Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s win may extend conservative control of the Supreme Court for decades
Los Angeles Times ^ | Nov. 7, 2024 | David G. Savage

Posted on 11/08/2024 4:37:34 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

President-elect Donald Trump’s election victory, combined with the Republican takeover of the Senate, may extend conservative control of the Supreme Court for two more decades.

For much of the last four years, progressives focused on proposals to expand the court to more than nine justices or to impose limited terms on the current justices. These ideas depended on Democrats winning sweeping power in the White House and the Senate.

Instead, Republicans will be in charge and positioned to preserve the conservative grip on the high court long after Trump leaves Washington.

The two oldest justices are also the bench’s most conservative. Clarence Thomas, 76, joined 33 years ago and is on track to become the longest-serving justice in the court’s history early in 2028. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., confirmed in 2006, is 74.

If Democrat Kamala Harris had won this presidential election, there was little chance the elder conservatives would have chosen to retire and have their seats filled by liberals.

But conservative analysts think it’s likely Alito or Thomas or both will retire in Trump’s second term.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: realitysettingin; scotus; soniasotomayor; tds; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 11/08/2024 4:37:34 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Winning!


2 posted on 11/08/2024 4:39:28 PM PST by broken_clock (Go Trump! Prayers answered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Hope Trump lets Thomas handpick his replacement


3 posted on 11/08/2024 4:41:06 PM PST by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Trump’s win may extend conservative American control of the Supreme Court for decades
4 posted on 11/08/2024 4:41:11 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
may extend conservative control of the Supreme Court for two more decades.

Hahahaha!

5 posted on 11/08/2024 4:42:10 PM PST by norcal joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

One thing you will know for sure.
Thomas will pick a great one.


6 posted on 11/08/2024 4:43:13 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I sure hope so.


7 posted on 11/08/2024 4:45:00 PM PST by Salman (Winning an election is not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I already voted for him!!

For the 3rd time! :D


8 posted on 11/08/2024 4:46:40 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Trump’s win may extend conservative Constitutional control of the Supreme Court for decades
9 posted on 11/08/2024 4:46:43 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Pity it isn’t a hundred.


10 posted on 11/08/2024 4:49:19 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Good. Liberals held the court for decades. Funny they never complained...


11 posted on 11/08/2024 4:50:22 PM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I think he should come out and say Joe and Kammy’s idea to expand the supreme court is a good one and he’ll do it...

Just to see all the liberal heads explode again.


12 posted on 11/08/2024 4:51:43 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

“ For much of the last four years, progressives focused on proposals to expand the court to more than nine justices…”

Well, hmmm.

Maybe now is the time?


13 posted on 11/08/2024 4:51:51 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Bwahahaha! I dont know what makes me happier, their rage at Trump’s win or twisting themselves into pretzels trying to justify it without placing ANY blame on what they have done.


14 posted on 11/08/2024 4:52:52 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Lots of sources today are saying Dems want Sotomayor to retire now.

Are they that brain dead? Do they not remember when Obama selected Garland for the Court, yet no votes were made until after Trump took office.

And of course Garland didn’t screw over America as a SC Justice. He did screw us over however as Attorney General.

Same thing here. If a position came up on the SCOTUS, Trump again will nominate a replacement.


15 posted on 11/08/2024 4:53:15 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (45/FJB/47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Why? Is Trump gonna take a page from the democrats and pack the court?


16 posted on 11/08/2024 4:55:13 PM PST by McCarthysGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

Biden showed his true colors when he desperately tried to keep Clarence Thomas off the Supreme Court.
I watched those hearings, and came away feeling a deep disgust for Biden that has NOT diminished over time.


17 posted on 11/08/2024 4:57:47 PM PST by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement! Thereon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

They don’t have the votes. Sinema and Manchin will say no. So they only have 49.


18 posted on 11/08/2024 5:00:16 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

We don’t need “conservative” Justices
We want Justices that will rule based on the Constitutionality of issues. And not on the twisted “Living Constitution”. I remember in school in the ‘60’s I had a social studies teacher teaching the Constitution’s meanings should evolve with the times
Also taught us how they gerrymandered Lubbock and Amarillo (he was a big democrat) to get a democrat representative. Heads full of mush being indoctrinated.
Thank you, Rush. Wish you were still here to share our victory.


19 posted on 11/08/2024 5:01:04 PM PST by TStro (Come and take it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

And maybe something happens to the wise latina and she has to be replaced.


20 posted on 11/08/2024 5:04:11 PM PST by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson