Posted on 07/29/2025 10:26:22 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Tommy Robinson is understood to have left the country following an alleged assault at St Pancras station in which a man suffered serious injuries.
The 42-year-old far-Right activist from Luton was filmed at the scene of the incident on Monday evening and British Transport Police (BTP) later said they were making “arrest enquiries”.
But in an update on Tuesday, the force said a suspect wanted for questioning in connection with the alleged attack had boarded a flight in the early hours and was no longer in the UK.
The incident, in which a man was allegedly assaulted, occurred at St Pancras at around 8.40pm.
Footage posted on social media appeared to show Robinson at the scene looking agitated while a man lies on the floor.
In the clip, Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, can be heard saying: “He f-----g come at me. He come at me bruv.”
As two members of station staff attend to the man, Robinson approaches an apparent witness and adds: “He come at me bruv, you saw that.”
A spokesman for the BTP confirmed that a man had suffered serious injuries as a result of an alleged assault and had been taken to hospital.
They appealed for anyone who may have witnessed the incident to contact them.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
“Far right”… the favored declaration of committed leftists.
Tommy’s assailant was probably sent by the Deep State.
President Trump should instruct our ambassadors via Secretary Rubio to offer him political asylum.
I can’t imagine why Robinson might be skeptical about getting a fair hearing within the British legal system.
Not giving “The Telegraph” the clicks to find out, but I am betting that, even though there are surveillance cameras everywhere, they are not showing what was done to Tommy prior to his striking the attacker.
At some point, a man can only do so much. I wouldn’t blame him if he went and got asylum in another country. Might as well enjoy your life eventually.
You are so right, since they have been so fair with him so far.
There was an article in the Daily Mail regarding this incident, and in the comments section I remarked that the assailant was probably a government plant. That comment was deleted. The British media is in cahoots with the government.
Why do they always, without fail, have to include “whose real name is Steven Yaxley-Lennon” in any article about him?
Rhetorical question. We already know why the socialists do it.
Why do they do it?
AI can make any video you can think of, and some you can’t.
He legally changed his name and now his real name in Tommy Robinson.
So the aftermath is on camera, but the incident wasn’t?
That’s the impression I’m getting from the limited information from these articles.
I feel like if he was attached, there should be evidence of it.
I’m not saying that he would still get a fair hearing in London. I don’t blame him for that fear.
attacked*
When Jesus encountered evil, he fled.
Staying around evil or those that despise you is a very bad idea.
Tommy, come to the USA!
The media attention on Tommy Robinson is purposeful and relentless. His face is known everywhere.
There are a large portion of enraged, rabid leftists, particularly in London, who will attack Tommy Robinson on sight.
To imply that “Tommy Robinson” is a criminal alias used by a con man, of course.
A HARD RIGHT con man at that.
Never mind that, after ten years of constant repetition, the whole flippin’ WORLD already knows that his legal name is Steven Yaxley-Lennon.
I think any news article referring to someone who uses a pseudonym would also indicate his real name. It’s just proper form.
I didn’t know he changed it legally.
So they should be saying “whose birth name was” instead of “whose real name is.”
But that would be deadnaming, right? A capital offense if they did that to a tranny...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.