Posted on 07/25/2024 12:12:38 PM PDT by george76
Whistleblower tells me local law enforcement partners & suppliers offered drones to Secret Service BEFORE the rally - but Secret Service declined
...
Inside job.
...
the drones USSS was offered have the capability not only to identify active shooters but also to help neutralize them
Didn’t SS put their screw ups on local police?
They didn’t want the drones to distract the assassin
Well, FIB is investigating and I can say with 100% certainty that the perps that were part of this inside job to assassinate a former president will be prosecuted. * bwahaha ..sarc...sarc.. bwahaha...
Of course not.
The actions of the patsy had to remain clouded for plausible deniability’s sake.
Local LEOs are not going to be thrown under the bus.
Why is it I have a feeling Wray and Cheatle (for starters) were part of this inside job?
This was an ordered hit..PERIOD..Biden dropping out had absolutely NOTHING to do with the debate..the media was still defending him after that and after the NATO press conference most in the media said he did what he had to do..why did Biden drop out, because the assassination failed, Trump was supposed to be dead..Nikki Haley would have been given the nomination at the convention, and Biden’s goons figured heck if she wins its fine she is basically Biden in a dress anyway
Which assassin?
Is an assassination as bad as praying inside the Capitol?
I’m interested in said drones that had the capability to help neutralize a shooter...
Well, to play devil’s advocate on this one, if I was in charge of security and you waited until the day before to offer up some drones, I would be upset that we didn’t have enough time to inspect them, at the very least for security vulnerabilities, and that doesn’t even include the potential that someone wants to get a trojan asset in the secure airspace. 1 day before is too late
That’s exactly what the evidence points to, that this was a professional assassination and the amateur shooter was a patsy used to provide cover for that operation.
Local LEOs need to arrest those responsible for the injuries and murder of Pennsylvania citizens. Leverage the Pennsylvania criminal code to arrest the guilty and extradite them back to Pennsylvania to stand trial in front of local juries.
BEFORE the Trump rally, local Butler, Pa law enforcement partners and
suppliers offered the S/S the use of drones w/ significant capabilities:
<><>not only to identify active shooters
<><>but also to help neutralize the shooter
<><>the Secret Service declined.
Roughly half of the Secret Service’s $3 billion budget is spent on “protective services.”
The SS also has:
<><> a robust cybercrime division,
<><>state-of-the-art forensic labs
<><>a threat-assessment center
<><>there agents study “how to mitigate and train against threats.”
No training as yet on how to navigate a “sloped roof.”
These inconsistencies about staffing, positions, responsibilities of Secret Service vs. local cops, etc.. can be muddled forever by TPTB.
The one thing which will never be totally clear is how to recruit a patsy, goad him into action, keep him quiet during the process, hide evidence of their involvement.
We've all heard of OSS/CIA projects like Artichoke and MKUltra, but such methods being used in 2024 (assuming they are) will likely never be revealed.
That argument can be made, and you did. But it doesn't address why those in charge refused to use their own drones. And why the roof was left unprotected. And why Trump wasn't kept off the stage when it was known there was a potential problem. And why there is no recording of the radio traffic (if that is true.)
All said, the people in charge failed. It turns out the local people probably should have been in charge because they had more competence that the “highly trained professionals.”
The FBI also had that capability with COINTELPRO—and it is highly likely it was used in the MLK assassination.
There are some excellent books on that topic—for those who want to drill deeply this book covers several assassinations including MLK and Malcolm X:
https://www.amazon.com/Assassinations-Probe-Magazine-JFK-Malcolm/dp/193623937X
But it doesn’t address why those in charge refused to use their own drones.
~~~
True. In this day and age where kids down the street are playing with toy drones, and nations are going to war with them, and law enforcement use them surveillance and fugitive apprehension, you’d think the secret service would all aboard with drones.
Unless, of course, they are using them, and they either want to keep them a secret for strategic purposes, or they intentionally didn’t chose to use them for nefarious purposes.
Does anyone have any evidence that the secret service has used drones in the recent past, such as for President Biden?
The SS requested funding for drones in 2022:
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/privacy-pia-usss028-uas-may2020_0.pdf
Check out this SS document:
https://www.secretservice.gov/protection/specialoperations/path
It looks like they must have received that funding.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.