Posted on 07/25/2025 5:17:16 PM PDT by henbane
Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell handed authorities documentation alleging that at least “100 different people” were within the late pedophile’s orbit, a bombshell disclosure that comes after two meetings with a top official from the U.S. Justice Department.
The disclosure aligns with concerns expressed by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and others that figures in the periphery of Epstein’s abuse may become ensnared if the government releases tranches of new documents in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at trendingpoliticsnews.com ...
“It means she gave names of people who were in Epstein’s orbit in some fashion.”
She did not.
Did she cough up names that weren’t asked about first??? We don’t know. Maybe. We do know she was asked about 100 different people by the DOJ.
She can start with fellow co worker Bessent who is in charge of the Treasury
[[I challenge anyone to “remember” a hundred names.]]
well, there’s me, then my father, then his father, then his father’s father’ his father’s father’s farther, his... bah, i give up”
Yes. There are REDACTED FBI reports. Go ahead and release pages with NO NAMES if it feels good. If you release a list of names and insinuate that they diddled young girls with no proof you would want to have billions of dollars on hand to settle the lawsuits.
So... 100. Not 99, not 101... An even 100 names. Very impressive... And very unbelievable.
Looks like the DOJ is casting a wide net with the help of Maxwell.
Once the list is complete from the point-of-view of the DOJ, the serious interviews will occur with the selected members of the "catch."
This list should ultimately lead to the revelation of the actual perps.
‘ He currently is NOT trump’s lawyer. He’s DOJ attorney.’
He is deputy AG, a lawyer yes, but that position isn’t one that handles individual cases. This has no precedent and the fact he was Trump’s personal attorney should raise suspicions of something coverup like.
The Epstein Victims Compensation Fund was established by Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and received approximately 225 applications from alleged victims. The fund was set up after Epstein’s death to compensate victims of Epstein’s sexual abuse and trafficking.
Of these individuals 138 accepted payouts totaling approximately $125 million.
It doesn’t say she gave them info on over 100 people they asked about. But there was no client list. /sarc
What do you have to say about this article by CBS
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/to-former-prosecutors-everything-about-the-justice-dept-interview-with-ghislaine-maxwell-looked-unorthodox/
“If Blanche was meeting with Maxwell alone, that’s obscene malpractice,” another former federal prosecutor, who had decades of experience, told CBS News. “He can’t testify and become a witness, nor can he write a report of their meeting.”
I ran into this exact issue when it came to forensic accounting.
“Prosecutors are not permitted to write up interview reports and are not sworn law enforcement officers with training to document an interview of this kind.”
If you want to break with longstanding tradition make sure it makes sense and there is protection.
Nothing makes sense in this entire fiasco.
Unless you look at it as a coverup that wasn’t thought through.
Can you elaborate a bit on this extraordinary charge?
No way you commute her sentence unless she gives up the whole pie and there’s arrests. Screw that.
Plus, she goes free we have to remember Epstein wasn’t free and he...killed himself.
What kind of woman is she to at best have turned the other way with the trafficking and peod/rape while she knew some of those were getting killed?
What of the high level people? Would she testify against them?
Giving up names? She had a 100 names just like that?
I think it is a coverup that it being bungled left and right.
I just don’t know what kind of coverup.
trump still hasn’t learned about the Streisand effect
I am still going with covering up for CIA or Mossad type scenario. Possible Access Agent
Define in his orbit
How did Ghislaine Maxwell have documents to hand over while incarcerated? Seems more likely that the feds brought her documents to comment upon, in general and against a list of questions about criminal behavior. What she comes up with likely determines “where it goes from here” — and hat might be nowhere.
The notion that 100, or a thousand “names” were in Epstein’s orbit means doodle by itself. I wish reporters could wait until they had a story before telling one.
How did the CIA and FBI not have at least that much information. Is this a ruse to get around Blondi having claimed there was no list, they had no info?
‘ Can you elaborate a bit on this extraordinary charge?’
It’s not a charge.
It’s an observation of what’s going on.
It’s suspicious as hell if you’re paying attention and aren’t automatically in maga defense mode.
‘ I think it is a coverup that it being bungled left and right.’
Ok. Then you’re looking at this more clearly than most here.
‘I just don’t know what kind of coverup.’
And that’s why transparency is paramount.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.