Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Broke Rules by Criticizing Justice Alito During Flag Flap
WSJ ^ | 12/18/24 | Jess Bravin

Posted on 12/19/2024 5:10:24 PM PST by CFW

WASHINGTON—Amid collapsing public confidence in U.S. courts, a federal judge has been found culpable of misconduct. The offense? Questioning the ethics of a Supreme Court justice.

U.S. District Judge Michael Ponsor published an essay in the New York Times arguing that the display of flags associated with President-elect Donald Trump’s MAGA movement at Justice Samuel Alito’s Virginia and New Jersey homes was a breach of public trust. The piece was unusual because judges don’t typically offer personal criticisms of a colleague in public.

According to the jurist assigned to review the matter, Chief Judge Albert Diaz of the federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., it was Ponsor who damaged the judiciary. In a previously unreported order filed last week, Diaz found that by commenting on controversial issues and criticizing Alito, Ponsor violated the code of conduct that applies to all federal judges other than Supreme Court justices.

Among other transgressions, Ponsor, a 1994 Clinton appointee who sits in Springfield, Mass., was found to violate rules against actions that “detract from the dignity” of a judge’s office and harm “public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.” The judiciary has reason to be concerned about its perception. A Gallup survey published Tuesday found that public confidence in America’s courts had fallen by 24 percentage points since 2020, to a historic low of 35%.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: ethics; flag; judgeponsor; justicealito; scotus
I'd forgotten about this incident. Ponsor should have keep his mouth closed. Here is a paywall free link to the WSJ article:

Judge Broke Rules by Criticizing Justice Alito During Flag Flap

1 posted on 12/19/2024 5:10:24 PM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

Winning!!!


2 posted on 12/19/2024 5:17:30 PM PST by kenmcg (ti hi o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Does anyone on SCOTUS really have any colleagues who are not on SCOTUS.

I bet you they see themselves as demi-Gods.


3 posted on 12/19/2024 5:18:56 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Sow what happens? Not a damn thing. The Marxist scumbag still gets to warn that bench until he dies.


4 posted on 12/19/2024 5:19:18 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“a federal judge has been found culpable of misconduct”

That’s quite a rare sequence of words.


5 posted on 12/19/2024 5:26:43 PM PST by cdcdawg ("She runs a mean pick six," said Tim Walz, a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Federal and state canons of judicial ethics require judges to refrain from public criticism of other judges. Otherwise, judges tend to talk and act like squabbling politicians — its just that they have to keep it private among themselves.


6 posted on 12/19/2024 5:28:45 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

STRONG letter to follow.


7 posted on 12/19/2024 5:35:45 PM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
The judiciary has reason to be concerned about its perception.

Is that so?


8 posted on 12/19/2024 5:43:28 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“The piece was unusual because judges don’t typically offer”

Nothing is unusual when a ‘tard is behind the pen.

We should have never let these fking fools have a go at anything beyond holding a chair down at the nut house.

Our bad.


9 posted on 12/19/2024 5:47:29 PM PST by Sarcazmo (I live by the Golden Rule. As applied by others; I'm not selfish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Charlie Kirk was talking about this today, what a crap stain on America. He also called this DEI hire “low IQ” and made me howl so loud I scared the cat, did not expect this from him...I’m still laughing as I thought that was reserved for Khumulah.

Also another guest on the show today (didn’t catch his name) suggested Vance might go for eight years after Trump making a twelve-year run. Perhaps by then it will be a 8-1 advantage on the SCOTUS.


10 posted on 12/19/2024 6:00:09 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Where is Traitor Roberts to come out and say there is nothing to see here and that ALL Federal Judges are as pure as the driven snow?


11 posted on 12/19/2024 9:51:26 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

With a new sheriff in town, Roberts’ self-protective instinct will kick in and he will try to avoid drawing any attention to himself.


12 posted on 12/19/2024 10:40:17 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Roberts seemed to have “turtled” himself over the last few years...


13 posted on 12/19/2024 10:46:59 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

With exceptions, most high level appellate judges think that they understand and are clever at politics because they climbed the greasy pole to attain their position. In practice, such judges tend to get things wrong when they get involved in political matters. Roberts got a hard lesson in how that works that and seems to have drawn back as a result.


14 posted on 12/19/2024 10:52:55 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

What in the wide wide world of sports is that picture showing? Should I infer from the context that one of the unfortunate ladies onstage is a Supreme Court Justice? And what performance is that part of?


15 posted on 12/19/2024 11:00:24 PM PST by dayglored (This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Psalms 118:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
In the middle. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson took the Broadway stage in "& Juliet."

A big hit with LGBTQ, LMNOP crew apparently.

16 posted on 12/20/2024 12:46:35 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

What a DUMBASS DEI SHE IS!


17 posted on 12/20/2024 3:50:43 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson