Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
AP News ^ | 12 June 2025 | LOLITA C. BALDOR and TARA COPP

Posted on 06/12/2025 2:51:58 PM PDT by tkocur

WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions at a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations.

Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief.

In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has developed plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary.

“Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,” Hegseth said several times.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: duh; foxnewsweekendhost; greenland; hegseth; secdef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: tkocur

“Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,”

Hegseth says US has plans to invade Greenland.

Talk about twisted, distorted out of context sensationalist reporting.


41 posted on 06/12/2025 4:16:16 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkocur

We have schools for war planners. What do those trainee war planners do for homework? They write war plans. What do the do when they graduate and get offices in the Pentagon? They make more war plans and update the old ones (hmm, do we need quite as many musket ball molds for our invasion of Canada?).


42 posted on 06/12/2025 4:23:55 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (I refuse to call the left "progressive" because I do not see slavery to the government as progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkocur

Can Denmark defend Greenland if China decides to attack them?
If not, then Greenland needs to pay us for defense or become a US territory.


43 posted on 06/12/2025 4:58:19 PM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo; Romulus
Glad he doesn’t listen to people who don’t have a clue.

Zactly.

44 posted on 06/12/2025 5:00:24 PM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (⭐⭐To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Violence⭐⭐)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
It appears that you have never read his The Art of The Deal
45 posted on 06/12/2025 5:01:21 PM PDT by arthurus (covfefe )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tkocur

How about to invade Chicago?


46 posted on 06/12/2025 5:19:15 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc maverick

I really don’t see China attacking Greenland.


47 posted on 06/12/2025 5:19:34 PM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tkocur
“Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,” Hegseth said several times.

That's a generic answer that does not necessarily have anything to do with Greenland. That said, I wager that the Pentagon has plans to invade most places. That's what joint area commands do.

48 posted on 06/12/2025 5:20:39 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkocur

Help me out here: Don’t we already have bases there? Why is that not enough?


49 posted on 06/12/2025 6:53:08 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

Yeah like why is gas is 3.69 a gallon :(


50 posted on 06/12/2025 7:06:21 PM PDT by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tkocur
They *should* have a contingency plan for every imaginable scenario. Always.

51 posted on 06/12/2025 8:11:30 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkocur

Pentagon may need plans to invade LA.


52 posted on 06/12/2025 8:18:00 PM PDT by Chgogal (Voting Democrat is suicidal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

We already have a military presence there that probably far outclasses whatever Denmark has there


No. There is just a handful of USAF people running a smallish station in the North.

But several platoons should be enough, with 2 helicopters and one fighter jet just to be sure.


53 posted on 06/13/2025 5:50:04 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PIF

My bet The Pentagon has plans to invade and take over many lands from Canada to Mexico even England.


54 posted on 06/13/2025 6:06:32 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (. War is Hell, War IS a Crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson