Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files
WSJ ^ | 07 23 2025 | Sadie Gurman and others

Posted on 07/23/2025 12:55:22 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

(Sub-headline: Bondi also told president at the meeting that Justice decided to not release more Jeffrey Epstein documents because of the presence of child pornography and the need to protect victims)

When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aclownpost; alexleary; annielinskey; bankruptthem; christophersteele; destroythewsj; enemycombatants; enemyjournalists; epstein; garbage; joshdawsey; makebelieve; sadiegurman; targetwsjtraitors; trump; wsj; wsjsedition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: madison10

The WSJ is recycling old news. Unfortunately the files that were released a few months ago, most people didnt even bother READING THEM..yes, Trumps name appears multiple times, I saw it myself, it was in flight logs. Go back and look so yes, his name IS in the files, in flight logs. In fact I was surprised when the files were released that they allowed Trump’s name to be revealed in it I thought to myself “WOW they are transparent, there is Trump’s name and they are cool with it”


21 posted on 07/23/2025 1:09:47 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Jamie Dimon, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell. Etc. etc. etc.


22 posted on 07/23/2025 1:10:19 PM PDT by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Even more mundane then that.

Remember when that article came out several years back about Epstein’s contact list. It was huge.
They included everyone he tried to reach out to, and while his motives may have been nefarious, often times they were just reaching out and established contacts with people’s secretary or their agents. I think Trump may have been one of them.

It doesn’t mean Trump hung out with Epstein or flew to his island.


23 posted on 07/23/2025 1:11:20 PM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

I’m surprised I’m not on the list. I feel left out.


24 posted on 07/23/2025 1:11:20 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
The WSJ doesn’t seem to concerned about Trump’s lawsuit.

Of course WSJ isn't worried. It's already been confirmed that Trump was in the flight logs.

The scam is that the WSJ wants you to think it's something else, something new. It keeps the story alive, and the easily lead, duped.

25 posted on 07/23/2025 1:12:55 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

The Shrill ... same as WSUrinal.


26 posted on 07/23/2025 1:13:16 PM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

To be fair, MNJohnnie - avoiding an opportunity to pin Trump down over Epstein could have been a case of “mutually assured destruction” - in that as many Democrat allies and interests are at stake too.


27 posted on 07/23/2025 1:14:03 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

+ 1,000


28 posted on 07/23/2025 1:14:15 PM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I think it’s obvious this is what happened, given Trump’s behavior the last few months

Also think the reason Biden etc never said anything is because it’s a “mutually assured destruction” situation with both Clintons and Trump and lots of others


29 posted on 07/23/2025 1:14:57 PM PDT by Nomad577
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

“Really think for once. Biden’s DOJ did everything it could to jail the President. Really think they would not of used this Epstein silver bullet, if it existed, to end his 2024 campaign?”

You should really really do the permutations in your mind.If they did a Russian Hoax why didn’t they do an Epstein hoax? After all, Trump spent many years in Epstein’s orbit.

And IF Trump is implicated, and I believe he is, why didn’t they use it?? Hoax or not. Think hard on that.

Implication doesn’t mean the conclusion is correct. It is just an implication.

Why didn’t they use it??????


30 posted on 07/23/2025 1:15:18 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Murdoch is Satan’s brother.

At least he looks like Satan’s brother if Satan had a brother.


31 posted on 07/23/2025 1:16:37 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"Biden’s DOJ did everything it could to jail the President. Really think they would not of used this Epstein silver bullet, if it existed, to end his 2024 campaign?"

I agree but it looks like someone is working overtime to this revitalized this effort to 'get Trump'. Who is feeding the WSJ these stories and why now?

32 posted on 07/23/2025 1:16:54 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nomad577

Yeah cause Biden was hell bent on protecting Trump at all costs LOL. Trump is in the files, they were released a few months ago, I saw his name over and over again, but they were in flight logs but actual “files” but I guess in a way yes, Trump IS in the files since his name does appear numerous times


33 posted on 07/23/2025 1:17:27 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

… “ according to senior administration officials. “ …
Well then, wsj impeccable source strikes again


34 posted on 07/23/2025 1:18:28 PM PDT by daku
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nomad577
Also think the reason Biden etc never said anything is because it’s a “mutually assured destruction” situation with both Clintons and Trump and lots of others.

^

35 posted on 07/23/2025 1:19:49 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

DOJ should find out out who’s getting paid to propagandize at the WSJ and by whom. Whoever it is, it’s worth it to them post BS, get sued and lose.


36 posted on 07/23/2025 1:20:19 PM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

An example of whats in “ the files” from depositions released of 2 Witness interviews

Pope John Paul II is “ in the files”

https://nypost.com/2024/01/04/news/all-the-a-listers-named-in-the-new-jeffrey-epstein-documents/


37 posted on 07/23/2025 1:21:18 PM PDT by silverleaf (“Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out” —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Exactly. And since his name is supposedly on the list today when it wasn’t back then, means the evidence has been corrupted.

It is why PDJT wants as much of the sealed/uncorrupted Grand Jury info released as soon as possible.


38 posted on 07/23/2025 1:21:31 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Don’t bother with a WSJ account iT’s like the National Enquirer gossip listings.


39 posted on 07/23/2025 1:21:46 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daku

This is why Trump should have released EVERYTHING and let the chips fall where they may. By doing what he did it makes people wonder what he’s hiding, Just release it ALL and be done with it


40 posted on 07/23/2025 1:21:50 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson