Posted on 03/23/2025 8:55:16 AM PDT by Rummyfan
The radical Left's latest scheme to derail President Trump's America First agenda has reached a fever pitch, with over 100 frivolous lawsuits filed against his administration since January. But Trump isn't taking their lawfare lying down.
In a bold move that should have Democrats and their army of activist attorneys panicking, Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate anti-Trump lawyers and law firms attempting to hamstring his presidency through baseless litigation. The timing couldn't be more critical, with an unprecedented 15 injunctions slapped against presidential actions just last month—far more than Obama or Biden ever faced.
The Left's desperation is palpable. After losing the Oval Office, the House, and the Senate in November, they're resorting to their favorite tactic: shopping for activist judges to block crucial executive actions. We've seen this circus play out with injunctions against Trump's birthright citizenship executive order and his use of wartime powers to deport Venezuelan gang members terrorizing American communities.
“Lawyers and law firms that engage in actions that violate the laws of the United States or rules governing attorney conduct must be efficiently and effectively held accountable,” Trump declared in a memorandum released Saturday. “Accountability is especially important when misconduct by lawyers and law firms threatens our national security, homeland security, public safety, or election integrity.”
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
The three branches of the federal government, are not equals in power and authority.
They are built on foundations that are separate.
The Judicial Branch has failed to remain on its foundation; its Big Ego “thinks” that it can grab territory on the Executive Branch foundation.
The Executive Branch can BAN THE JUDGES.
What’s not mentioned is that a lot of top law firms refuse to have Trump as a client because of politics.
"Progressive" (unlimited gov't-loving) lawyers who hate constitutional limitations.
Nothing wrong with being "activist". Would that more Patriots were "activist".
Indeed! The unelected black robed activist lefty liberals think they can overrule nationwide duly elected president.
The constitution clearly states that the president will have the sole executive powers to run the country. Having got their butts kicked, democrats are resorting to unconstitutional actions through the activist judges. Those judges deserve prison time for floating the constitution.
chuck e. schumer told us all how the democrats in CONgress set up a picket fence of judges to stop Trump. I hate pickets fences!
Enough with the hyperbole. He's done next to nothing, except complain, like he did his first failed term. Western Civilization is at stake.
Follow Wayne Allen Root's advice, and get the dirt on ALL the judges. Then make an address on national prime time TV outlining the trail of corruption. make it clear to the masses of asses what is happening. Fire all of them or call for CONgress to impeach and convict them, or publicly side with the corruption.
RICO involving all these “justices”
You need to find out where their funding is coming from or was it put aside for just this
“In a bold move that should have Democrats and their army of activist attorneys panicking, Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate anti-Trump lawyers...”
That’s what this guy calls “going nuclear”!?
It’s not even a dud hand granade!
Pronto.
And I bet if you follow the money trail these lawyers are being funded with taxpayer money.
Disbarred and prosecute.
Here is a Twitchy thread listing the various D.C. law firms and their involvement in the lawfare against Trump and conservatives.
“Lawfare EXTRAORDINAIRE! Deet-Filled Thread Calls OUT Dirty, Woke, Leftist Law Firms Running D.C. and WOW”
https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/03/23/meet-the-law-firms-that-run-dc-thread-n2410308
There are, as well, organizations specifically formed around lawfare, such as the ACLU and SPLC and more environmental radicals than you can shake a gavel at. At least with them you know what you're getting.
POLITICAL FRONT –
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the quiet part out loud this week on PBS, admitting that the Democrats intentionally stacked the courts with 235 progressive judges to stop President Donald Trump. It’s no surprise that since Trump took office this year, he’s been bombarded with an all-out legal assault from the weaponized judicial branch plagued with radical leftists.
“The good news here is, we did put 235 judges—progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump—last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.”
“We hope that the appellate courts, when it gets up there in the Supreme Court, will uphold those rulings. They restored the money to NIH. They required that 8,000 federal employees have to come back.”
Schumer’s remarks basically validate Trump’s argument about the weaponized judiciary. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) took to X immediately after Schumer’s admission, writing: “‘Progressive judges’ That doesn’t mean ‘judges who follow the law.’ It means progressive activists wearing black robes.”
https://wokespy.com/chuck-schumer-admits-on-live-tv-dems-stacked-court-to-undermine-trump/
Follow the money.
“Lawyers and law firms that engage in actions that violate the laws of the United States or rules governing attorney conduct must be efficiently and effectively held accountable,”
So simple but it took this long to say. The Left are creating the “constitutional crisis “ and now Trump is apparently doing something about it.
The thing is though that the Left are that tempest tossed sea that is eternally angry and can never know Peace. In short, they will not cannot back off and bide their time. They MUST react. They must retaliate. See the tagline.
and here comes a judge ,LOL
We need to shut this circus down
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.