Posted on 07/14/2024 12:43:09 PM PDT by McGruff
I think I heard the people that saw him were outside the event near that building
Coward
The officer didn’t draw before going onto the roof?
Didn’t check the roof from the eye line?
Didn’t have their revolver out once on top of the roof if they didn’t see anything?
Ultimately this is more fallout from the summer of love 2020 and destroying our police forces nationwide.
Sounds like the shooter was rushed into taking the shots at Trump thinking he didn’t have much time after he was discovered. The officer may have unknowingly saved Trump’s life.
Always always always get on the radio first if you can’t immediately influence the situation.
If someone tells you there’s a shooter on the roof...you report it at the same time you’re climbing...and you’re NOT empty handed.
Retreated? He didn’t have a f-ing radio on him?
AP trying to blame local police to protect the Secret Service.
Blame locals?
The counter snipers had the shooter in their sights and they let him get off eight.
“This is not a battle against flesh and blood.”
At some point, stupid becomes it’s own solid element.
Little things are important in the battle. What if the officer had not distracted the shooter?
He made the shooter rush his shot.
Leading to the non-fatal hit.
One thought has been bothering me has to do with the SS snipers who killed the perp. Why did they not see the perp on the roof beforehand. The guy probably accessed the roof with a ladder, then crawled to his firing position, then had to get into a proper position to make a kill shot all of which takes time. If the SS snipers saw him after the five shots, why not before??
Yet he still was able to get off several shots and shoot 3 people.
My guess is that the shooter showed his FBI (agency attacking Trump for the past 8 years) legitimate I.D. badge and the officer backed down the ladder [ /sarcasm ]
Could be the reason why the shooter rushed to fire off since he was found out and missed getting a direct hit
Hearsay, not facts. Funny how none of the video evidence, nor the eyewitness testimony shows this supposed confrontation the “anonymous source” claims happened. Also, shooter fired MULTIPLE shots, so the supposed statement here by this supposed “anonymous source” is directly contradicted by the physical evidence
There is a LOT of information in the article.
Bingo.
Hearsay, not facts. Funny how none of the video evidence, nor the eyewitness testimony shows this supposed confrontation the “anonymous source” claims happened. Also, shooter fired MULTIPLE shots, so the supposed statement here by this supposed “anonymous source” is directly contradicted by the physical evidence
Maybe he wasn’t really a cop. Maybe like an police auxiliary? Not sure about this report.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.