Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Ends Abuse of Injunctions: No More ‘Judicial Supremacy’
Breitbart ^ | 6/27/25 | Joel Pollak

Posted on 06/27/2025 8:26:53 AM PDT by DallasBiff

There were several concurring opinions, and a dissent joined by the Court’s three liberal justices, including a separate dissent by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has become the Court’s resident left-wing activist.

Jackson wrote:”The Court’s decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law.” She derided the Court’s cited precedents in common law at the Founding as “inapt comparisons to impotent English tribunals.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amyconeybarrett; demagogicparty; ketanibrown; ketanji; ketanjibrownjackson; lawfare; maga; originalism; scotus; twitter; x
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Oh gawd, the above is from a person who does not know the difference between a man and a woman in a Senate hearing confirmation.

Well SCOTUS judge Ketanji, a basic biology lesson, men have a penis and testicles, women have a vagina.

1 posted on 06/27/2025 8:26:53 AM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
"...an existential threat to the rule of law"

That's rich. Eight HUNDRED judges each assuming he or she is POTUS is NOT an existential threat to the nation's survival?

2 posted on 06/27/2025 8:30:04 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

“inapt comparisons to impotent English tribunals.” writes the clerk for the gender-confused DEI-product judge.
She continues, “ ... by dead white men, as they should be.”

Judges are appointed, not elected. We voted for border security.


3 posted on 06/27/2025 8:30:28 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

So much for ACB drifting left or being weak. She took Jackson to the woodshed with some of the harshest language I can recall one justice using on another.


4 posted on 06/27/2025 8:31:02 AM PDT by GrootheWanderer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Let’s give Amy Comey Barrett some recognition for doing the right thing when it counts most. This is a big one. Trump gets to flood the zone, now.


5 posted on 06/27/2025 8:31:49 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

or they


6 posted on 06/27/2025 8:31:51 AM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

The courts must also be checked and balanced, if we are to have a system of checks and balances.


7 posted on 06/27/2025 8:31:56 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Image
8 posted on 06/27/2025 8:35:04 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GrootheWanderer

A bit catty.

“We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”

I believe proper form would be to refer to the DISSENT, and not to justices by name. But it’s been a long time since I read Supreme Court decisions.


9 posted on 06/27/2025 8:35:22 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
Wow, what a slap-down! Justice Amy Coney Barrett dismissed Jackson’s dissent sternly:
“We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”
Way to go, ACB!!
10 posted on 06/27/2025 8:36:17 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
I've been as harsh a critic of ACB as many others here, but yes, I give her major kudos on this ruling.

Now, will someone please inform rogue judges of this and make them stop issuing injuntions against Trump!!!!!

11 posted on 06/27/2025 8:37:51 AM PDT by ducttape45 (Jeremiah 17:9, "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

When one reads Mrs Potato Head’s opinions, think what another 4 years of Biden or Harris would have brought. More of her types.

She is emblematic of their judicial philosophy


12 posted on 06/27/2025 8:39:02 AM PDT by llevrok (Keep buggering on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It’s a certainty she pondered long whether to call out Jackson by name. ACB knew perfectly well how hard-hitting it would be to call out another justice by name. And her dismissive “We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument”! Wow. She’s saying, somewhat politely, that her argument is so inept as to not warrant a minute of the other justices’ time.

I don’t see it as catty at all. It’s a powerful way to take a firm stand.


13 posted on 06/27/2025 8:40:17 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I expect the leftist District Courts will simply and quickly manufacture and approve Class Actions. I am skeptical that this will move the needle of Lawfare very much - sure hope I’m wrong.


14 posted on 06/27/2025 8:40:28 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Bingo


15 posted on 06/27/2025 8:40:53 AM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

The fact we even had to go this far astounds me. Has American become completely ignorant? There is one reason why the courts are known as Circuit Courts or District Courts. Can you guess?

If not, I am sure it is related to judgments being fenced in within the definition of the area served by each court.

Only the SCOTUS has nationwide ramifications!!!


16 posted on 06/27/2025 8:42:18 AM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I think it was a purposeful rebuke. Keep in mind Jackson has very recently been out trashing her colleagues in public.


17 posted on 06/27/2025 8:44:29 AM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I am relieved that ACB got a big decision correct.


18 posted on 06/27/2025 8:45:43 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Can I hear a very large, enthusiastic “A-MEN”?


19 posted on 06/27/2025 8:46:43 AM PDT by _longranger81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrootheWanderer
She took Jackson to the woodshed with some of the harshest language I can recall one justice using on another.

I was hoping she'd end the slapdown with "bitch!"

20 posted on 06/27/2025 8:47:52 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson