Posted on 11/01/2025 7:49:44 PM PDT by Red Badger
The Trump administration’s latest attempts to curtail press leaks disallows White House reporters from accessing the inner offices of senior communication officials in the West Wing in order to protect national security secrets.
A memo released to the reporters Friday evening addressed from the National Security Council (NSC) to President Donald Trump’s White House Communications Director Steven Cheung and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt states reporters should no longer freely walk into their offices, known as “Upper Press,” located in Room 140, just feet away from the Oval Office.
The White House’s communications staff has also begun directing communications for the National Security Council due to a recent “structural change,” the memo states. The policy cordoning off “Upper Press” thereby ensures the security of sensitive material, the memo argues.
Reporters can continue to speak with more junior press aides outside the White House Briefing Room, the memo adds.
Cheung claimed in a Friday post on X that reporters had been caught eavesdropping on meetings with senior members of the Trump administration in Upper Press. Some reporters also supposedly made surreptitious recordings of those engagements and photographed sensitive documents.
“Cabinet Secretaries routinely come into our office for private meetings, only to be ambushed by reporters waiting outside our doors,” he said.
Some reporters have been caught secretly recording video and audio of our offices, along with pictures of sensitive info, without permission
Some reporters have wandered into restricted areas (our offices are feet away from the Oval Office)
Some reporters have been caught… https://t.co/tosUqrcKGt
— Steven Cheung (@StevenCheung47) October 31, 2025
We’ve caught reporters with their ear to @PressSec’s door while she was having sensitive conversations with Cabinet members.
We’ve had to chase reporters down who started strolling into restricted areas towards the Oval.
Total absence of boundaries. https://t.co/LgWTWI9Wiz
— Anna Kelly (@AnnaKelly47) November 1, 2025
The White House Correspondents’ Association said in a statement Friday it “unequivocally opposes” the move and that the press secretary’s office has long been open for newsgathering.
“The new restrictions hinder the press corps’ ability to question officials, ensure transparency, and hold the government accountable, to the detriment of the American public,” said WHCA President and senior CBS News White House correspondent Weijia Jiang in a statement.
Statement on New Restriction on Journalists at White House. pic.twitter.com/rE7F4Ou1hh
— WHCA (@whca) October 31, 2025
Former President Bill Clinton Communications Director George Stephanopoulos blocked reporters’ access to Upper Press in 1993, overturning a 20-year precedent, according to press clips, inviting a public squabble with the press corps. Clinton soon after overturned the policy in an effort to improve his media coverage.
When Mark Gearan replaced Stephanopoulos as Clinton’s communications director, Stephanopoulos wrote to his successor in a note, “Mark, I can only give you one piece of advice: Open the hallway!” according to a 1993 USA Today report.
Make them camp out in a homeless tent.
In the Park across the street.
If we didn’t have a commie MSM, this wouldn’t be necessary.
Something tells me Trump isn't going to be susceptible to that argument.
And when all of you can conduct yourselves properly, you can sit at the adult table for dinners again instead of the kids’ card table. But not until we see some improvements.
I wonder: WWFDRD? If reporters had imagined they had free and unrestricted access to FDR’s White House in, say, 1943, where do you think they would have found themselves? Leavenworth? Alcatraz? With a one-way ticket to deliver first-hand reporting from Tarawa?
I like the way you think.
L
I can’t drive by the WH and fake a close-up look like I could in the 60s.
Take…
Hopefully, this curtails any of the anti-Trump media from their nosy wanderings.
Transparency does not mean the media can go to various meetings or eavesdropping WH internal processes. Many raw opinions or debates shouldn’t be leaked to the public. That’s what happened in Trump 1.0.
Since they are soooo opposed to it, they should be barred for life from attending anything in the ballroom once its done
Ditto what you said. Throw them in prison.
Surreptitiously recording someone is illegal.
Surreptitiously recording a government conversation is treasonous............
Arrest and detention is an Executive Branch function.
I recommend a soundproof and electronic devices-swept cell behind ballistic glass in full view of the entrance to the Oval Office in which the miscreants can see but never hear and thus be subjected to their own self-torture.
“Some reporters have been caught secretly recording video and audio of our offices, along with pictures of sensitive info, without permission”
Ban all reporters from the White House.
Hold the White House press conference outside the White House.
It used to be held outside the main White House building anyway.
Most of he legacy news reporters are vermin and terrorist supporters.
Treat them as such.
Beware the lip readers!
National security is a serious issue. Those who wiretap are being caught.
“Surreptitiously recording someone is illegal.”
Only in 11 states.
“Surreptitiously recording a government conversation is treasonous.”
I don’t know what the law is in DC, since it’s not an actual state. And maybe it’s OK for the press to record under the First Amendment if the topic isn’t classified.
Kick them out of everything except the Press Room.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.