Posted on 09/13/2024 3:09:10 AM PDT by jerod
When you win a fight, you don't need a rematch... Harris lost the debate and Trump should stick to his guns... No more debates with biased commentators who failed, despite their best efforts, to destroy Trump in the first debate.
The left wing media's bias was on full display during that debate, and it appears that American's are getting better at recognizing that bias and they are rejecting it.
To cheat more?
They really tried to sew up the narrative for the landslide they are about to reverse.
But these dummies are torpedoing themselves daily, they must think their “Kamel won the debate” narrative isn’t going to hold!
Trump is holding out for a better deal. If none is offered he will just walk away.
This is where Trump and the Republicans fail to call the bluff of Democrats.
Think about it, Trump should have been the first person to call for two debates, flip a coin on who goes first
One debate should allow the Democrat to choose the time, place, format and moderators
The second debate should be the Republicans get to the time, place, format and moderators
The about the current situation, Trump had the deck stacked against him and next week Kamala Harris had to debate with Mark Levin or some other hard nosed Conservative grilling and fact checking her, she would melt down
Of course the Democrats would never agree to such a deal so it would likely end the debates which are basically worthless to begin with
Totally agree with post #7. 4D chess....
That wasn’t a debate. That was a 3 on 1 leftist lie fest.
And when are women going to stand up to this "killing of babies" as just plain wrong. They have become sheep.
She was declared the winner but no one has called her out earnestly on all the lies . She “won” on style, not substance .
Trump tells The Post why he won’t debate Harris again: ‘Just don’t think that there’s any need for it’
“She was a no-show at the Fox Debate, and refused to do NBC & CBS,” Trump wrote of Harris on Truth Social. “KAMALA SHOULD FOCUS ON WHAT SHE SHOULD HAVE DONE DURING THE LAST ALMOST FOUR YEAR PERIOD. THERE WILL BE NO THIRD DEBATE!”
Trump should agree, after she accepts Mark Levin and Tucker Carlson as moderators.
No more debates with biased commentators who failed, despite their best efforts, to destroy Trump in the first debate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well, we could have a debate equally stacked with Trump moderators.
Imagine Shawn Hannity and Joe Rogan as moderators.
Trump deserves his stacking against the enemy chance?
BUahahahahahahahaha!
Harris revealed she is an empty suited dog who ;lives by aggression and a dislocated sense of unAMerican values, untrustworthy liar.
THe American people see right through her.(Thats what TRump accomplished.) He showed the world that she is an empty suit, emminantly controllable by her puppet masters, Obama and Soros.It was not about who won, it was about revealing Harris for who she really is.That was accomplished.
They didn’t get the results they wanted. Other than the extreme sites and the media cheerleaders, no one is claiming Kamala won.
The debate (ABC, Dems) was aimed at the undecided in the swing states.
At least half support abortion rights.
Sadly, at least half of men also support a woman's right to abort their child support payments.
The voters are sick and tired of debates.
She lived in Montreal for SEVEN YEARS, graduating from high school and spent two years at a Montreal college.
THAT alone should disqualify her - all these NON AMERICANS have ZERO loyalty to America.
You think her numbers are showing her on a glide path after the debate?
She will only “debate” on alphabet networks where she is given all the questions a week in advance and all the moderators are on her side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.