Posted on 07/02/2025 9:03:00 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
It was a surprising statement from Attorney General Pam Bondi as the Trump administration promises to release more files from its sex trafficking investigation of Jeffrey Epstein: The FBI, she said, was reviewing “tens of thousands of videos” of the wealthy financier “with children or child porn.”
The comment, made to reporters at the White House days after a similar remark to a stranger with a hidden camera, raised the stakes for President Donald Trump’s administration to prove it has in its possession previously unseen compelling evidence. That task is all the more pressing after an earlier document dump that Bondi hyped angered elements of Trump’s base by failing to deliver new bombshells and as administration officials who had promised to unlock supposed secrets of the so-called government “deep state” struggle to fulfill that pledge.
Yet weeks after Bondi’s remarks, it remains unclear what she was referring to.
The Associated Press spoke with lawyers and law enforcement officials in criminal cases of Epstein and socialite former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell who said they hadn’t seen and didn’t know of a trove of recordings like what Bondi described. Indictments and detention memos do not reference the existence of videos of Epstein with children, and neither was charged with possession of child sex abuse material even though that offense would have been much easier to prove than the sex trafficking counts they faced.
SNIP
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
The Bondi experience has been real, but can we now have a serious AG?
Thousands, but not for us peons.
Ms Bondi, regarding videos, what of the Sean Combs videos that were seized by the government ? What’s going on there , anything criminal ? If not, Combs will get his tapes back ?
I imagine from a legal and prosecutorial perspective (if not a political one also) every video must be reviewed.
The FBI could organize and train dozens of agents for the job, and it might still take a year or more to look at everything.
America’s state-security apparatus does not just “release stuff,” without knowing what’s in it - despite whatever political promises were made. This is also especially true when they are leaking info for outright political reasons.
Jeff Sessions 2.0
The faces of any of the girls will be blurred...so you won’t know if they’re 12 or 40...
But people didn't believe it. So she immediately said she had tens of thousands of videos that had to be examined. It was a vast number and people did expect some information to be released to the public about the contents.
But we get nothing. I think we are expected to lose interest and just stop pestering the DOJ. Let it all fade into the shadows because, I guess, no one cares.
It's infuriating.
Any small town detective with video of a local baby-rapist at work would have the scum in cuffs in days.
Her claim that arrest delays are due to the fact that thousands of “premiere” agents at the “world’s elite law enforcement agency” have thousands of videos to sift through is filled with multiple LIES.
Only arrests matter.
ONLY ARRESTS!
The point is whom were the perps, not the victims. The longer time moves forward, the less likelihood, if there were any, that these creeps will be put in prison.
None of them will ever go to prison....statute of limitations...And if a sitting President can lie to the American Public about Monica...and no one has any shame about it...what do you think is going to happen.
I think that the only reason she mentioned the videos is because she slipped up. And now the continued cover up will go on for infinity.
Suppose the Epstein files implicate 60% of Congress on both sides of the isle? What would you do?
Why would anyone involved in this be deserving of protection?
I’d like to see Tom Hanks and others perp walked.
You know, they could put up a website, and each day as a video(s) are cleared, they could post them. That would go a long way towards proving that they’re actually doing something.
Are you advocating for public release of identifiable images of 12 year olds?
Let the chips fall where they may.
AG Barbie has been the ultimate tease for six+ months. Don’t women’s reputations suffer when they’re known as teases?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.