Posted on 10/01/2024 9:08:02 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
On Tuesday, as reports were coming in of Iran's ballistic missiles hitting Israel, António Guterres, the Secretary-General of the anti-Israel United Nations, posted his demands for a ceasefire.
"I condemn the broadening of the Middle East conflict with escalation after escalation," Guterres posted. "We absolutely need a ceasefire," he also insisted, as if we haven't already heard such a call from the UN so many times before.
I condemn the broadening of the Middle East conflict with escalation after escalation.
This must stop.
We absolutely need a ceasefire.— António Guterres (@antonioguterres) October 1, 2024
UN Secretary General calls for a CEASEFIRE during the Iranian missile attack against Israel.
“I condemn the broadening of the Middle East conflict with escalation after escalation.
This must stop.
We absolutely need a ceasefire.”pic.twitter.com/5b3g7MQ8Tv— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) October 1, 2024
Guterres' post has received approximately 8,000 replies taking issue with his demands. Israel's X account also contributed to the over 1,000 quoted reposts, telling Guterres in no uncertain terms that they will not give into his demands.
"We condemn your inability to string together a tweet which holds Iran responsible for firing 181 ballistic missiles at 10 million Israeli civilians," the post fittingly read.
We condemn your inability to string together a tweet which holds Iran responsible for firing 181 ballistic missiles at 10 million Israeli civilians.@antonioguterres https://t.co/5MLYbYqLlz— Israel ישראל (@Israel) October 1, 2024
“Iran’s attack is a severe and dangerous escalation. There will be consequences…We will respond wherever, whenever and however we choose, in accordance with the directive of the government of Israel.”
Watch IDF Spokesperson RAdm. Daniel Hagari regarding Iran’s large-scale attack. pic.twitter.com/A8pyC7eawI— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) October 1, 2024
Matt's also covered how Israel will conduct airstrikes across the region in response to the attack.
Demanding a ceasefire wasn't the only problematic part of Guterres' post. Naftali Bennett, the former prime minister of Israel also took issue with Guterres referring to "the broadening" of conflict, rather than condemning the Islamic Republic of Iran for their aggression against the Jewish State.
You’ve gotta be kidding.
You condemn”the broadening”?!
You just aren’t able to blurt the simple words “I condemn the Islamic Republic of Iran who just shot roughly 180 deadly ballistic missiles towards the citizens of Israel.”
Quit. https://t.co/8RCl0F3GZl— Naftali Bennett נפתלי בנט (@naftalibennett) October 1, 2024
Guterres expressed grave concern about Lebanon earlier on Tuesday, in which he also "appeal[ed] for an immediate ceasefire." His post even spoke about how "the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lebanon must be respected."
Such a post also received some less than friendly responses, with many also reminding about what a failure the UN has been on this issue.
I am extremely concerned with the escalation of the conflict in Lebanon and appeal for an immediate ceasefire.
An all-out war must be avoided in Lebanon at all costs, and the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lebanon must be respected.— António Guterres (@antonioguterres) October 1, 2024
Oh, you’re concerned for Lebanon?
Where were you when Hezbollah has took Lebanon hostage and made the entire South of Lebanon a military base?
Israel is FREEING Lebanon from its cancer, Hezbollah. Cut the BS.— Vivid.🇮🇱 (@VividProwess) October 1, 2024
You were also extremely silent for almost 12 months, as Hezbollah pounded Israel with rockets and UNIFIL looked the other way as UNSC Resl 1701 was trashed. Now you can’t even mention Hezbollah. You are a coward and an embarrassment of a leader!— Arsen Ostrovsky 🎗️ (@Ostrov_A) October 1, 2024
"The sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lebanon" hasn't been respected since Hezbollah terrorists began operating a State within a State in Lebanon.
Resolution 1701 called for disarming Hezbollah and keeping them out of South Lebanon.
The last year has proven UN's failure— Joel M. Petlin (@Joelmpetlin) October 1, 2024
The timing was particularly poor on such a post, as the IDF was posting about sirens going off not long after Guterres was posting about Lebanon. Further, there were reports earlier in the day about the White House being aware of Iran preparing to "imminently" attacking Israel with ballistic missiles.
For all of his demands, especially to do with Lebanon, Guterres might want to take it up with Hezbollah. In addition to invading Lebanon on Monday, Israel has been taking out Hezbollah terrorists for weeks, including just after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke at the UN last Friday, in a move that was purposefully meant to give the terrorists a false sense of security.
The UN's X account has reposted Guterres and doubled down on concerns for Lebanon and with calling for a ceasefire, posting and reposting about Lebanon no less than four times on Tuesday.
A pinned post from the UN, posted earlier on Tuesday, points out that "civilians always pay the highest price." In Israel on Tuesday, approximately 10 million civilians were the target of Iran's missiles.
In conflict, civilians always pay the highest price.
War is not the answer.
We need peace.pic.twitter.com/w86Jh7sXCh— United Nations (@UN) October 1, 2024
Maybe that step is on a secret list :)
Courage. The US still has a lot of it...just not in its leaders...or at least not enough of them.
Bibi calling the UN a joke made me feel high as a kite :)
It should be bottled.
The UN has morphed into the UM aka United Muslims
Israel’s reply to the UN should be
“Y’All can Get Pumped”
Mike-drop....
LOL THAT’S for sure !!!🤪
Screw the UN, bomb the Muzzies deeper into the Stone Age, etc is all well and good, but this will draw the USA into war in the Middle East. Again. It’s only a matter of time.
*
End-time or a fore-shadowing? I too thought end-time = soon.
Read the Left Behind series and only examined it from a very soon
perspective. Even know difference between rapture vs harpazos
(snatching away).
1st we need to re-assess end-times, ask how close are we?
If you check there are approx 10-15k tribes, tongues, nations
still needing to be reached with the Gospel and that
too is much harder than it may 1st appear.
I never even learned a 2nd language let alone a new language
that few or none can speak nor translate. Some are so primitive
they have only a spoken language or none to understand anything
written.
Are the Jewish people able to re-create OT worship with
animal sacrifices? What prevents them from
rebuilding the Temple needed for OT worship?
How close are we to a 1-world religion, language or monetary system?
2nd Peter 3:8 is another indication of longer time frames since
the Hebrew calendar show 5,785 years since creation rather than
over 6k years (4k OT and 2025 NT).
In other words we do not know precisely, but I trust those
who preserved the Oracles from God (the Bible OT + NT)
rather than the popular views of today.
It could still be within our lifetimes but those rapture-ready will
only see most of Matt 24 fulfilled - but not
the abomination of desolation.
The whole Earth is reached in Revelation 14
However, you are definitely free to ignore all of this and just skip the threads.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.