is not a one-off issue, but part of a pattern. It’s a grab for self-appointed authority with reduced oversight.
(⬇️ Old logo and name and, below that, the new)
@RoyalFamily
Last edited
5:27 PM · Feb 10, 2026 208.7K Views
https://x.com/_HenryBolton/status/2021350383453409344
15
posted on
02/11/2026 3:52:00 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴)
To: mewzilla
16
posted on
02/11/2026 3:58:47 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴)
To: mewzilla
17
posted on
02/11/2026 4:24:09 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴)
To: mewzilla
It’s no coinkydink that Epstein and Maxwell targeted the House of Windsor, is it.
Nor is it a coinkydink that both MI5 and MI6 allowed it.
18
posted on
02/11/2026 4:25:59 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson