Posted on 07/25/2025 5:17:16 PM PDT by henbane
Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell handed authorities documentation alleging that at least “100 different people” were within the late pedophile’s orbit, a bombshell disclosure that comes after two meetings with a top official from the U.S. Justice Department.
The disclosure aligns with concerns expressed by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and others that figures in the periphery of Epstein’s abuse may become ensnared if the government releases tranches of new documents in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at trendingpoliticsnews.com ...
There is nothing she can say that I will believe without documentation or some kind of corroboration. She could say Clinton raped 1000 girls and I would want to see some additional info . She could say anything to try to get out of jail.
Well, if she said Hillary is a nut job I would believe that,🤪
Said the suspicious guy who is automatically in TDS mode.
‘ Said the suspicious guy who is automatically in TDS mode.’
So you do understand that blind loyalty or disgust can cloud one’s judgment.
Excellent.
Then deal with the points being made.
1) Spending with no restraint.
2) Information and the control of that information.
If she can’t point to some physical evidence, it is not going anywhere. If she has some evidence stashed, something might happen but they will probably kill her.
Limited immunity carries over to congressional testimony.
Should Bank of America be made to explain why they didn’t send the two SARS until after Epstein was dead documenting 170 million of suspicious activity
Sure, but presidential pardons carry over even better.
At this point, you have nothing to defend. You've been pardoned.
Show up or get charged with contempt of congress.
Refuse to answer questions? Contempt and obstruction.
Lie? Good luck.
The DOJ really hasn't been cleaned out yet. Trump trusts few people there. And Trump especially doesn't trust the SDNY,
Trump does trust Blanche. So Trump sends Blanche.
Trust him to do what?
Articles says over 100, not exactly 100.
Yes they should.
And they should also explain why they debank conservatives.
The worst offenders should absolutely be prosecuted if that is possible.
You can't think of an answer to that?
Try.
‘ You can’t think of an answer to that?’
I can speculate sure.
‘Try’
Can you?
I asked you first btw.
Names of a hundred democrat ‘elites’ will be a fun surprise for MSNBC, the Washington Post and New York Times.... They wanted the story - they’re gonna get the story.
Maybe a hundred names of democrat ‘elites’ is just the start.
As he should.
“she knew some of those were getting killed?”?
Several years ago I read an entire book by a lawyer who fought for a legal case for one of the teen victims. I don’t remember any mention of people being killed in that book. What is your information about that statement?
Unreal. We ask for names... she throws a few names around. The important ones get protected, and just watch, she’ll get a pardon or commutation.
That skank was the leader of the Epstein spy ring for Mossad. Epstein was a nobody. She showed up with all the cash and connections to billionaires and Mossad.
Unreal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.