Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's not that Trump doesn't care about markets. He just cares about tariffs more.
Yahoo Finance ^ | March 12, 2025 | Ben Werschkul

Posted on 03/12/2025 8:48:11 AM PDT by lasereye

Investors are trying to make sense of President Trump's willingness to shrug off market losses in recent days.

A review of the president's commentary suggests perhaps a simple answer: He just cares more about tariffs during his second go-around in the White House so far.

"Markets are going to go up, and they're going to go down, but you know what: We have to rebuild our country," he said Tuesday afternoon in a trade-focused refrain that the president has sharpened in recent days even as market pressure has mounted.

And the economic fallout is clearly in evidence with markets in correction territory, a trade war breaking out on multiple fronts, Wall Street increasingly worried about stagflation, and Trump being peppered with questions on the topic at nearly every public appearance in recent days.

Trump has pivoted on plenty of tariff specifics — including a proposed 50% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum that lasted less than 8 hours on Tuesday — but the longtime "tariff man" has remained remarkably consistent about what he sees as his ultimate goal of significant long-term tariff revenues and a reorientation of the US trading system.

It's a tariff-first focus that is perhaps not surprising to observers of Trump who saw him prioritize tariffs above all else at nearly every campaign stop in 2024. But it clearly represents a whiplash for traders who expected the president to pivot quickly once in office in deference to the markets (as he often did during his first term).

This time around, Trump is clearly choosing tariffs so far, with markets repeatedly underestimating his pain tolerance.

In his first 50 or so days in office Trump has already enacted a tariff agenda that will dwarf the economic impact of his first term if it's simply left in place.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: stockmarket; tariffs; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
I'm not sure how this will all play out. Regardless, Trump should be credited for taking a long view.
1 posted on 03/12/2025 8:48:11 AM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lasereye

I think that it might be he’s looking at Tariffs as another way to do what Volker did in the 80s with interest rates to tame inflation.

He sees increased tariffs as a way to address inflation in a targeted manner rather than across the board.

The difference is that rather than impacting 100% of everyone with interest rates, it will only impact those that buy foreign goods.

There will still be some pain - as in the early 80s, but in a short period of time things will pick back up with a vengence.


2 posted on 03/12/2025 8:51:01 AM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Business leaders often don't see beyond the next quarter. President Trump is looking beyond the next decade.

-PJ

3 posted on 03/12/2025 8:51:27 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

” Trump should be credited for taking a long view.”

Exactly right. The author seems to think the president should change his policies based on the DJIA and QQQ closing prices every afternoon.

You have to laugh — the traders thought was just blowing smoke about tariffs during his campaign and would abandon them as soon as he was inaugurated. The exemplifies how smart the traders are.


4 posted on 03/12/2025 8:52:02 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (Democrats who say ‘no one is above the law’ won’t mind going to prison for the money they stole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

At least the guy who can’t think said something.


5 posted on 03/12/2025 8:52:34 AM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Wall Street is basically a version of sports betting.


6 posted on 03/12/2025 8:55:18 AM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
I'm not sure how this will all play out. Regardless, Trump should be credited for taking a long view.

He can't fix 50 years of treachery in a day.

7 posted on 03/12/2025 8:55:34 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

It might be that this was always the plan, to focus more on tariffs in the second term. He hoped to have the first term to stabilize the country.


8 posted on 03/12/2025 8:57:09 AM PDT by wizardoz (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

“He sees increased tariffs as a way to address inflation in a targeted manner rather than across the board.”

It is not about inflation. It is about US business and security.


9 posted on 03/12/2025 9:11:12 AM PDT by TexasGator (1 .I1.11.'1I1.I'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Short term losses will soon become long term gains. It is time to reward those who want to get inflation under control. The Stock Market relies on inflation and is rewarded thusly. They don’t like a correction, but it is badly needed.


10 posted on 03/12/2025 9:11:34 AM PDT by richardtavor ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Yeah, things like Honda building the next-generation Civic in Indiana rather than Mexico won’t have an impact for a couple of years but for that factory and its surrounding areas, that will be huge.

Multiply that by multiple areas and multiple industries, and the Golden Age that PDJT talks about can become a reality.


11 posted on 03/12/2025 9:13:08 AM PDT by pburiak (You really think we can vote our way out of this? That's so cute...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

“Wall Street is basically a version of sports betting.”

ROTFLMAO!

If you are not a total moron or a greedy sob, see stock market can provide you a very nice nest egg.


12 posted on 03/12/2025 9:13:25 AM PDT by TexasGator (1 .I1.11.'1I1.I'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

I’ve been reading a lot of analysts saying the same thing. This is about interest rates and inflation as well.


13 posted on 03/12/2025 9:13:33 AM PDT by okkev68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

The market made bets and took positions that Biden or Harris would win and, they chose poorly. They bet on China, Europe and a stifling WEF superstate moving peon slaves around the world. I am glad they are losing their shorts.


14 posted on 03/12/2025 9:15:17 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

You are correct that some only see next quarter’s profits. “Hey, if we make it in China we’ll make more money!”

However we must re-shore a lot of our industry if the thirty some odd trillion is to be payed back.

To me it’s amazing that people didn’t expect the day would come when our debt had to be addressed.

It’s as if everyone forgot what Ross Perot was harping on a THIRD OF A CENTURY AGO.


15 posted on 03/12/2025 9:15:35 AM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

I wish many on this forum would take a long view, because growing our economy enough to begin chipping away at trillions of dollars of debt is going to require just that.

I get that people don’t want their investments to be harmed, but if we are to succeed, there will be phases where investments are harmed.


16 posted on 03/12/2025 9:19:35 AM PDT by rlmorel ("A people that elect corrupt politicians are not victims...but accomplices." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

My comment to the article:

Apparently history is a forgotten subject. The use of tariffs have been a part of American history since the earliest days of the Republic. The use of tariffs encourages and protects domestic manufacturing which by consequence promotes a stable and prosperous middle-class. In recent years the middle/working class has suffered as manufacturing has moved off-shore. With the world becoming increasingly dangerous, with threats from foreign countries, our ability to manufacture goods is becoming a National Security concern.

The use of tariffs is a historically dependable tool to rebuild our manufacturing base “and” the middle-working classes. The Author, globalist manufacturers and their investors do not care about the long-term sustainability of the markets they claim to be defending. They only care about their short-term profits while long-term profits be damned...


17 posted on 03/12/2025 9:22:14 AM PDT by MichaelRDanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

They are mad because now they have to rethink selling out their US employees.

Everybody makes it sound the markets are crashing like the depression. I am not saying it’s doing well, but we are still ahead of last summers DOW. Considering the benefits we will see with Uncle Don’s tariffs, I am good.


18 posted on 03/12/2025 9:32:56 AM PDT by dgbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Interesting. We can shut down the whole economy over a flu, for a year at least. But now when thinking about a tariff, everyone is deeply concerned about the US economy.


19 posted on 03/12/2025 9:36:48 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Kids trading minute to minute and day to day on their phones hardest hit. They’ve never seen a real drop. Dollar cost averaging has gotten me through the various crashes.


20 posted on 03/12/2025 9:36:52 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters (You can't remove RINOs by voting for them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson