Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Nancy Pelosi Sell Nvidia Stock Weeks Before Price Drop? What Records Show
Newsweek ^ | 1/29 | Robert Thorpe

Posted on 01/28/2025 5:08:52 PM PST by nickcarraway

Recent financial disclosures have reignited the conversation about stock trading by lawmakers, particularly surrounding former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's public disclosures regarding Nvidia stock transactions.

Why It Matters

Nvidia, known as one of the best tech stocks, recently experienced a significant drop, losing over 15 percent of its value in a single day. This decline, resulting in more than $500 billion reduction in market capitalization was one of the largest single-day losses in stock market history and triggered by concerns about competition from the Chinese AI startup DeepSeek.

Pelosi's disclosures regarding a sale of Nvidia stock—a major player among AI stocks—just weeks before its price drop has sparked questions about timing and transparency.

The financial decisions made by lawmakers and their families could influence public trust and reveal possible conflicts of interest. To address these concerns, prominent members of Congress, including Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Josh Hawley, have advocated for banning individual stock trading by lawmakers and their families.

What To Know

Pelosi's ability to outperform the market has made her a focal point for many investors looking to emulate her success. Her and her husband's trading activity is closely monitored by retail investors and platforms like Autopilot and Unusual Whales, which allow users to replicate investment strategies.

Lawmakers' trades are governed by the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, which mandates disclosure but doesn't prevent trading activity altogether. In late 2024, her financial disclosures revealed several notable transactions involving the purchasing and selling of Nvidia shares.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: nancypelosi; nvidia

1 posted on 01/28/2025 5:08:52 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Nvidia, known as one of the best tech stocks, recently experienced a significant drop, losing over 15 percent of its value in a single day.

Buying opportunity - and I bought on the dip.
2 posted on 01/28/2025 5:11:02 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Now now, it is well known that her husband is the one that buys/sells stocks. Leave Nancy alone/sarc.


3 posted on 01/28/2025 5:13:58 PM PST by Sertorius (A hayseed with no Greek and dam^ proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Nancy Pelosi’s Husband Sold a Boatload of Nvidia Stock Right Before It Was Eviscerated by Chinese Startup

https://futurism.com/nancy-pelosis-husband-sold-nvidia-stocks-before-crash-chinese-ai

Nothing wrong with insider trading, right?


4 posted on 01/28/2025 5:18:15 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Man made Climate Change is Real. Cal. Officials responsible for the fires just proved it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

It was a HUGE buying opportunity at 240 too a few months back :)

And AMD was a HUGE buy opportunity about 30 dollars higher ago.

Buying the DIP...don’t look for praise until it’s at least a few months from the “dip” :)


5 posted on 01/28/2025 5:18:58 PM PST by dp0622 (Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Nothing wrong with insider trading, right?

Well, it is unethical, but it is not a crime, because the law is that Congress can do all the insider trading they want, and it's legal.

6 posted on 01/28/2025 5:21:48 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

She gets Sosha Security on top of all this?


7 posted on 01/28/2025 5:26:11 PM PST by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Nancy and her hubby have that amazing, stupendous luck of buying and selling just before government actions that affect their personal investment portfolios. Just lucky.


8 posted on 01/28/2025 5:29:51 PM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

This should clue you in on the US chip business, particularly Ai. Maybe Nancy watches this channel channel. He has a video specifically on Nvidial’s future about 6 months ago, too.

https://youtu.be/yEkAdyoZnj0?si=HcBhoyMcXQC5t1dW


9 posted on 01/28/2025 5:30:35 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I think this is nothing like the headline implies.

According to the article, she sold shares of NVDA but then turned around and bought calls (highly leveraged LEAPs expiring in a year). This was all before the recent decline.

If she was going to act based on her knowledge of an forthcoming drop in the stock, she would have waited until yesterday to buy the LEAPs.

I’m certainly no fan of Nancy Pelosi, but articles like this are dumb and counterproductive.


10 posted on 01/28/2025 5:52:06 PM PST by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’ve heard two of the best ways to trade stocks are to either track what Nancy does, or to do the opposite of what Jim Cramer recommends.


11 posted on 01/28/2025 5:52:10 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Hope you sold it today for 8% quick profit.


12 posted on 01/28/2025 6:04:18 PM PST by Bobbyvotes (I am in mid-80's and so do not try to change my opinions.te. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The 2012 STOCK act makes it illegal, but it’s just words and stuff.


13 posted on 01/28/2025 6:12:46 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

She probably relayed the message from president Xi who told her what they were going to do to take Nvidia down. She is very dirty.


14 posted on 01/28/2025 8:45:52 PM PST by ncfool (America has died we are living in the united socialist states of aMeriKa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Is Nancy‘s husband or George Soros invested in DeepSeek


15 posted on 01/28/2025 8:47:35 PM PST by ncfool (America has died we are living in the united socialist states of aMeriKa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Lawmakers’ trades are governed by the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, ..”

- Written by the very people it is supposed to govern…

And we can be SURE they didn’t leave a ‘back door’ or two in it -from which to work around the whole thing, right???

I mean.. these are AMERICAN politicians, right?


16 posted on 01/29/2025 5:04:48 AM PST by joethedrummer (We can't vote our way out of this, folks..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I sold my 200 shares the day before and bought them back the next day. That was pure luck.


17 posted on 01/29/2025 7:02:26 AM PST by Thomas Jerome (noob,retread,seagull,Chuck Schumer etc...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

They have sculpted a circuitous route to allow them to trade illegally. Pelosi is a vicious self-righteous BITCH who only talks the talk.


18 posted on 01/29/2025 7:37:03 AM PST by Machavelli (True God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alvin Diogenes
I’m certainly no fan of Nancy Pelosi, but articles like this are dumb and counterproductive.

So what reason would they have to personally decide to sell those stocks shortly before they lost 15%? One-off, sure, whatever. But her and her husband have these lucky breaks all the time somehow..
19 posted on 01/29/2025 10:41:42 AM PST by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

The point is that they bought back in before the decline.

I don’t know why they did that, but it’s misleading for the article to imply that they must have had inside information on the forthcoming decline. If they thought there was a decline coming, they wouldn’t have bought LEAPs a few weeks before the drop.

A better speculation would be that they sold the stock and, after that, got inside information on the upcoming Stargate project, and so decided to get back in again.

I have no idea if that’s true either, but at least it makes sense. Expecting a decline and buying calls makes no sense at all.


20 posted on 01/29/2025 12:01:28 PM PST by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson