DOJ Deletes Study Showing Domestic Terrorists Are Most Often Right Wing (Barf alert)

404 ^ | September 16th 2025 | EMANUEL MAIBERG

[montag813]

Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives,” the study said. “In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.

Funny, I thought 9/11 happened after 1990.

[Mr. K]

Are they out of their f****** mind? Do they honestly think anybody’s going to believe this?

Hear me out- This Lie Is So blatant it just might backfire on them.

I know the Liberals are going to believe it, and quote this study on TV for days and days and days, but they always do that and have been doing it for decades.

But normal people are seeing through the media lies

[bray]

Did they give actual examples?

[LibertyOh]

I’d like to see the underlying data.

[Fester Chugabrew]

The left has saturated internet sources with sewer level bilge for decades, and people take internet sources more literally and seriously than Sacred Writ.

[rlmorel]

This is a summary of a paper written and published in 2023 by this same turd (bold italics are mine):

TITLE: LINK: “CNN Can Kiss My As $”: A Novel Description of Hyperpartisan US News Consumers

AUTHORS: Andrea Lorenz, Carolyn Schmitt, Shannon McGregor, Daniel Malmer

PUBLISHED: 2023/9/6

DESCRIPTION: News consumption in the United States is polarized and fragmented, with an abundance of partisan news publications appealing to political identities on both the left and the right. Yet, there is an abundance of hyperpartisan news on the right, the content of which has been shown to be harmful to democracy. This study captures one of the most comprehensive pictures to date of the U.S. Americans who consume far-right media and makes connections between such media use and the state of American democracy. After a lengthy data-cleaning process, we analyzed open-ended survey responses from a nationally representative sample of more than 10,000 U.S. American adults, finding that nearly ten percent self-report at least one far-right news outlet as a primary news source. Furthermore, significantly more U.S. Americans report consuming far-right and moderate-right news outlets than counterparts on the left. We then examined the characteristics of this small but significant group, given the current political climate in the United States, finding that far-right news consumers are overwhelmingly white, male, Republican, Christian, and without a college degree. This study reinforces previous findings that patterns in hyperpartisan media usage demonstrate growing extremism in the U.S., and that it is deeply rooted in identity. So. If you don't accept that CNN is a rational, bipartisan purveyor of truth with no bias or agenda, and are angry that they have abdicated the great responsibility that used to come with journalism, then YOU are the problem.

[piasa]

The left plays all kinds of games, I notice they brought up Islamic terrorism but didn’t go into the death and casualty numbers from Islamic terrorism (even if they would they would claim most was not countable because it was “mental illness” rather than ideology.

They also would count 911 as just one attack instead of a series. There is a thousand ways to twist statistics that they employ.

Yet they wouldn’t tell you how many were carried out by men and how many by women because they don’t know or rather don’t want to know the difference.

[ClearCase_guy]

227 events that took more than 520 lives

I cannot think of a single far-right event that would fit here.

[marktwain]

I’d like to see the underlying data.

---

Exactly. One of the “big lies” they use to cook the books is to count left wing fanatics as “right wing”.

Since WWII, the surviving Left has peddled the big lie that Fascism is “right wing”. Both Mussolini and Hitler always said and identified as men of the left. There are no “conservative” totalitarian governments.

[rlmorel]

"...Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives,” the study said. “In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives..."

That is because crimes committed by Leftists and their acolytes are not judged to have any ideology behind them. They are considered to be "random" attacks.

On the other hand, anyone who voted for DONALD TRUMP (or ANY Republican) who commits any kind of crime is assumed to have done it for ideological purposes and rooted in racism.

[SmokingJoe]

One of the fake, made up “studies” from Biden DOJ?
Yup.
Reality:
Almost all domestic terrorists/killers attacks are made by far left lunatics like this Tyler Robinson who just assassinated Charlie Kirk.
Just go look at Chicago, Baltimore, NYC, LA etc, all Democrats strongholds with the highest murder rates in America.

[piasa]

When they do, you typically find that they cherry pick the criminals’ manifestos to find one thing they can label as right wing.

For example, the terrorist can be a freaking member of a socialist group yet be listed as “rightwing” if he is also racist or said something that could be interpretedcthat way.

They can’t tell you who is really right or left than they can define a woman.

[mass55th]

That’s because it’s a bull$hit report.

[Lizavetta]

Right. Because BLM and Antifa are soooo right wing.

[brookwood]

“Funny, I thought 9/11 happened after 1990.”
It matters a lot if you include the 250 killed by Timothy Mcveigh, I think that was 1993. About half the total. they are probably including the Kyle Rittenhouse as a right wing murder, things like that. Pulse night club, oh yeah right wing Islamic terrorist. The Las Vegas killings, a guy who hated country music fans, gotcha, definitely right wing.

[sappy]

Darrell Huff wrote a book.....

[rlmorel]

I went to that website to read more, but it is members only. In researching who "404" is and what they are about, I concluded these are far Leftists. If that article was written in 2023, the Biden DOJ no doubt put it up there not caring a whit if it was accurate or not, but because it buttressed the Biden DOJ provably false assertion that White Supremacy was the greatest threat to this Republic.

The Trump DOJ likely took a look at it and just threw it in the trash, as it completely should have been. These people at "404" are angry about that.

I was fully prepared to learn they were taking government funds from the likes of USAID, but could find no evidence of that.

Read the transcript at this LINK: What is the connection between technology and democratic backsliding?

The "Transcript" can be found just above the writer credits at the bottom.

Perhaps I misread this, but these scumbags are not friends of the Constitution. If I read this incorrectly, feel free to let me know.

[rktman]

Don’t mess with our creds.

[bankwalker]

I think they included muzzies as right wing.