Posted on 07/03/2024 8:46:22 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
“The beauty is that unless Joe actually resigns, there will be no replacement Vice President appointed.”
Another interesting point is that if Biden still refused to drop out of the race, the delegates would still be obligated to nominate him at the convention. So you could have the situation where Kamala was the acting president, but Biden is still the nominee of the Dem party (although I’m sure he would have a different VP candidate at that point).
“People who think Kamala is unelectable are failing to grasp the full court press from media and big tech to gaslight everyone obo the First Woman and Second African American President and the sheer stupidity of millions of middle aged wine moms.”
You are absolutely correct. White female liberals are raging liberals. Kamala will win. Competency will not matter. Trump, who I support, will also likely add fuel to their rage with silly name calling. Sorry to have that, but it’s true.
>>>>>>The cases which heard challenges to Obama on the merits, rested on an interpretation of Wong Kim Ark of 1898.
Now you’re just making bleep up.
>>>>>>The question is: Can someone born an “alien” to the US, be a “natural born citizen” as required by the constitution to be VP or President?
Please answer that.
Yes. Why yes they can. Are you a US citizen over age 35? Then YOU are eligible.
Again, please explain, how can someone born an “alien” (relative to the US), be a “natural born citizen”?
I'll put this in large font and use 3 simple words so even you can understand:
I hope they replace him with a white male. Maybe blacks would wake up then and stop voting 90% Democrat.
Most cases were refused due to a lack of standing, per: Barack Obama Eligibility Legislation per Wikipedia
One case heard, turned on Wong Kim Ark, Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, per Wikipedia:
In December 2008, Steve Ankeny and Bill Kruse filed a "Petition for Extraordinary Writ of Prohibition" against Indiana governor Mitch Daniels to block "any popular votes for Barack Obama and Joe Biden for the appointment as Chief Electors [sic]." A hearing was held, and on March 16, 2009, Daniels' motion to dismiss was granted. The Plaintiffs appealed the ruling to the Indiana Court of Appeals, which upheld it on November 12, 2009.[100]
The appellate decision addressed the question of whether Obama's eligibility was affected by his father's lack of U.S. citizenship, saying that "[b]ased upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are 'natural born Citizens' for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."[101] On April 1, 2010, the Indiana Supreme Court rejected, without comment, a request to consider the case.[102]
Try doing some research next time, as right now you obviously don’t know what you posting about.
So. Based on what I’ve been reading Reuters is the Underground Railroad for comments of dissention in the White House escaping.
You’re the one trying to distract our side from winnable issues with debunked fiction. Your screen name alone tells us just how unserious you are. In fact, I half wonder if you’re not a plant from the left attempting to lead us down a rabbit hole of nonsense.
You went from ... The cases which heard challenges to Obama on the merits, rested on an interpretation of Wong Kim Ark of 1898.
to...... One case heard, turned on Wong Kim Ark, Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, per Wikipedia.
Anyway, I'm tired of trying to set you straight. I've learned to never argue with a fool, so I'll leave you to have the last word. And don't forget to - once again - insert your cute little link.
In response, you continue to make unfounded accusations.
Are you a troll, or just someone who is incapable of reading?
ROTFL! America’s first wiggling, giggling and jiggling fruit salad hat “president”. DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY OH Sh*t!!!!
John Eastman's 2020 article on the Ineligibility of Kamala Harris
The primary distinction is that Eastman did not have documentation to fully support his claims at the time regarding residency and jurisdiction (but we do now).
As actual Pres only idiots think it can be anyone but KHarris. She is Vice, she interviewed for and was elected to the job. Cannot be replaced.
Now, as candidate for next Pres, OK.
But,anyone but a black woman will doom the DNC.
Ooh, ooh, how about one of those affirmative action hires in SCOTUS?
Are the leakers of the same racial, political, and gender persuasion as the VP? I ask, because it is not unusual for people to back their like persons, irrespective of the quality of the person they are supporting. (Not that Biden is a quality person; both of them are duds).
"Welcome to Free Republic! Established in 1996, Free Republic is one of the earliest and largest online gathering places for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!
So, how about rooting out political fraud (instead of discouraging it)?
Source: https://freerepublic.com/home.htm
I would think if the top people in the Party decides he needs to go, Jill might not be able to stop it. I could be wrong, but the Party apparatus is needed for Biden’s basement campaign.
Kamala Harris's 'abusive' office: VP rocked by claims staffers are 'treated like sh**'
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.